EPA considers repealing, replacing programs that help prevent childhood lead exposure

[the cac mamba]

Government organizations are not businesses and can't be ran like them....primarily because they are not for profit organizations.

So what and how much money is the EPA wasting?

i mean, you kinda just answered your own question

 

[Hood Critic]

i mean, you kinda just answered your own question

Yet you didn't answer a single one...so you don't know what you're talking about and you're just rambling to be rambling. Got it.

 

[the cac mamba]

Yet you didn't answer a single one...so you don't know what you're talking about and you're just rambling to be rambling. Got it.

this is kinda like the religion dilemma the burden of proof is on you to prove why i should give a fukk about this

i might be wrong about this. but all i see is a bunch of motherfukkers reading headlines and throwing their arms up immediately because they see "EPA" in the title

ive provided several links about the EPA's massive failures in Flint. they're being sued in Flint. that's money wasted to me. now of course, im sure they do plenty of good things. but for you to sit around and tell me that a massive government bureaucracy is unable to trim any fat is fukkING BULLshyt

would i like to see this applied to the military, the biggest offender, first and foremost? YES, absolutely. but thats not the issue at hand

 

[acri1]

where's trump's explicit order to do that

these thugs in the EPA would let a child die of lead poisoning before they cut one job, raise, or wasteful program. we both know this is true. so show me trump's explicit direction to cut lead exposure studies, or just admit that this is how the EPA is deciding to trim the fat

The whole reason this is happening is because of Trump's directive and because of who he put in charge of the EPA.

Shyt is literally everybody's fault but the Trump admin for you.

 

[Hood Critic]

this is kinda like the religion dilemma the burden of proof is on you to prove why i should give a fukk about this

i might be wrong about this. but all i see is a bunch of motherfukkers reading headlines and throwing their arms up immediately because they see "EPA" in the title

ive provided several links about the EPA's massive failures in Flint. they're being sued in Flint. that's money wasted to me. now of course, im sure they do plenty of good things. but for you to sit around and tell me that a massive government bureaucracy is unable to trim any fat is fukkING BULLshyt

would i like to see this applied to the military, the biggest offender, first and foremost? YES, absolutely. but thats not the issue at hand

I simply asked you what the fat was to be trimmed and where it could be better used - that would indicate that the burden is on you to explain your position. You STILL haven't answered that question. Instead you replied to me with a typical troll tactic and now you're ranting about government efficiency.

Like most conservatives you're repeating tired talking points that you don't fully understand.

 

[the cac mamba]

The whole reason this is happening is because of Trump's directive and because of who he put in charge of the EPA.

Shyt is literally everybody's fault but the Trump admin for you.

fukk the trump administration

now can you address what i asked?

 

[the cac mamba]

I simply asked you what the fat was and where it could be better used - that would indicate that the burden is on you to explain your position. You've STILL haven't answered that question. Instead you replied to me with a typical troll tactic and now you're ranting about government efficiency.

Like most conservatives you're repeating tired talking points that you don't fully understand.

breh i dont have the EPA's fukking budget laid out in front of me

this bores me you win, if itll make you feel better :trumpj:

 

[newworldafro]

We need regulations. But need administrations that will enforce existing laws.

It gets tricky though like BHO having the acceptable radiation levels increased in drinking water a few days after Fukushima......

If it takes you awhile to process that statement, it's because it's just as crazy but as real as it sounds.

They increased the acceptable amount of radiation in drinking water after Fukushima with no explanation or study or anything.
Post Fukushima: US EPA approves vastly higher radiation limits in drinking water

I mean..........

......and no.....the MSM did not talk about and if they did it was probably one article, never to be discussed again. This is the media some of y'all claim is so wonderful, and looking out for your best interests....

 

[Pressure]

They increased the acceptable amount of radiation in drinking water after Fukushima with no explanation or study or anything.
Post Fukushima: US EPA approves vastly higher radiation limits in drinking water

I mean..........

"The PAG Manual is a planning guide for emergency responders, and does not change federal, state or local environmental standards. The PAG guidelines are only for use during a large-scale emergency, when radiation levels could be high enough to cause health effects unless public safety measures are taken."

Calm down breh.