And everyone thought it was ridiculous two teams that good met in the first round.Best series in the entire playoffs last year was 1st round Clips vs. Spurs.![]()

And everyone thought it was ridiculous two teams that good met in the first round.Best series in the entire playoffs last year was 1st round Clips vs. Spurs.![]()

nikka I don't care about some 80s mavs. Now, are the teams of the 90s better then today? Yes or no?

"I don't care" is a cop out.nikka I don't care about some 80s mavs. Now, are the teams of the 90s better then today? Yes or no?
Mavs were better than the 90s Pacers or Knicks. Care to prove your point niqqa.i mean, what do those knicks teams do with the pacers from a couple years back, or last years hawks? let alone cleveland.No, the teams from the 90s were not better than today.
The Knicks in 92-93 won 60 games with Charles Smith as their 3rd leading scorer![]()
There is absolutely no logic in your argument and we both know it.
That "we're not talking about players, we're talking about the teams they played on" just sounds straight ridiculous

Your argument not mines


"I don't care" is a cop out.
You used me bringing them up as better than the 90s squads to smear me and when backed to a corner, you're bring out the caring meter because YOU CANT SAY the 90s Pacers or Knicks wer better
fukk yOur caring. No one asked you to care. Prove a point. Prove how I'm wrong that the 80![]()
Mavs were better than the 90s Pacers or Knicks. Care to prove your point niqqa.
You bring up some individual stats like thats suppose to mean something. How many finals appearance? How many top seeds? You criticize me for praising the pacers for playing Jordan hard when you do the same with an 80s mavs squad.No, the teams from the 90s were not better than today.
The Knicks in 92-93 won 60 games with Charles Smith as their 3rd leading scorer
90s teams were top heavy without a lot of depth, you got dudes who should be starters coming off benches today.
They didn't play the Celtics

EVERYBODY'S argument. Even the niqqas I'm not agreeing with in here are making a team argument.Your argument not mines![]()
i brought up stats in a team play argument i.e. Speaking on a player amongst a group of players that made up the DallasYou bring up some individual stats like thats suppose to mean something. How many finals appearance? How many top seeds? You criticize me for praising the pacers for playing Jordan hard when you do the same with an 80s mavs squad.
Mavs. Dude brought up individual stats ALONE..I should have clarified that. I meant the 90s EC teams vs todays. You think the quality of the east today is comparable to the 90s?
Meanwhle....the 80sIt's about the same, the only problem is that the 2nd and 3rd best EC teams got injured at the worst time.
The Heat have more talent than the Knicks, Pacers, Hornets, Hawks and Magic of the 90s. The Magic had Shaq and Penny, and that's about it, Scott, Grant and Anderson were all completely dependent on Shaq/Penny setting them up.
Mavs had four players in their line up that could create their own shots.....but let's not say they were better before dudes turn that into a more memorable debate.EVERYBODY'S argument. Even the niqqas I'm not agreeing with in here are making a team argument.
fukk outta here making it a back of the jersey argument.
i brought up stats in a team play argument i.e. Speaking on a player amongst a group of players that made up the Dallas![]()
Mavs. Dude brought up individual stats ALONE..
fukk outta here. Your debating skills are subpar and fulla flaws.