Yes, yes it does. For all Obama's and Hiliary's(and Sanders') faults electing a republican president at the moment would a calamity. Dozens of millions would lose healthcare, the post office would be sold, infrastructure would rot further, food stamps would be cut to the bone, TANF(which is pure shyt already) would likely be reformed even worse, Medicare would almost certainly be cut heavily, social security might even be privatized.
On foreign policy I don't think electing a reasonable republican would be that much worse than electing Hiliary or another Obama term. I fully expect large scale intervention in Syria(or Iraq or Afghanistan) out of anyone who's elected president next regardless of serious changes in the situation or someone like Paul or Sander's magically getting elected.
But to get back to the domestic politics, electing a republican would be effectively allowing a far right reactionary party to have complete control over the political process. You'll probably get fukked by a Clinton presidency, but it's not close to the kind of ruin a Bush or Carson or Rubio or Cruz could bring about.
On foreign policy I don't think electing a reasonable republican would be that much worse than electing Hiliary or another Obama term. I fully expect large scale intervention in Syria(or Iraq or Afghanistan) out of anyone who's elected president next regardless of serious changes in the situation or someone like Paul or Sander's magically getting elected.
But to get back to the domestic politics, electing a republican would be effectively allowing a far right reactionary party to have complete control over the political process. You'll probably get fukked by a Clinton presidency, but it's not close to the kind of ruin a Bush or Carson or Rubio or Cruz could bring about.

