Eddie Long out here with "dem boyz" again...:mjpls:

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Someone told me about a Tooth Fairy and what they were about but when I was a kid I seen my parents stick money under my brothers pillow on the night he lost his tooth. Ever since then I knew what happens with regard to the Tooth Fairy.

Actually I like your answer better. I don't believe in the Tooth Fairy because there is no evidence for me to do so.

OK...so apply that rationale to christianity...and...VOILA!

Even still, your rationale isn't complete.

Don't get it?

Pay attention

Because seeing evidence to a contrary conclusion doesn't disprove the original assertion...AND leads to a greater point:

YOU CANT PROVE A NEGATIVE. Its the problem of induction. Read some Hume or something.

Evidence and proof is all that matters. If you can prove an assertion, then you've backed it up to the degree you've asserted a particular claim.

You didn't disprove that the tooth fairy didn't exist...merely that your parents had placed money under your pillow.

The tooth fairy COULD possibly exist...however unlikely that claim seems according to the rules of induction.

I say this to say this:

You take christianity for a given, so its functionally difficult for you to step outside of that paradigm and assess its asserts independently of your emotional attachment to them.

For lack of better term, you're brainwashed...so when you met a THOROUGH dude like me who doesn't take your (for lack of better term) BULLshyt (cause thats what religion is in my honest opinion, aside from being a failed science ) you can't handle it and take it as an affront on your innate sense of self, RATHER than an attack on what you perceive to be merely a belief system that exists independently of you.

Humble yourself on these religious topics and you can learn a thing or two.

Not all of us are ignorant 14 year olds on our mother's computers.

 

[Thsnnor]

OK...so apply that rationale to christianity...and...VOILA!

Even still, your rationale isn't complete.

Don't get it?

Pay attention

Because seeing evidence to a contrary conclusion doesn't disprove the original assertion...AND leads to a greater point: YOU CANT PROVE A NEGATIVE. Its the problem of induction. Read some Hume or something.

Evidence and proof is all that matters. If you can prove an assertion, then you've backed it up to the degree you've asserted a particular claim.

You didn't disprove that the tooth fairy didn't exist...merely that your parents had placed money under your pillow.

The tooth fairy COULD possibly exist...however unlikely that claim seems according to the rules of induction. :shoo:

I say this to say this:

You take christianity for a given, so its functionally difficult for you to step outside of that paradigm and assess its asserts independently of your emotional attachment to them.

For lack of better term, you're brainwashed...so when you met a THOROUGH dude like me who doesn't take your (for lack of better term) BULLshyt (cause thats what religion is in my honest opinion, aside from being a failed science ) you can't handle it and take it as an affront on your innate sense of self, RATHER than an attack on what you perceive to be merely a belief system that exists independently of you.

Humble yourself on these religious topics and you can learn a thing or two.

Not all of us are ignorant 14 year olds on our mother's computers.

I can't apply that cause I am a Christian.....

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

I can't apply that cause I am a Christian.....

?????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Yes, you can if you want to understand why I am not a christian. Thats what the fukk you asked ME...remember?????

And yes, that same rationale is why you're not a muslim, hindu, shinto, or sun worshipper

 

[Thsnnor]

?????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Yes, you can if you want to understand why I am not a christian. Thats what the fukk you asked ME...remember?????

And yes, that same rationale is why you're not a muslim, hindu, shinto, or sun worshipper

I can't step in your shoes to look at something. I'm a Christian and you are not. I've seen something you did not. The evidence was enough for me it is not for you.

You say the same rationale but you denied the evidence. Don't you see the conflict?

 

[iBrowse]

Spoiler

@LA Fisher next year you need to do religion bating threads..I'm telling you now nikka mark my words

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

I can't step in your shoes to look at something. I'm a Christian and you are not. I've seen something you did not. The evidence was enough for me it is not for you.

OK. So prevent your evidence.

You say the same rationale but you denied the evidence. Don't you see the conflict?

OK. So show me where I was wrong.

 

[Thsnnor]

OK. So prevent your evidence.



OK. So show me where I was wrong.

Stop trying to put the question back on me. I'll take it as you just don't want to answer. It's cool. I'm going to let you be. I'm done and not going to reply to you.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Stop trying to put the question back on me. I'll take it as you just don't want to answer. It's cool. I'm going to let you be. I'm done and not going to reply to you.

What the fukk am I not answering?????

I simply have no evidence to believe you.

Assert your case already.

Goddamn dude.

 

[#1 pick]

You about 10 years too late for that bruh. Smart and forward thinking nikkas here is already trying to dip out. Atlanta saturated bruh, the glory days is over. Real shyt.

Completely done. The evil dwellers will always try to find a new scheme but it's hard to make money in Atlanta as a Black man at this point. Too many of us and we don't have an economy.

 

[FrederickDouglas]

Stop trying to put the question back on me. I'll take it as you just don't want to answer. It's cool. I'm going to let you be. I'm done and not going to reply to you.

