number21
Strive for rulership not equality, black man.
fukk up, ya goofy fakkit.
Dwayne Wade On Supporting 11 Year Old Son At Pride
- Thread starter Homeboy Runny-Ray
- Start date
Apprentice
RIP Doughboy Roc
Rollo Goodlove
Palestine Titty
Taste da rainbow 
Bruh......
Imagine that fruit cup nikka calling you daddy
Bruh......
Imagine that fruit cup nikka calling you daddy
Rollo Goodlove
Palestine Titty
Zion gone open a hairshop in Miami ..... they gone call him Mistuh Zion
Dad on the road 24 7Still waiting on someone to explain how this is Gabbys fault? She has more control over the child than his own father? Make it make sense
Gabby putting this little nikka in tutus
What none of you has factored in is dwades genes, this kid gonna end up built like Westbrook but gay
Rockstar Mom
PhatGurlSwag
I doubt she’s dressing an 11 yr old. I have an 11 yr old. They definitely dress themselves.Dad on the road 24 7
Gabby putting this little nikka in tutus
What none of you has factored in is dwades genes, this kid gonna end up built like Westbrook but gay
And again, she’s just the stepmom. On the road or not, I’m sure if Dwayne has a problem with it, it wouldn’t be happening. But we clearly see he doesn’t care......
mortuus est
Veteran
because people have nothing better to do and would rather judge another persons choices and actions
Homeboy Runny-Ray
From Around The Way
more than likely bred that way, he aint come out the womb like that.. your other cousins had influence in him doing that, encouraging it probably
when your 5 year old cousin tried on his cousins heels or purse or some shyt or whatever of the like, it was up to your cousins to say thats not how boys act, instead they probably clapped and said look at him being cute and expressing himself and well there ya go
kids are impressionable.. if you encourage their behavior, any behavior, they could be robbing stores of now and laters or starburst at age of 6 and 7 and if you dont check them on it theyll think thats fine behavior.. instead we just call that the cycle of poverty and poor living conditions, but this is some how not a cycle of gay enabling ?
If a boy puts on heels or messes with make up and you tell him its fine, he'll think its fine... if you tell him he shouldnt be doing that, then he wont be doing that.. and thats that...
IsThatBrothaMouzone?
Veteran
??????????????????
Are you implying Gabby met this kid today ??
Surely you can think harder than that you are better than that you know Gabby been around this kid since he was young enough to do what @killacal was saying
I just checked, Gabby been with Wade since 2009, the kid would only bel ike 2-3 years old then
I know you can think more critically than what you just posted
Demonic??????????????????
Are you implying Gabby met this kid today ??
Surely you can think harder than that you are better than that you know Gabby been around this kid since he was young enough to do what @killacal was saying
I just checked, Gabby been with Wade since 2009, the kid would only bel ike 2-3 years old then
I know you can think more critically than what you just posted
11 years old = 6th grade.
I had a girl in 6th grade.
I got head in 6th grade.
I was in love in 4th grade.
Kim with the fatty
We would make fun of gay people in 6th grade. We knew if we we're straight or gay by then.
Y'all tripping....y'all hate black men and black women on here.
Y'all care so much about strangers lives on here.
Let that boy live. He ain't hurting no one.
I had a girl in 6th grade.
I got head in 6th grade.
I was in love in 4th grade.
Kim with the fatty
We would make fun of gay people in 6th grade. We knew if we we're straight or gay by then.
Y'all tripping....y'all hate black men and black women on here.
Y'all care so much about strangers lives on here.
Let that boy live. He ain't hurting no one.
Pull Up the Roots
Breakfast for dinner.
Not only are you quoting Paul Ramsey - a racist alt-right personality - you're quoting PJMedia too and McHugh's bullshyt? Figures that you're one of those types.
This site has a comprehensive take-down of his junk science: https://www.hrc.org/mchughexposed
Here's another take down, In 'Sun' op-ed, Johns Hopkins faculty members disavow report on gender, sexuality
"Several Johns Hopkins University faculty members authored a Baltimore Sun op-ed in which they express concerns about a recent report that they say mischaracterizes the current state of science on gender and sexuality.
They note that the report, "Sexuality and Gender: Findings from the Biological and Psychological and Social Sciences," was "not published in the scientific literature, where it would have been subject to rigorous peer review prior to publication. It purports to detail the science of this area, but it falls short of being a comprehensive review."
The report, published last month by The New Atlantis, was co-authored by Paul R. McHugh, a professor of psychiatry at Johns Hopkins University's School of Medicine; and Lawrence S. Mayer, an Arizona State statistician who formerly held faculty appointments at JHU.
Among its more controversial assertions: That there is no scientific evidence to support the idea that sexual orientation is a biologically fixed property; that is, homosexual people are not "born that way." With regards to transgender people, McHugh and Mayer suggest "a skeptical view toward the claim that sex-reassignment procedures provide the hoped-for benefits."
In their op-ed, Chris Beyrer, Robert W. Blum, and Tonia C. Poteat—all faculty members at JHU's Bloomberg School of Public Health—dispute those and other conclusions in the report. Six other JHU faculty members also contributed to the op-ed, The Sun notes."
Still waiting on that recent MIT study too.