Eric Bledsoe’s crazy November

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

It sure ain’t yours

Let's just take a look at how you've embarrassed yourself over the last few days (of which is your time on this site, in a nutshell):

- Brought up Draymond's box score #s over a small sample of regular season games, trying to address a point by using a straw man argument about his game that nobody argued, because he's never been a main-option scoring player, yet you can't seem to value nor understand anything besides scoring. All the while not understanding that the game doesn't exist inside the box score [points, rebounds, assists etc], and that there are infinite more actions in the game that aren't recorded in it.

Not to mention, you're not even watching him play but simply looking at his box score #s, and using blanket revisionism of what he's proven over the last five years to prove whatever state his game is now in. Even in your box-score watching state, you couldn't even get Draymond's #s right, even swearing to God that you had the #s right when you didn't.

You're a classic case of why we need to get rid of box score stats.

- When you got called out for pounding box score #s into the ground, you then accuse the person who caught you out doing this of being the one who's guilty of it. Ole I got caught with my hand in the cookie jar, so I'll blame the person who caught me ass nikka.

- You then go and make ANOTHER thread based on box score #s over a small sample size of regular season games to prop up a player [Bledsoe], while deflecting from posts that brought up his #s from the last postseason (not too dissimilar to how you shytted on Draymond's #s over a handful of regular season games, but ignored his box score #s from the last 4-5 postseasons). And to make matters worse, you still don't know how to contextualize those surface #s properly, hence your comment of "At 6 foot 1 those percentages are god tier for a guy that gets 95% of his points from inside" which isn't how it works.

You literally stan players based on how aesthetically pleasing you find their bodies. It's no wonder that you don't understand the game, at all.

 

[Paper Boi]

 

[Rigby.]

While still being the best defensive PG in the league

 

[Bledswole]

Truth

 

[KillbertArenas]

I would hate it if Bledsoe started on my favorite team.

Hes not trash but hes not good - he has a weird dynamic...

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

Let's just take a look at how you've embarrassed yourself over the last few days (of which is your time on this site, in a nutshell):

- Brought up Draymond's box score #s over a small sample of regular season games, trying to address a point by using a straw man argument about his game that nobody argued, because he's never been a main-option scoring player, yet you can't seem to value nor understand anything besides scoring. All the while not understanding that the game doesn't exist inside the box score [points, rebounds, assists etc], and that there are infinite more actions in the game that aren't recorded in it.

Not to mention, you're not even watching him play but simply looking at his box score #s, and using blanket revisionism of what he's proven over the last five years to prove whatever state his game is now in. Even in your box-score watching state, you couldn't even get Draymond's #s right, even swearing to God that you had the #s right when you didn't.

You're a classic case of why we need to get rid of box score stats.

- When you got called out for pounding box score #s into the ground, you then accuse the person who caught you out doing this of being the one who's guilty of it. Ole I got caught with my hand in the cookie jar, so I'll blame the person who caught me ass nikka.

- You then go and make ANOTHER thread based on box score #s over a small sample size of regular season games to prop up a player [Bledsoe], while deflecting from posts that brought up his #s from the last postseason (not too dissimilar to how you shytted on Draymond's #s over a handful of regular season games, but ignored his box score #s from the last 4-5 postseasons). And to make matters worse, you still don't know how to contextualize those surface #s properly, hence your comment of "At 6 foot 1 those percentages are god tier for a guy that gets 95% of his points from inside" which isn't how it works.

You literally stan players based on how aesthetically pleasing you find their bodies. It's no wonder that you don't understand the game, at all.

@A.R.

To add to this, you're now ducking Wall's and Beal's respective box score #s, after saying Wall's better and it's "not even close".

 

[NkrumahWasRight Is Wrong]

@A.R.

To add to this, you're now ducking Wall's and Beal's respective box score #s, after saying Wall's better and it's "not even close".

But BLEDSWOLE though

 

[Remote]

@Gil Scott-Heroin must be reading this thread confused, like "I thought yall hate stats, then come in here using the most basic stats"

 

[Devil Plisken…CMS]

Same Bledsoe that makes sure The Bucks remain a 3rd world nation in May?

 

[Bledswole]

@A.R.

To add to this, you're now ducking Wall's and Beal's respective box score #s, after saying Wall's better and it's "not even close".

You still drunk from last night I see

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

You still drunk from last night I see

I'm "drunk", yet you're still ducking the box score #s.......



You don't have a problem referencing Bledsoe's and Draymond's respective box score #s, but you suddenly have a problem when it comes to Beal's.

 

[Bledswole]

I'm "drunk", yet you're still ducking the box score #s.......



You don't have a problem referencing Bledsoe's and Draymond's respective box score #s, but you suddenly have a problem when it comes to Beal's.

When Beal numbers lead to Washington winning and making it to the playoffs then we can talk.

You know shyt John Wall was doing while being a way better defender dumb dumb

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

When Beal numbers lead to Washington winning and making it to the playoffs then we can talk.

You know shyt John Wall was doing while being a way better defender dumb dumb

Beal has better box score #s.

Explain how it's not even close.

 

[Bledswole]

He's still not better than Malcolm Brogdon.

Yea he is his defense is on a whole nother level than Brogdon and his ability to finish and penetrate.

Brogdon only has the shot over him.

Kidd benched Brogdon for Bledsoe when Bledsoe arrived in Milwaukee

Milwaukee let Brogdon walk for Bledsoe

Stop it

He's still not better than Malcolm Brogdon.

I don't care what Jason Kidd did. He's not their coach anymore.

They kept Bledsoe over Brogdon because they paid Bledsoe first. You stan Bledsoe so you're biased. No need to go back and forth on this.

Brogdon had a 50/40/90 season last year.

50 40 90 bytch brog-don is that nikka

How many 50/40/90 seasons does Bledsoe have? You asked what he did and I answered. Stop quoting me, you're biased.

Since it is so easy to do, how many other 4th options in the league are putting up 50/40/90 seasons?

They let him walk because they paid Bledsoe.

Still shouldn't have left Brogdan go.

Brogdon is averaging 20 a game with 5 boards and 8 assists with a bigger role with the Pacers. He may not hit 50/40/90 but he's still better than Bledsoe. Bledsoe's game won't age well while Brogdon's will.

Look what we have here,Bledsoe vs Brogdon tonight

Let’s see what happens

 

[VegetasHairline]

Look what we have here,Bledsoe vs Brogdon tonight

Let’s see what happens

I don't care what happens. Malcolm Brogdon is better than Eric Bledsoe. You will never convince me otherwise. Stop quoting me.