Don't forget about how he got rid of the guy with arguably the best "character" in the NFL for the sexual abuser![]()
fukk the nfl for screwing tebow over
Don't forget about how he got rid of the guy with arguably the best "character" in the NFL for the sexual abuser![]()
Kubiak was shanahans o-cordinator for like 5 yearsShanahan didn't really like him in DC but they called him for info? Well surprise surprise that he's trying to sandbag him
They really did if u think about it. Dude helped take a team to the playoffs (team was 2-14 previous year) and won a playoff game against a formidable opponent. BUT these other mediocre to below average white QBs have longevity in the NFL and still getting contracts and contract renewals but Tebow couldn't have longevity. Makes u think.fukk the nfl for screwing tebow over
Raiders will definitely be improved. KC though? I don't know.Yeah but they did lose a couple of defensive players. The important thing is to keep that D in tact as much as possible but still improve the O. With KC doing well and Raiders on come up...AFC West getting to be very competitive.
Will certainly help if Charles and Maclin can come back healthy but didn't they lose a few on defense through cuts/free agency/injury?Being black in AmericaA guy who forced his way to a team after threatening to pursue a baseball career if he were drafted by the colts, also employed a guy who sexually assaulted a woman, is complaining about character issues![]()


They really did if u think about it. Dude helped take a team to the playoffs (team was 2-14 previous year) and won a playoff game against a formidable opponent. BUT these other mediocre to below average white QBs have longevity in the NFL and still getting contracts and contract renewals but Tebow couldn't have longevity. Makes u think.
His passing mechanics have been suspect for a while.I could see how you might think Tebow was legit if you only watched the fourth quarters of that season. He could barely pass the football, though. Defense and special teams kept that team in a lot of games. Now, is he worth a flier for a team not needing a star QB and willing to redo its entire offensive scheme? Maybe.They really did if u think about it. Dude helped take a team to the playoffs (team was 2-14 previous year) and won a playoff game against a formidable opponent. BUT these other mediocre to below average white QBs have longevity in the NFL and still getting contracts and contract renewals but Tebow couldn't have longevity. Makes u think.
Depends on the team. Difference between him and other QBs, though, is the circus that follows Tebow.They really did if u think about it. Dude helped take a team to the playoffs (team was 2-14 previous year) and won a playoff game against a formidable opponent. BUT these other mediocre to below average white QBs have longevity in the NFL and still getting contracts and contract renewals but Tebow couldn't have longevity. Makes u think.
Not sure who the Chiefs lost on D but ur right about Charles and Maclin. The fact that they did so well last year during that 10 win stretch with Charles out on a season ending injury is a good sign. I could see them being a problem unless Reid start displaying his excellent time management skills in very important games againRaiders will definitely be improved. KC though? I don't know.Will certainly help if Charles and Maclin can come back healthy but didn't they lose a few on defense through cuts/free agency/injury?


.
But yet the Broncos brought in this man is their starting quarterback
![]()