mastermind
Rest In Power Kobe
Delete
Draymond is better than him and I’m tired of Rodman being brought up in these discussion.
Draymond is more impactful and has more to his game than both.Should Tyson Chandler be a Hall of Famer then? How bout Artest or Michael Cooper?
Hall of Famers are the best of the best. Hall of Famers carry their squads and do the heavy lifting. Role players do not belong in the Hall of Fame. You guys want to devalue the Hall even more than it already is. Might as well put Iguodala in there too.Draymond is more impactful and has more to his game than both.
Also, and very important, Draymond is the leader of the Warriors. That wasn’t true for Chandler or Cooper.
Draymond is a HOFer.
Dennis Rodman, half the 60s Celtics, Bill Bradley, Bobby Jones etc. are already in the HOF.Hall of Famers are the best of the best. Hall of Famers carry their squads and do the heavy lifting. Role players do not belong in the Hall of Fame. You guys want to devalue the Hall even more than it already is. Might as well put Iguodala in there too.
This is such an utterly laughable argument.
Draymond is more impactful and has more to his game than both.
Also, and very important, Draymond is the leader of the Warriors. That wasn’t true for Chandler or Cooper.
Draymond is a HOFer.
Draymond is an all time great role player the type of player whose exact skillset could have fit into any great team at any point in history. Plug him in for Ron Harper and the 96 Bulls are going 76-6. Pick a team, any team they all get better with a guy that has his IQ on both ends of the floor his problem is that he's dependent on the guys around him executing but he sets the table on both ends excellently. He can only do so much but what he does raises ceilings. His mouth is what people hate and they let it spill over into his game. The Coli's like that Dame got bumped up to Steph's level here because guys just fukk with him as a person. Draymond was out here shytting on actual superstars and legends and guys felt the need to "remind" him (because its not like he's actually reading this) that he's just a water carrier.
First, it was the first Spurs title, as in one. Avery Johnson didn’t win a single accolade in his career. Draymond was the leader of a dynasty team. It’s not the same.Avery Johnson was the leader of the early Spurs 'chip teams. He's not in the Hall. Neither Shaq nor Kobe were the leader of their 00-02 teams. The leader of the team is not always the best player.
Ron Harper was not a 20 ppg scorer for the Bulls.And Ron Harper was 20ppg (4 & 5) scorer that you had to pay attention to.
Damn people already forgot the Warriors dynasty?
Draymond was such a huge catalyst to their success. Easy HOFer in my opinion.