You act like this theorem is on solid scientific ground, when it isn't. It isn't co-signed by evolutionists or scientists.
Your watchmaker argument was being debunked back in ancient greece my dude.
Do you know what DNA is made up of and how it is formed and how it has changed over the entire course of evolution gradually getting more and more complex as organisms evolved? It's not like DNA is some mystical substance that could've only come from the gods. DNA is made up of nucleotides, a phosphate group, a sugar group and a nitrogen base. These things were formed by naturalistic processes, not a snap of the fingers.
Anyone who believes intelligent design has no room to call other people dumb.
1) My whole point (which you clearly missed) was to mock the length taken to expound on this this infinite monkey theorem to potentially explain odds of order evolving from chaos is ridiculous. Reality was quite different, same like no man alive has seen a monkey turn into a man. Could you imagine me debating with you how if I could get a billion monkeys, and put enough bricks around them, that however miniscule, there is a chance they could randomly put the bricks together in a way as to construct a house?

You would look at me like
2) Nobody said anything about DNA being mystical. There are too many mathematical consistencies in nature. The golden ratio. Pi. Force/acceleration ratio. Velocity/distance ratio. Energy/mass ratio. There's too many laws, for anything to be created by an infinite amount of monkeys. The helical structure of DNA itself is a thing of beauty, prevents loss of information (redundancy), and the helical structure miniaturizes the space needed for cells. How anybody can look at it and claim it the pairings and the structure is by chance (by an infinite number of monkeys) is beyond me
You know what's weird, it's the intelligent people who should realize the genius in nature, and the dumb people who should not believe in a Creator. Twilight zone is real y'all
