Do the warriors need Stephen Curry for the Spurs?

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

Do you watch basketball? They beat them during the regular season playing their final 20 games or something like that.

Curry was healthy and they lost handily.

Well we know you clearly don't.

 

[Doomsday]

Well we know you clearly don't.

Oh was that your sock puppet?

Shut the fucc up bytch before I really run up to your house and bust your head.

 

[Thegospel]

Don't get mad because you're an idiot. You said earlier they hadn't beat the Spurs in years, when in fact the season before this one the Spurs won the season series.

Like I said, the Spurs can beat the Warriors WITH Curry, so I definitely don't see the Warriors winning a series against the Spurs without Curry. The Warriors are fortunate they didn't have to face a healthy Clippers team instead of the Blazers, or else we wouldn't even be having this conversation.

im not mad at your clown ass. fukk outta here lame.

 

[PhonZhi]

Spurs would have beaten them LAST year

 

[Doomsday]

im not mad at your clown ass. fukk outta here lame.

Stay mad at me bytch because you don't know shyt about basketball.

 

[DlAMONDZ]

Do you watch basketball? They beat them during the regular season playing their final 20 games or something like that.

Curry was healthy and they lost handily.

Spurs beat them sure. But handily?

 

[Thegospel]

Don't get mad because you're an idiot. You said earlier they hadn't beat the Spurs in years, when in fact the season before this one the Spurs won the season series.

Like I said, the Spurs can beat the Warriors WITH Curry, so I definitely don't see the Warriors winning a series against the Spurs without Curry. The Warriors are fortunate they didn't have to face a healthy Clippers team instead of the Blazers, or else we wouldn't even be having this conversation.

And Clippers are lucky Steph got hurt in the first damn place.