Do the warriors need Stephen Curry for the Spurs?

Reid2Achieve

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
6,035
Reputation
660
Daps
13,233
Reppin
Atlanta
They would get locked up. Curry breaks the defense. Without him, Klay would get bottled up by Kawhi.
 

FaTaL

Veteran
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
106,465
Reputation
5,479
Daps
212,151
Reppin
NULL
Warriors don't have enough consistent offense without steph
 

BK The Great

Veteran
Joined
Nov 21, 2015
Messages
63,316
Reputation
7,867
Daps
156,727
Reppin
BK NY
even though Golden State are the current champs they can't sleep on them. they might be faster & younger but Spurs are far more experienced and been around the championship run far more than. just remember the Spurs dethroned the unstoppable Heat back in 2014.
 

Doomsday

Superstar
Joined
Feb 19, 2014
Messages
10,388
Reputation
2,634
Daps
24,975
When? I know youre not talking about years ago. Smh

Do you watch basketball? They beat them during the regular season playing their final 20 games or something like that.

Curry was healthy and they lost handily.
 

Doomsday

Superstar
Joined
Feb 19, 2014
Messages
10,388
Reputation
2,634
Daps
24,975
1 game? Stfu

Don't get mad because you're an idiot. You said earlier they hadn't beat the Spurs in years, when in fact the season before this one the Spurs won the season series.

Like I said, the Spurs can beat the Warriors WITH Curry, so I definitely don't see the Warriors winning a series against the Spurs without Curry. The Warriors are fortunate they didn't have to face a healthy Clippers team instead of the Blazers, or else we wouldn't even be having this conversation.
 
Top