If GB wants to win the Super Bowl they'd be smart to throw this game. You don't beat Belichick twice in the same year. You show him anything and he will completely take it away next go round.
Real talk.
Simplify the offense even if it means a loss this go round. I been studying Belichick for too long. You show your hand and he WILL take advantage in the rematch.
tell that to the 2007 Giants
The Giants lost in the regular season to the Pats. 
If anything that proves my point, although in this case not so much because that had to do with NYG's defense and what I'm talking about is Belichick's ability to shut down an offense. Just off base on so many levels.
If anything that proves my point, although in this case not so much because that had to do with NYG's defense and what I'm talking about is Belichick's ability to shut down an offense. Just off base on so many levels.
Giants beat them twice in 2011 though.
If anything that proves my point, although in this case not so much because that had to do with NYG's defense and what I'm talking about is Belichick's ability to shut down an offense. Just off base on so many levels.
Giants beat them twice in 2011 though.
The Giants won 2 Super Bowl's over the Patriots because of their defensive line.
Points are just numbers out of context. It's not like the Giants lit em up in either game so Beli's defense wasn't the problem.
Im just comparing the Giants offense numbers by your statements. Not the whole game in general or who won.
But none of that really matters. Both games were good performances by the Patriots' defense. They didn't lose either game because of the Giants' offense. None of what you're saying has anything to do with what I'm saying.
you said: "If GB wants to win the Super Bowl they'd be smart to throw this game. You don't beat Belichick twice in the same year. You show him anything and he will completely take it away next go round."
"Belichick is a defensive genius. He specializes in taking away your best weapon."
What im saying has exactly to do with what you're saying
He failed to do so in 2011. His defensive changes wasnt by much (only 3 point) in the second game. No one is talking about who won or what the score was except you breh.
Its like saying "oh the Packers scored 28 in the first game but we kept them to 25 in the SB"
The numbers are irrelevant. Your point is the differential between game 1 and 2. Im trying to tell u the differential isnt much. Not that hard to comprehend breh
Neither one of those games matter because Beli's defense played well enough to win in both games. They lost because their own offense got shut down. What is so hard to comprehend?
I put dumb nikkas on ignore everyday. Don't be the next contestant...
