They did a feature on Lesnar winning at UFC. It’s good that they did it, but then they got completely carried away. They called him the best fighter in the world. The problem with that is a large percentage of the WWE audience watched the fight and knows that’s bullshyt so why even say it. Next they said he dominated all three rounds, when he actually lost the second and didn’t dominate the first. Then they called him the greatest combat athlete in this country’s history. Yes, like he’s better than Dan Gable, Cael Sanderson, Muhammad Ali, Sugar Ray Robinson. There’s exaggerations and hype and there’s just killing the credibility of the announcer, and in this case, one of the big issues is that the announcers have no credibility and that’s why they have such a hard time getting personalities and angles over to where people really care about them. This was as bad as when Striker claimed Swagger was a Heisman Trophy candidate. If nobody saw it they could say it and get away with it, but why do you want to tell people outright who have seen it that you’re completely full of shyt and carnies.

getting wrestled fukked to a decision was the GOAT at one point. And on and on. You always hype whoever is the hottest as the GOAT in any combat sport. Dave taking it literally to the point of getting upset that WWE would bill Brock ass the GOAT fighter is just bizarre on every level. They billed him like that when he returned to WWE coming off of two dominating losses in a row, and people bought because he's fukking Brock Lesnar.
But they call Cena the greatest WWE Champion of all time openly now without being subtle about it...why isn't he complaining about that?