Ebola virus in Guinea ‘most aggressive, near totally fatal’

OneManGang

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
19,832
Reputation
4,820
Daps
79,050
Didnt they say bats are a natural host of the eboli. And the same is a delicacy in Guniea
I'm not sure of the bolded, but i have read that bats in that area are natural reservoirs of the ebola virus. There is some data to suggest it is found in some parts of Asia as well, though there hasnt been any significant outbreak there as yet. The issue is not eating the animals though, its the preparation of them. Cooked food removes many pathogens but while preparing you can imagine the mixing of blood and skin and any open wounds can let blood mix etc. Also monkeys eat the bat droppings and in turn humans eat the monkey. That has been a proposed transmission route.
 
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
8,291
Reputation
3,070
Daps
23,126
The news here just glazes over this gut whats the update, is the rate of infection still high or have they somewhat contained it?

I hear alot of countries in that pocket have closed borders halted trade etc.
 

OneManGang

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
19,832
Reputation
4,820
Daps
79,050
They claim it is bushmeat, which is plausible, but why Africa is so prone to disease from bushmeat and Asia and South America aren't is a bit questionable.
People forget about how many people died from SARS and bird flu. None of those were traced back to Africa. Nipah virus killed mad people throughout Asia/Australia and that was traced back to Malaysians not preparing their pig properly from farms that were eating bat droppings.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
332,723
Reputation
-34,446
Daps
637,545
Reppin
The Deep State
They claim it is bushmeat, which is plausible, but why Africa is so prone to disease from bushmeat and Asia and South America aren't is a bit questionable.
Because certain animals harbor it.

Its just the reason.

Some species are more vulnerable to things than others. Its the same reason why monkeys are vulnerable to Reston virus (non-pathogenic in humans) although its a "cousin" of ebola
 

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,412
Reputation
15,484
Daps
246,421
Because certain animals harbor it.

Its just the reason.

Some species are more vulnerable to things than others. Its the same reason why monkeys are vulnerable to Reston virus (non-pathogenic in humans) although its a "cousin" of ebola

Ebola, sure, but this isn't credible with SIV/HIV/Aids :comeon:
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
332,723
Reputation
-34,446
Daps
637,545
Reppin
The Deep State
Ebola, sure, but this isn't credible with SIV/HIV/Aids :comeon:
Its plenty credible.

SIV mutates rapidly and all it takes is the right version to inflect a human. There have probably been tons of cases where non-pathogenic forms of SIV or FIV (and theres cow and mice versions too) were in humans but didn't cause disease.

I really think you need to look into a few courses on how viruses work and mutate.
 

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,412
Reputation
15,484
Daps
246,421
Its plenty credible.

SIV mutates rapidly and all it takes is the right version to inflect a human. There have probably been tons of cases where non-pathogenic forms of SIV or FIV (and theres cow and mice versions too) were in humans but didn't cause disease.

I really think you need to look into a few courses on how viruses work and mutate.

Yah I'm not buying the story on how it crossed over. Sounds like a racist's wet dream.
 
Top