Napoleon has answered you multiple times throughout this fukking thread, you stupid motherfukker.

You fail to grasp the simple concept of the burden of proof time and time again, which doesn't speak well at all for your intellectual capacity. That, in turn, reflects so poorly on your beliefs that a legitimate reason not to believe in Christianity could well be because YOU Do.


There are numerous lines of reasoning that can be used to expose most, if not all, religions as bullshyt. I don't believe in Christianity because the cooks (religious leaders) don't wash their hands (don't practice what they preach) and the food is spoiled (the message is hollow). I've worked for them and they cut costs (ignore serious flaws to keep peddling their bullshyt). The guy who founded it was a fraud (Jesus Christ told his followers the end of the world would come in their lifetime and that many of them would never die) and it was a ponzi scheme (Christianity is based on ancient writings, translated numerous times, often with agendas, by an organization that is responsible for the deaths of many innocents throughout the course of its bloody exploitative history). I took a look at their prospectus (their holy book, The Bible) and it is full of holes (it IS full of holes) and their numbers have been falsified (full of lies, myths, contradictions, socially reprehensible ideas, and pointless filler).

 

[Detroit Wave]

not trying to get into this but why dont christians realize that the burden of proof is on them since their "claim" is the bible?

 

[Thsnnor]

Napoleon has answered you multiple times throughout this fukking thread, you stupid motherfukker.

You fail to grasp the simple concept of the burden of proof time and time again, which doesn't speak well at all for your intellectual capacity. That, in turn, reflects so poorly on your beliefs that a legitimate reason not to believe in Christianity could well be because YOU Do.


There are numerous lines of reasoning that can be used to expose most, if not all, religions as bullshyt. I don't believe in Christianity because the cooks (religious leaders) don't wash their hands (don't practice what they preach) and the food is spoiled (the message is hollow). I've worked for them and they cut costs (ignore serious flaws to keep peddling their bullshyt). The guy who founded it was a fraud (Jesus Christ told his followers the end of the world would come in their lifetime and that many of them would never die) and it was a ponzi scheme (Christianity is based on ancient writings, translated numerous times, often with agendas, by an organization that is responsible for the deaths of many innocents throughout the course of its bloody exploitative history). I took a look at their prospectus (their holy book, The Bible) and it is full of holes (it IS full of holes) and their numbers have been falsified (full of lies, myths, contradictions, socially reprehensible ideas, and pointless filler).

And yet you answered the question that he could not. Your evidence is you say there are flaws, based on ancient writings which were translated numerous times, an organization responsible for the deaths of many innocents throughout history, full of lies, myths, contradictions, socially reprehensible ideas and pointless filler.

Thank you for your evidence as to why you are not a Christian. I'm not going to use what you said against you or start an argument.

This is not about burden of proof or making a case. This is purely about asking someone where they stand and getting an answer and I want to say thank you for your answer.

I will say one thing tho. The largest group killed in history were Christians by the Roman Catholic Church. Over 40 million over the course of time. More killed then by the hands of Stalin, Mao, Hitler and Pot.

 

[Thsnnor]

not trying to get into this but why dont christians realize that the burden of proof is on them since their "claim" is the bible?

If someone asks you what you believe you are going to say you need to prove what you believe in first? It is just a simple question with nothing behind it but too many people must have their **** defenses up or something.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

And yet you answered the question that he could not. Your evidence is you say there are flaws, based on ancient writings which were translated numerous times, an organization responsible for the deaths of many innocents throughout history, full of lies, myths, contradictions, socially reprehensible ideas and pointless filler.

If I mentioned any of this it wouldn't matter, because thats not why I don't believe in the tenets christianity asserts dummy.

Its because what Christianity asserts is not substantiated to a reliable degree.

Thank you for your evidence as to why you are not a Christian. I'm not going to use what you said against you or start an argument.

This is a poorly formed argument as its used against ANY religion.

Whats your evidence for not being a fukking (insert vague religion)?

See how ridiculous that phrasing is?

This is not about burden of proof or making a case. This is purely about asking someone where they stand and getting an answer and I want to say thank you for your answer.

It is about burden of proof.

I don't believe you, so when you say something, its not my responsibility to say why I don't believe you.

I will say one thing tho. The largest group killed in history were Christians by the Roman Catholic Church. Over 40 million over the course of time. More killed then by the hands of Stalin, Mao, Hitler and Pot.

We can play oppression olympics if you want to jackass.

1. Hitler was catholic
2. Stalin/Mao/ and Pot were statists and revered as deities themselves. You don't have to be a member of an abrahamic religion for it to be considered a religion.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

If someone asks you what you believe you are going to say you need to prove what you believe in first? It is just a simple question with nothing behind it but too many people must have their **** defenses up or something.

You didn't ask me what I believe.

You asked me to list why I don't believe you.

Thats a completely different question.