I don't think putting "people" in quotes is necessary, that's pretty much the exact same rhetoric that neo-nazi who got punched in the face uses about jews. I don't think we should judge others "let ye without sin cast the first stone" etc. But if we are going to make judgement calls, I think the best way to do so is by comparing a person's actions against their words. So if you're criticizing white-supremacists for their racist values, which treat others as subhuman, by using their same ideological arguments, then your logic fails the rhetorical litmus test.
On a philosophical level, talking about "being at their core a righteous person" implies there's such a thing as a transcendental signifier like "righteous" or "good" or "virtuous". Words get their meaning from how they differ from other words, there's no metaphysical, one-to-one correspondence, like some platonic ideal. So the answer to the question: do 'good' white people exist? Is "No," because there's no such thing as "good" for any person to be, the same way there's no "evil" either.
This isn't just playing semantics (though it certainly is that), it's important to recognize how people get their individual meanings because it shows that one person's perception of "good" can be the complete opposite of someone else's, which causes people to view individuals with different values in an "us" vs "them" mentality. Once we get over this fact, maybe we can come to some pragmatic approaches toward global collaboration in order to achieve some world where we finally control our individual chaotic tendencies toward war and violence against the "Other" more so than we have in the past, ex: putting "people" in quotes when referring to those who are different in order to dehumanize them.
so what about the oppression by individuals that look just like you¿
*
So in the end, after 3 paragraphs of equivocation, there is no definition of good therefore we can't say. Thank you for wasting my time.



You do realize that philosophers have been wrestling with these questions for centuries?
It's certainly not a waste of time to discuss where people get their morals and ethics from, because people's morals and ethics are what prevent them from doing or not doing certain actions — such as murder/violence/war.
Edit: I wasn't being ambiguous, I specifically answered your question, "No."
That said, if you define "good people" as someone who will do all the work for you, then you need to redefine your standards, get off your ass and get real
Sometimes we'll have lunch or I'll go by their office and talk about different stuff or what I'm up to, haven't done it in a while a though.Get your cac ass outta here and don't @ me again. I don't have a "troll" thread on my record.. meanwhile your threads:
http://www.thecoli.com/threads/have-any-of-you-ever-heard-of-the-concept-mudsharking.491208/
How so? Friends, or friendly with? You over their house? Eating dinner? Confiding? Hitting the gym? Or do yall just smile and exchange niceties?
Not a troll thread. We must understand people are capable of good deeds, but at the very core are they righteous? Because I've studied race and these "people" for years, I find racial discourse in Amerika comical. Would you say the following "people" are good?
Also, do you have white friends? Have you ever experienced racism?
- Tim Wise
- Jane Elliot
- Shaun King
- John Brown
Not even trying to be condescending but you seem a little green.Sometimes we'll have lunch or I'll go by their office and talk about different stuff or what I'm up to, haven't done it in a while a though.

Yes to the bolded.Not even trying to be condescending but you seem a little green.
Have you heard of:
Dr Amos Wilson
Dr Ishakamusa Barashango
Dr Ben
Dr Afrika
Dr Welsing
Khalid Muhammad
Louis Farrakhan
Elijah Muhamma
If not, please familiarize yourself.