do people still deny Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection

NoMayo15

All Star
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
4,468
Reputation
295
Daps
6,313
lol at adaptation being applied cross species. the thing is, different species cannot become each other. like a dolphin will not become a horse. monkeys cannot become people. lol at having to explain this.

what Darwin is supposing already has a name, its called mutation. mutation does not occur making a species better, it mutates based on its environment. if you take a species and move its environment, it will ADAPT to its environment. It will not change into a different creature, evolving and so forth. a fish will grow extra fins, or an additional gill, but it wont turn into a fox. the reason white people like to believe this obviously false theory is because they can quietly assume superiority, as did Darwin. sucks to be so self absorbed tho, it is blinding.

evolution is FALSE. lol

Lmao, you clearly don't understand evolution. Why would a dolphin become a horse, or monkey become a human? Humans and horses aren't "more evolved" than monkeys and dolphins. Evolution doesn't work as if there is a goal, which each animal is trying to reach human-like intelligence. The fact that you think evolution states species will become other species -- that, if true, monkeys should one day become human -- is laughable. It won't become human, it will be some other species.
 

MostReal

Bandage Hand Steph
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
25,983
Reputation
3,541
Daps
58,987
Wait. You were just telling me your problem with the theory of evolution was the term of evolution itself. Your logic behind that is because racists took that term and turned it into thinking they were more highly evolved? Would them thinking they were more highly "adapted" change things at all?

Again you are missing the point. Evolution is a term that SUPPOSE to mean it uses natural selection as a survival method. That the more evolved organism will thrive and live. This is false because it is based off of a White Supremacy mindset. The people who subscribe to this forget that blacks & others have 'survived' and thrived on this Earth long before whites were here. By this logic, the 'evolved' whites were not needed for humanity to survive.

So yes, changing the word to adapted would not mean the same thing...because whites would still have other genetic problems that the environment could force them to compensate for while others would not have to compensate & just thrive naturally through selection. This is why adaptation is the best word. Environment dictates these things. If you take a more 'evolved organism' out of its environment & placed it in one that negates all of its advantages is it truly more evolved? Adaptation would have to occur again for it to survive.

What Darwin (maybe indirectly) & White Supremacist are really saying is that Evolution is needed for them to survive. This is not the case for the rest of Humanity proven by our history & longevity on this earth.
 

NoMayo15

All Star
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
4,468
Reputation
295
Daps
6,313
Again you are missing the point. Evolution is a term that SUPPOSE to mean it uses natural selection as a survival method. That the more evolved organism will thrive and live.

No, you should give up your preconceived notion of what you think evolution should mean. It means one thing in this specific context, and evolution doesn't work like there are "more evolved" organisms today. Some are better suited for survival than others, and those that are will be selected for naturally. Mutations in DNA over generations is what leads to speciation.
 

MostReal

Bandage Hand Steph
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
25,983
Reputation
3,541
Daps
58,987
It means one thing in this specific context, and evolution doesn't work like there are "more evolved" organisms today.
This is a lie and you know it, be honest & have frank discussion. This is the basis of the denial of everything African/black in Egypt. This is what's behind the present use of the terms civilized and savage depicting races today. This word props up the delusion that some of us are not the same ability wise mentally. This word is behind all of the imaging used to depict Blacks as untrained or unlearned. This word props up tools like this which support Evolved Wisdom can only be attained through the bright eyed etc.


I'm not the one with preconceived notions. I'm telling you what this word means to us in its present form & you all refuse to accept that the wool has been pulled over your eyes.
 

Sensitive Blake Griffin

Banned
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
37,123
Reputation
2,646
Daps
67,715
Again you are missing the point. Evolution is a term that SUPPOSE to mean it uses natural selection as a survival method. That the more evolved organism will thrive and live. This is false because it is based off of a White Supremacy mindset. The people who subscribe to this forget that blacks & others have 'survived' and thrived on this Earth long before whites were here. By this logic, the 'evolved' whites were not needed for humanity to survive.

