So why are the other 2 children not being “groomed to be gay”? I could maybe understand that point if all 3 were, but they’re not. Only 1. What makes this one child so special that they need to specifically groom him?
Why are you asking me? I'm not in their house. I don't know why they only took the 11 year old to a gay pride parade.
No need to lie either. You're not trying to understand any point that opposes the gay agenda. You're pro-gay agenda just like most black women.
I wouldn’t take my child to a pride parade. I agree with that.
But I’m still waiting on people to tell me what else they should be doing. Locking him in the room? Force a big ass child to dress a certain way? Beat him? They’re letting him be himself. My son knows that gay people exist, and he still likes girls. This child is old enough to know what he likes.
Y'all need to cut the shyt. You said it yourself. What they(Wade and Gabriel) should be doing is refraining from making this kid's sexuality public information. They're using this kid to push the gay agenda and to get fake props from white liberals. Whether the kid is gay or not is nobody's business. He's not even old enough to fully understand his own sexuality. Adults outting children as gay/trans publicly is a form of child abuse because kids aren't capable of making those kind of life decisions. This whole issue is proof that people only arbitrarily believe in age of consent laws. How can you agree that people under 17-18 aren't old enough to consent to sex because at those ages folk aren't mentally and emotionally capable of dealing with sex, yet an 11 year old can consent to being gay or transgender? That's a blantant contradiction.
The acceptance and eventual normalization of pedophilia in this society is inevitable. Situations like this and Charlize Theron being praised for outting her 7-8 year old adopted son as trans is proof. You people will sacrifice your kids to push your own selfish agendas.
People making comments like “promote your son taking dikk up the ass brehs” are gross and out of line. No need to speak about a child that way.
Whining about this forum being politically incorrect when you've been posting here for years is silly. Plus it's clear that you don't really give a fukk about the child when you're condoning him being outted publicly as gay at 11. The reality is that Wade is promoting his son in that way and it's irresponsible. People wouldn't be making comments like that had Wade and Gabriel not put his son out here as being a little princess boy.
I’m not deflecting anything. I know the conversation first stemmed from Wade’s thoughts about the Pride situation in which I’ve already voiced my opinion about that (I disagree w/the child being there).. the second part of my post was about the overarching convo going on in this thread about adolescent sexuality and social norms regarding femininity and masculinity as it pertains to young growing men. I don’t think they’re grooming Zion to cultivate feminine characteristics nor denouncing his behavior/mannerisms, but simply accepting it for what it is. The candid picture was just a view of normalcy it seems for Zion to ‘be himself’ around his siblings who seem to be normal hetero/masculine boys
You're being disingenuous because they're clearly encouraging/celebrating him being a feminine acting boy. Now it looks like they're taken it a step further by putting the man out to the world as gay at 11. If publicly taking an 11 year older to a gay pride parade isn't grooming and encouraging the child to be gay then what is? Why didn't they take all of his sons to the gay pride thing?