1) it's irrelevant if she became more high profile after thisIn my opinion she wasn't even on like Pam Oliver or Suzy Kolber level pre-tape. The tape came out and people then began to search for it/her. Wasn't nobody besides that stalker really thinking about her before that. She clearly made a come up off being the victim of that situation. I just think you flat out wrong that people were checking for her like that. She's not even that pretty. Most people know her from the tape being made or funny enough being the "victim" of Richard Sherman's famous interview. This shyt clearly put a rocket on her back.
She probably would tooI'll dance naked on a pole for 55mil![]()
there is nothing ironic about this you idiot.You know the ironic thing is if Playboy or SI offered her just $10M to get butt ass naked, she probably would do it.![]()
:dameowl: no homo can't come close to saving that onewhat type of homo shyt is this![]()
Just bad publicity if they didn't. Just a way to cover their ass and save clientele since it happened on their groundsBut 55 million, dude? 55 MILLION?
I don't see why the hotel should have to pay half of it either. How were they at fault?
They do but the insurance will sue that company before ever paying out the settlement claiming that acted on complete negligence and they might not even have a policy that high in general. 55mil with the28 mil. They might have to file.I'm sure the local Marriott has insurance for shyt like that. They should be ok, especially after appealing the verdict to either get it tossed out or the amount lowered for settlement.
The stalker owes 28 million. He's dead broke. He don't even have 25 dollars in his name. She's not seeing any of this money. Her best bet was the Marriott International and the judge threw out the case for that.
there is nothing ironic about this you idiot.
If she accepted that, she would be agreeing to it.
She never agreed to be filmed, in her hotel room, by a creep stalker. She never agreed for it to be uploaded to the internet. These are not the same thing.
But 55 million, dude? 55 MILLION?
I don't see why the hotel should have to pay half of it either. How were they at fault?