So yes, changing the word to adapted would not mean the same thing...because whites would still have other genetic problems that the environment could force them to compensate for while others would not have to compensate & just thrive naturally through selection. This is why adaptation is the best word. Environment dictates these things. If you take a more 'evolved organism' out of its environment & placed it in one that negates all of its advantages is it truly more evolved? Adaptation would have to occur again for it to survive.

What Darwin (maybe indirectly) & White Supremacist are really saying is that Evolution is needed for them to survive. This is not the case for the rest of Humanity proven by our history & longevity on this earth.
what the fukk are you talking about
 

MostReal

Bandage Hand Steph
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
25,983
Reputation
3,541
Daps
58,987
@NoMayo15 can you translate what he said into cac for me?

here breh

Polar bears have evolved for a life on the sea ice, which they rely on for reaching their seal prey. But the arctic sea ice is rapidly diminishing due to a warming Earth, affecting the entire arctic ecosystem, from copepods to seals to walruses. For polar bears, sea ice losses mean:
  • Reduced access to food
  • Drop in body condition
  • Lower cub survival rates
  • Increase in drowning
  • Increase in cannibalism
  • Loss of access to denning areas
  • *Declining population size


so did the Polar Bear really evolve from the Brown/Grizzly Bear or did it just adapt to its new environment?

Again Evolution means: the gradual development of something, especially from a simple to a more complex form
synonyms of evolution are: advancement, growth, progress etc.
 
Last edited:

NoMayo15

All Star
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
4,468
Reputation
295
Daps
6,313
This is a lie and you know it, be honest & have frank discussion. This is the basis of the denial of everything African/black in Egypt. This is what's behind the present use of the terms civilized and savage depicting races today. This word props up the delusion that some of us are not the same ability wise mentally. This word is behind all of the imaging used to depict Blacks as untrained or unlearned. This word props up tools like this which support Evolved Wisdom can only be attained through the bright eyed etc.

I'm not the one with preconceived notions. I'm telling you what this word means to us in its present form & you all refuse to accept that the wool has been pulled over your eyes.

Well clearly YOU aren't the same as the rest of us ability wise mentally. Like others have pointed out, Darwin was a product of his time, and to get butt-hurt over that to discredit evolution is ridiculous. You personally have added your own baggage to the word, when there's nothing inherently wrong with it.
 

NoMayo15

All Star
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
4,468
Reputation
295
Daps
6,313
so did the Polar Bear really evolve from the Brown/Grizzly Bear or did it just adapt to its new environment?

I don't know, but probably not. They probably BOTH evolved from some other, similar bear.

*edit* Something like this:

stamboomberen.jpg



And yes, a racc00n will never turn into a polar bear... that's because one isn't "more evolved" than the other. Becoming bigger, stronger isn't the goal in which organisms try to reach. It's only "what can survive best, given the conditions". So the racc00n will eventually change ... but into some OTHER species, not necessarily a bear.
 

Dragonfly Jones

Siiiiiiiilence Punk!!
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
4,448
Reputation
157
Daps
11,034
Reppin
KungFu Fighting & kicks that are fast as Lightning
I think it all comes down to ego and pride.

People simply can't accept evolution because it then puts them on the same level as an ape and most people simply aren't comfortable with that.

It's something they can not and will not accept under any circumstances no matter how big the mountain of evidence you put in front of them is.

Instead of just admitting this they attempt to look for holes in science rather than accept the reality of the situation
 

NoMayo15

All Star
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
4,468
Reputation
295
Daps
6,313
I think it all comes down to ego and pride.

People simply can't accept evolution because it then puts them on the same level as an ape and most people simply aren't comfortable with that.

It's something they can not and will not accept under any circumstances no matter how big the mountain of evidence you put in front of them is.

Instead of just admitting this they attempt to look for holes in science rather than accept the reality of the situation

That and they can't think of any way it could have happened unless an all intelligent being made it happen. Arguments from ignorance/incredulity and appeals to probability.
 
Top