Eddie Long out here with "dem boyz" again...:mjpls:

[Thsnnor]

????????????????

Goddamn dude. Do you not realize this is NOT how the burden of proof works?

Everything I have seen regarding ANY religion has NOT been substantiated.

What do you not understand here?

I asked one question and have gotten more ducks and dodges than a Mayweather fight. This is not about burden of proof, not about making a case, not an argument.

This is about what you have seen that made you say Meh, not good enough for me. That is it, nothing more, nothing less.

Someone asks why you don't do or why you do something you give them evidence as to why. I don't eat there cause the cooks don't wash their hands and the food is spoiled, I'm not flying on that airline cause I work for them and they cut costs, I don't believe in that cause the guy who founded it was a fraud and it was a ponzi scheme or I took a look at their prospectus and it is full of holes and their numbers have been falsified.

It's easy to summarize your opinion about the evidence you have looked at and judged.

I'm not going to chase you. Either you'll give an answer or not. You seem to think I'm trying to get some inside info or something. If one of the wise elderly cats in the hood ask you where you stand you want to yell at them to state your case and this is not how it goes.

If you answer cool if not cool either way I'm done and will let you be.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

I asked one question and have gotten more ducks and dodges than a Mayweather fight. This is not about burden of proof, not about making a case, not an argument.

This is about what you have seen that made you say Meh, not good enough for me. That is it, nothing more, nothing less.

Someone asks why you don't do or why you do something you give them evidence as to why. I don't eat there cause the cooks don't wash their hands and the food is spoiled, I'm not flying on that airline cause I work for them and they cut costs, I don't believe in that cause the guy who founded it was a fraud and it was a ponzi scheme or I took a look at their prospectus and it is full of holes and their numbers have been falsified.

It's easy to summarize your opinion about the evidence you have looked at and judged.

I'm not going to chase you. Either you'll give an answer or not. You seem to think I'm trying to get some inside info or something. If one of the wise elderly cats in the hood ask you where you stand you want to yell at them to state your case and this is not how it goes.

If you answer cool if not cool either way I'm done and will let you be.

In my 20+ years of obtaining a formal education, in addition to countless books, movies, traveling experiences, lectures, and conversations, I have not come across any evidence validating any religious claims of ANY sort, or convincing arguments that would influence me to submit to believing any theological assertion.

PERIOD.​

Why does this answer not suffice?

If you want me to accept religious claims, why can't they make better arguments?

 

[Robbie3000]

I asked one question and have gotten more ducks and dodges than a Mayweather fight. This is not about burden of proof, not about making a case, not an argument.

This is about what you have seen that made you say Meh, not good enough for me. That is it, nothing more, nothing less.

Someone asks why you don't do or why you do something you give them evidence as to why. I don't eat there cause the cooks don't wash their hands and the food is spoiled, I'm not flying on that airline cause I work for them and they cut costs, I don't believe in that cause the guy who founded it was a fraud and it was a ponzi scheme or I took a look at their prospectus and it is full of holes and their numbers have been falsified.

It's easy to summarize your opinion about the evidence you have looked at and judged.

I'm not going to chase you. Either you'll give an answer or not. You seem to think I'm trying to get some inside info or something. If one of the wise elderly cats in the hood ask you where you stand you want to yell at them to state your case and this is not how it goes.

If you answer cool if not cool either way I'm done and will let you be.

It's not up to him to present evidence. The person making a claim (there is a god) has the burden of proof. Just like a prosecutor making a claim that a defendant is guilty has to provide evidence that the defendant is guilty. It is not up to the defendant to provide evidence that he is not guilty.

 

[Thsnnor]

It's not up to him to present evidence. The person making a claim (there is a god) has the burden of proof. Just like a prosecutor making a claim that a defendant is guilty has to provide evidence that the defendant is guilty. It is not up to the defendant to provide evidence that he is not guilty.

The prosecutor has to look at the evidence and deem it good enough to even get in front of the judge, not the defendant. Christianity is on the defensive not Napoleon's evidence. All I wanted to know is what evidence he looked at specifically to say Meh, not good enough for me.

He has no problem trying to dump on anything religious across multiple threads. But trying to find out why and based upon what caused him to get to that point is the issue.

