All this is fine, and true. The only thing I dispute is there being a culture of rape. A culture of bystanders who let bad situations take place...sure

But that goes for most crimes.
Even if people suspect, they don't act. Some of it reasonable, some of it pure negligence.
In my dictionary culture is defined as "the attitudes and behavior characteristic of a particular social group". And I'll talk about the attitude/behavior surrounding rape but first let me say that I do agree that bystanders letting bad situations take place happens all the time, after all no one wants to get caught in the crossfire of a violent crime (specifically robbery/murder/kidnapping where weapons may be involved) and up until now people had no way of doing anything about it. That is until iphones and galaxys came into play, so even now in the 21st century the circumstances surrounding violent crimes have drastically changed. We even got criminals snitching on they own damn selves for the whole world to see.

Well where rape is concerned the nature of the bystander's silence is slightly different as exposed on my prior example:
"...because she and you know that if she goes to the cops
y'all gon' have several witnesses saying "Oh yeah, they left the club together all hugged up. Hope lil'homie got it in.
"
I finished of that example specifically that way because the nature of the bystander's silence to a possible rape isn't a natural fear of harm to the self, but of a misreading of the situation taking place due to established societal ideals surrounding "certain types" of women.
To say there is a culture is to say we are all complicit in this happening, when as a society(half being women) we don't condone rape. Individual instances of said act does not mean that nobody would have stepped into a situation, like one with a girl who has had to many and the vultures come in.
You're very right that as a society we do not condone outright rape. I dare say we actually demand castration and executions for all outright violent rapists (here I'm talking about the sex crazed, find a woman in the ally and fight her to the ground type of rapist), BUT we feel
vastly different about quasi-rape. By quasi rape – which make no mistake is rape nonetheless – I'm talking about the type of rape in which the rapist doesn't actually outright attack victim but instead takes his/her time luring the victim to a situation she's not even expecting.
In fact, the quasi rapist can even go as far as rationalizing his actions by deciding that if the woman has been lured by his tactics, then
she must be familiar with them (the slut) and thus not in a position to react negatively against them should she finally find herself alone with him.
Speaking of instances where you saw people take a drunk chick out, did you interject??? I have done so, twice on behalf of strangers (one happened to be with her boyfriend) and a few times
cause of ditsy female friends I kept. Mind you, everyone sees an event differently. The guy in front of the two saw a dude rushing a drunk chick out the bar...the guy to the side saw a chick
being helped by a guy who knew she had too many...a guy from behind can not see anything out of the norm, because he might very well be doing the same thing with his buddies when the
girls they are with drink too much. Clear-cut examples aren't the ones that happen most often, so predators win when there is doubt about intentions, especially if EVERYONE in the bar is drinking.
Who really is assuming anyone is there to harm anyone?
When I witnessed my first case of quasi-rape I inherently felt something slimy was happening (as I'm sure you've felt too before) but I did not interfere. I let it go because "it wasn't my business". I was young and in my mind that was just how the world worked. I wasn't afraid of the dude. I felt he was a bit too pushy, but the girl only just seemed embarrassed; she did not push him away or scream anything. At all. Now as an adult I suspect she felt that even if she said something I wouldn't have done shyt and she'd just be called a hoe. I can't quite tell it happened so long ago.
Upon becoming an adult and more knowledgeable of the world of men I did interject on behalf of the women I knew, and even one stranger myself.
You're of course very right that predators win when there is doubt about intentions. But I go further and say that predators win not only when the doubt is felt by their victims, but also when the doubt is felt by us the bystanders. Which is why interjecting should perhaps be more common, a simple: "Y'all are a cute couple!" can allow for a better reading of the situation even if the predator cuts the victim off before they can say something. Or even a "are you okay miss?" in case one isn't sure of just how drunk a chick is. Dudes may be a little too quick to simply decide "nah that ain't my issue

" when something
questionable happens right in front of them, and that's what needs to change.
Even an interjection of your best friend trying to hit on that chick at that house-party that is beyond drunk can stop a fukked up situation from happening.
Who really is assuming anyone is there to harm anyone? It's like saying "Teach men not to rape." Well, teach murderers not to murder...teach thieves not to steal...etc.
I would never say that teaching men not to rape is the same as teaching men not to steal/murder. Simply because there's levels to this rape shyt that society just wasn't addressing – such as the quasi-rape issue – until recently. Society barely has to teach men how to not force a woman to have sex at gun/knife point. But pills/alcohol/surprise-trains were not a part of the rape discourse until now. That you must admit.
See how asinine that sounds? Now you can say "Exercise judgment, before and after you drink, so you don't get yourself into a situation where you might cross the line with a lady."
And then they might call it victim blaming, but if you are out drinking and don't have a support system that will keep you straight if you do too much, you are open to the off chance that
either
A: some nut comes and takes what he wants
or
B: A drunk guy comes along, you both make a poor decision, and at the end, you both don't really know what went down.
Exercising judgement isn't the issue as much as society checking itself on the assumptions it makes towards women who get taken advantage of. You yourself are a staple of the coli's existence as a poster (due to just how much you've contributed since the beginning) so I know that you know how some brehs over here view certain women as sluts and deserving of being...what's that term? "turned out". A saying that has heavy rape connotations if you're paying attention.
Remember, rape is USUALLY committed by someone who is familiar with the victim, so it might not even be a chance for others to intervene, much like my mother.
It was a family member.
Because rape is usually committed by someone familiar is why the discourse on "just how expansive rape is" is finally happening. If things keep up the way they are, hopefully in the 2100 little girls as young as 12/14 won't have to listen to their mothers call them sluts and decide to not believe the "

" when the child tells them how they were propositioned/touched by a step-father, uncle. 'Cause sometimes it really be like that right now.