Eartha Kitt was out here with James Dean and Paul Newman...at the same damn time

[OsO]

All men do is pressure women to have sex, then degrade women who have sex.

You n*ggas are idiots.

 

[Gold]

smh..and that dumb azz twitter byatch acting like it was a phenomonal thing for Eartha Kitt to have a train ran on her by white hollywood guys

My first thought too....

 

[Neuromancer]

old school c00nin

 

[feelosofer]

Look Eartha Kitt could do what she liked and at least she was honest about her sexual experiences, I'm more disturbed by Black women making their life goal to be a sex object to two white men.

 

[StickStickly]

"Sexual freedom"

These women will find any reason to justify being a hoe.

You guys want to have sex with women but you don’t want women to have sex.

 

[Gravity]

You guys want to have sex with women but you don’t want women to have sex.

Men want to have sex with women, we just don’t want to wife women who have sex with a lot of men. Where’s the contradiction?

 

[StickStickly]

I bet they wouldn't have felt that way if it was 2 black men

Eartha probably did have two black men at the same time at some point.

I don’t know why anyone is surprised that black celebrities -Eartha, Sammy, Sydney Portier, Dorothy Dandridge- they all had white partners and were trying to assimilate into white America. It was the culture at the time. No one was around saying it’s okay to be black yet.

 

[StickStickly]

Men want to have sex with women, we just do t respect women who have sex with a lot of men. Where’s the contradiction?

The contradiction is not expecting women to have varying sexual appetites but allowing men the freedom to go where their bodies want them without repercussion. You tie in a woman’s societal value to how many sex partners she’s had as if that’s the only thing about her that matters. People can understand why a man wants a variety of partners, but claim women cannot or should not have that same desire. From a rational standpoint, human biologies are so different, it’s ridiculous to assume it can’t or shouldn’t exist. earlier someone was trying to claim biological reasons for male promiscuity and female monogamy when in reality a lot of women want to be monogamous, a lot of women want serial monogamy, a lot of women want different simultaneous partners, and some women are somewhere between all of the above depending on their bodies. It’s up to you whether you want a woman who has had a lot of partners- I get not wanting that. I don’t want a man who thinks he has to cheat or who has had dozens of women either. However I don’t own all men and if you want to sleep around I get it. That’s your life and your needs. It won’t affect how I see you until you treat people poorly. At least Eartha wasn’t cheating on people. That affects integrity to me. She was an outspoken anti war advocate. That’s respectful in itself.

 

[Rakim Allah]

Her dad was white though, just like Meghan Markle.

It's still unconfirmed her father was white. But her mom was raped by a white man.

 

[CodeBlaMeVi]

I’m truly liberal when it comes to sex so ehh...

She did hers.

“Marcusssssss”””

Lady Elouise

 

[Gravity]

The contradiction is not expecting women to have varying sexual appetites but allowing men the freedom to go where their bodies want them without repercussion.

This makes no sense. People are ALLOWED to do whatever they want. Women are allowed to have whatever sexual appetite that they choose to have without systematic repercussions just like men are.

You’re trying to frame personal preference as a repercussion. You’re trying to shame men for our personal preferences. Not valuing promiscuity in potential long term female partners is our personal preference and it’s not our fault that women don’t share it. Women don’t look down on promiscuous men. Women’s general preference to not look down on promiscuous men doesn’t make our general preference a contradiction. Men and women are different.

You tie in a woman’s societal value to how many sex partners she’s had as if that’s the only thing about her that matters.

This is a lie. I don’t tie a woman’s societal value to how many sex partners she’s had nor do I pretend as if that’s the only thing that matters about a woman. This is a straw man.

Now I do tie a woman’s value as a potential life partner heavily to how she lives her personal life which obviously includes how many people she has slept with. I think that’s perfectly fair. Again, it’s not men’s fault that women have different priorities when evaluating men as life partners. Men and women are different.

People can understand why a man wants a variety of partners, but claim women cannot or should not have that same desire. From a rational standpoint, human biologies are so different, it’s ridiculous to assume it can’t or shouldn’t exist. earlier someone was trying to claim biological reasons for male promiscuity and female monogamy when in reality a lot of women want to be monogamous, a lot of women want serial monogamy, a lot of women want different simultaneous partners, and some women are somewhere between all of the above depending on their bodies. It’s up to you whether you want a woman who has had a lot of partners- I get not wanting that. I don’t want a man who thinks he has to cheat or who has had dozens of women either. However I don’t own all men and if you want to sleep around I get it. That’s your life and your needs. It won’t affect how I see you until you treat people poorly. At least Eartha wasn’t cheating on people. That affects integrity to me. She was an outspoken anti war advocate. That’s respectful in itself.

Again, you’re creating a bit of a straw man here. It’s not about dictating what women can or can’t do. Women can do whatever they want. You just seem frustrated that men don’t see the world like you see it as a woman. This all boils down to men looking down on promiscuity in women and women not looking down on promiscuity in men. With this eartha kitt story there’s an extra layer when you take race into account.

I think the negative reaction from black men is almost exclusively about the positive reaction from black women. If it weren’t for those tweets celebrating the rumor on “yaaaaaaasss Queen eartha” shyt, this wouldn’t even be a thread. Remember, we just had the thing with some black women living through the chic who got engaged to the uk cracker. This bed wenching by proxy stuff is becoming more rampant.

 

[Bart simpson]

Eartha Kitt got turned into a rotisserie chicken by 2 dude at once. why idolize that part out of the things she done in her life.

...

 

[newworldafro]

Sammy Davis Junior wanted to put a ring on it and make her wifey but she rather be the white man's whore


Our Black Queens yall


#GMB

in those pics she looks mildly interested.....damn, hate it had to be Sammy

Edit: Didn't realize Sammy was with TeamSatanist (if true). I thought he just converted to Jud.......wait nevermind.

I aint never had a broad say my stroke game was "celestial"

You get points if she said "Rock my world", which is also acceptable...

 

[Sonic Boom of the South]

Yo so females hype over that

James Deen n Paul Newman were gay

So they was putting their feces covered dikks in her

And hoes talmbout #GOALS

 

[Uchiha God]

so weird that people see these quotes as something to aspire to. twitter has created some really twisted individuals

but just for clarification, where are these quotes from? i just wanna verify their validity as often people on twitter make shyt up and it spreads like wildfire