ManBearPig
half man half bearpig
Parker would go crazy on the warriors without curry
Do the warriors need Stephen Curry for the Spurs?
- Thread starter Supercoolmayo
- Start date
Even that neanderthal @The Taxman wouldn't make a thread this ignorant.
When? I know youre not talking about years ago. Smh
Reid2Achieve
Superstar
They would get locked up. Curry breaks the defense. Without him, Klay would get bottled up by Kawhi.
BK The Great
Veteran
even though Golden State are the current champs they can't sleep on them. they might be faster & younger but Spurs are far more experienced and been around the championship run far more than. just remember the Spurs dethroned the unstoppable Heat back in 2014.
Do you watch basketball? They beat them during the regular season playing their final 20 games or something like that.
Curry was healthy and they lost handily.
G-Zeus
G-Zeus Chrystler...the brehsident
Yeah curry will clamp Parker up
Curry would provide only one thing.... More fire..more.fire
1 game? Stfu
ManBearPig
half man half bearpig
That's like asking if the 2012 heat could take down the Th
Parker will Reserve his energy more
Yeah curry will clamp Parker up
Curry would provide only one thing.... More fire..more.fire
Parker will Reserve his energy more
Don't get mad because you're an idiot. You said earlier they hadn't beat the Spurs in years, when in fact the season before this one the Spurs won the season series.
Like I said, the Spurs can beat the Warriors WITH Curry, so I definitely don't see the Warriors winning a series against the Spurs without Curry. The Warriors are fortunate they didn't have to face a healthy Clippers team instead of the Blazers, or else we wouldn't even be having this conversation.