We can both go to the spot get the #2 and you may say it was the bomb and I could say not worth the money but when asked why both of us could say we had the #2.

 

[iBrowse]

Idk about yall but this
@Napoleon vs. @Thsnnor got me

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

The prosecutor has to look at the evidence and deem it good enough to even get in front of the judge, not the defendant.

You're making claims you can't back up.

If you step to me on the street with a jesus brochure and you can't sell me on the idea, whose fault is that?

Christianity is on the defensive not Napoleon's evidence. All I wanted to know is what evidence he looked at specifically to say Meh, not good enough for me.

Its not just christianity. Ask yourself why you're not a muslim and thats basically why I'm not apart of ANY religion.

He has no problem trying to dump on anything religious across multiple threads. But trying to find out why and based upon what caused him to get to that point is the issue.

Science. Politics. Philosophy. etc.

The same general shyt i've been telling you.

We can both go to the spot get the #2 and you may say it was the bomb and I could say not worth the money but when asked why both of us could say we had the #2.

Are you sleepy????

 

[Thsnnor]

Idk about yall but this
@Napoleon vs. @Thsnnor got me

Good conversation is always good.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Good conversation is always good.

Yet you aren't satisfied to know that when people aren't buying YOUR bullshyt, its NOT THEIR fault.

 

[iBrowse]

Good conversation is always good.

Yet you aren't satisfied to know that when people aren't buying YOUR bullshyt, its NOT THEIR fault.

 

[Thsnnor]

You're making claims you can't back up.

If you step to me on the street with a jesus brochure and you can't sell me on the idea, whose fault is that?

Its not just christianity. Ask yourself why you're not a muslim and thats basically why I'm not apart of ANY religion.

Science. Politics. Philosophy. etc.

The same general shyt i've been telling you.



Are you sleepy????

Still ducking the question I see. I said I'm going to let you be and I mean it. I'm not going to put you on ignore or anything. Can't answer a question but have a 20 line reply to something I said to someone else........

 

[Thsnnor]

Yet you aren't satisfied to know that when people aren't buying YOUR bullshyt, its NOT THEIR fault.

Can you answer the question instead of replying to things I wrote to other people?

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Still ducking the question I see. I said I'm going to let you be and I mean it. I'm not going to put you on ignore or anything. Can't answer a question but have a 20 line reply to something I said to someone else........

I can't fukking answer a vague ass question like "why aren't you a christian in relation to evidence you can show?"

You slow fukk. I don't know!

It doesn't click with me because everything I EVER hear asserted DOES NOT hold any weight.

Thats like asking why I don't believe in the tooth fairy...well, @retar...I mean @Thsnnor, its because there is no evidence for me to do so.

I know too much shyt. Theres not one knock out reason why christianity (among all the other religions) don't hold any weight. Its on THEM to make the argument for their legitimacy, not to rely on plausibility or deniability.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Can you answer the question instead of replying to things I wrote to other people?

What evidence have you seriously looked at and said it was not enough for you to deny Christianity?

Again...

In my 20+ years of obtaining a formal education, in addition to countless books, movies, traveling experiences, lectures, and conversations, I have not come across any evidence validating any religious claims of ANY sort, or convincing arguments that would influence me to submit to believing any theological assertion.

PERIOD.


I can't give you a more succinct, and direct answer than that.



​

 

[Thsnnor]

I can't fukking answer a vague ass question like "why aren't you a christian in relation to evidence you can show?"

You slow fukk. I don't know!

It doesn't click with me because everything I EVER hear asserted DOES NOT hold any weight.

Thats like asking why I don't believe in the tooth fairy...well, @retar...I mean @Thsnnor, its because there is no evidence for me to do so.

I know too much shyt. Theres not one knock out reason why christianity (among all the other religions) don't hold any weight. Its on THEM to make the argument for their legitimacy, not to rely on plausibility or deniability.

Someone told me about a Tooth Fairy and what they were about but when I was a kid I seen my parents stick money under my brothers pillow on the night he lost his tooth. Ever since then I knew what happens with regard to the Tooth Fairy.

Actually I like your answer better. I don't believe in the Tooth Fairy because there is no evidence for me to do so.

 

[iBrowse]