Be naive brehs. Hold this neg. Welcome to the coli.
Damn. Ruthless.

Be naive brehs. Hold this neg. Welcome to the coli.

If thats the case, then again, you didnt do your due dilligence enough. The person you're marrying, really shouldnt be that different to the person you're divorcing. If they are, it means they played you and you didnt do your homework. Didnt focus on the important things about a persons character. Didnt look at their track record etc.
Lol. Naive, Idealistic you can give me whatever label you want. I know I believe in the right thing, I believe in marriage done the right way. Meaning it be a connection of trust love and respect first and foremost between 2 individuals.
I understand what you mean, breh. But it's still a safe way to go. I used to be completely against it unless one of the individuals was forced to be a stay at home parent. But you never know how someone is going to act when they're hurt or their lifestyle is going to change.
No you're insurance is there to protect your assets in the case something happens. You don't expect nor plan for that to happen.Lol, that comparison doesnt stick. But ok, for the sake of argument, if that is the logic, your 'insurance' to a marriage that lasts should be trust, love and mutual respect. Not some piece of paper. Your spouse is supposed to be the 1 person in your life you should be able to rely on.
I get that its hard to come across these days, because people get married too soon, for all the wrong reasons and to the wrong people. But I stand by my belief, marry the right person for the right reasons, do your due dilligence as much as you can. Doing this might not mitigate the risk of a divorce but it will significantly impact how a possible divorce is handled.
or can they be tossed out?
Is there now way to create a legally binding agreement that if a divorce happens the agreed contract will go into effecf?
Why get married if you think you're gonna need protection from your spouse?
When I got married I didn't sign a prenump BUT if you get out under 5 years then nothing can be asked for....especially if you didn't earn or go into debt with your marriage partner during that time.
I got out very lucky but can't say the same for cats who are married 7-10 years.
If thats the case, then again, you didnt do your due dilligence enough. The person you're marrying, really shouldnt be that different to the person you're divorcing. If they are, it means they played you and you didnt do your homework. Didnt focus on the important things about a persons character. Didnt look at their track record etc.
I assume this varies by state?




Lol. Naive, Idealistic you can give me whatever label you want. I know I believe in the right thing, I believe in marriage done the right way. Meaning it be a connection of trust love and respect first and foremost between 2 individuals.
Yeah because in Texas there is community property so everything is split down the middle but I never got divorced in Texas so I can't quote it.
I was lucky. We shared no joint bank account, had no kids, she has about 60k in student loan debt as I had none, she bought her own car and I made sure never to get into anything with her financially within the first year of us being married.
So when I left her my lawyer filed a summary dissolution since it was under 5 years we had been married. It was simple as that....
Would I get married again?
No.![]()
If i understand correctly, the only time debt is taken on by a partner is if both parties put their name on debt. And also any debt brought into a marriage is responsibility of the person who brought it in (ie. student loans).

She asked me the DAY after the honeymoon....no fukking joke....the DAY after.