Ex-Muslims and atheists meet in secret due to threats of violence

GetInTheTruck

Member
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
15,661
Reputation
-751
Daps
27,706
Reppin
Queens
How would the state learn about the personal beliefs of an ex-Muslim? :jbhmm:

The same way they would learn about various crimes and infractions - accusations/reports from others.

How many cases of apostates being executed do we find in Islamic history? :jbhmm:

Is this a serious question? The Ridda wars are probably the most famous example. On top of that there are so many narrations from Bukhari advocating death for Apostates. I could post them, but in the last thread about this you guys were trying to wiggle out of this dilemma by conveniently pushing aside the relevancy of hadeeth.

Why were there entire philosophical schools of thought in the heart of the Muslim world (places like Baghdad and Damascus) that were openly regarded as apostates by the Sunni State? I'm talking about the Jahmiyya, the Qadariyyah, Mulhideen (they were open atheists by the way), not to mention the extremist Shi'ite sects (Isma'iliyya, Alawiyyah etc). :jbhmm:

This is not a good argument for you, since many of the adherents of these sects were forced to flee the vicinity of orthodox Muslims for fear of their lives and safety. Ahmadis and Bahai's are not in India today because they decided to take a permanent vacation just for kicks. Besides what is the difference, really, since by conceding sectarian strife short of apostasy you are conceding the crux of the issue - that Islam is at heart an intolerant ideology.

Why were they debated by the jurists of the time (Abu Hanifah, the founder of the Hanafi Madhab, which is probably the largest school of thought in the muslim World today, was known for debating atheists) instead of just being executed for leaving the religion?

None of the the principle jurists reject apostasy, they all accept it. They just differ on how it is to be applied.

The way that this entire issue is framed is just ridiculous. Even if we agree that apostates are to be executed, it is not the job of vigilantes. Vigilantism is strictly forbidden, in fact.

Oh, well that just makes it ok then :heh:

Secondly, there is no actual Sharia compliant Government anywhere on Earth today, so this talk about Islamic law and Islamic legal principles is largely a red herring. What we have in the so called Islamic world today are leftovers from colonial rule. It's either secular dictatorships, with secular constitutions that use religion in a very opportunistic fashion to sedate the masses or kingdoms that were backed and installed by Western powers. In some parts you have complete chaos and breakdown of social structures, which has allowed various extremist groups to fill the gap. Presenting this sort of environment as representative of authentic "Islamic law" or "Islamic thought" is disingenuous to say the least.

No true scotsman fallacy. Logical Fallacies» ‘No True Scotsman’ Fallacy

Most Muslims don't even know the basics of the legal rules concerning ritual purification (fiqh al-taharah), let alone complex apostasy laws (which only the State would have a right to regulate, either way). Illiteracy is rampant. People have in many places reverted back to pre-Islamic cultural practices like honor killings, forced marriages etc.. In this type of environment, some ignorant people might respond with violence if they feel that their religion is being disrespected.

These ex-Muslims who publicize their apostasy tend to be opportunistic douchebags who are trying to ride the anti-Muslim wave. I know personally of several ex-Muslims whom nobody bothers. The worst that can happen in most cases is that the family cuts ties with them, which is their prerogative :manny:

They don't have to keep caring for adults :manny:

Bruh, you clearly know that death for apostasy is prescribed by your religion, that's why you are trying to be slick and weave qualifiers into your arguments. Nah fukk that.

The worst someone like you can do in a civilized country is call an ex-muslim a "douchebag" and kick them out of your family, but the worst you could do in a state governed by the principles of your religion would most likely be a lot of more sinister. Which is exactly why Islam should be kept in check wherever Muslims are a significant part of the population.
 

Brosef

I respect O.G. knowledge
Supporter
Joined
Jun 10, 2012
Messages
7,375
Reputation
2,710
Daps
36,589
Reppin
T-Dot
This meeting wasn't about forced conversion. It was about people being sliced up or even killed for leaving Islam.

What do you think about that?

According to Islamic law, within an Islamic state, if a citizen renounces Islam as their religion they are to be put to death. The "no compulsion in religion" quote Muslims love to quote comes from a time when Muslims were a minority living under Quraysh, don't fall for the trickery.

:kufifrancis: Non-Muslims out here as usual telling people what Islam preaches... And don't come back at me with some extremist shyt like from Saudi.

"Unfortunately, the punishment of apostasy has now become death, even though this menacing concept does not claim a single Quranic verse as evidence. In fact, although the subject of apostasy has been brought up several times in the Quran, no mention has ever been made of its punishment. In verse 3 chapter 145 God states “He who turns back on his heels shall not harm Allah a whit” – a clear indication that apostasy has no need for punishment. Similarly, Chapter 2 verse 109 states: “Whoever takes disbelief in exchange for belief has undoubtedly gone astray from the right path” – again no mention of a punishment. Nor is there evidence of such punishments in the life and practice of the Prophet Muhammad, the one to whom the Quran was revealed and who portrayed a perfect example of Islamic teachings. The Prophet never ordered anyone to be killed for apostasy; the few capital punishments that occurred during his time were a result of treason and colluding with the enemy in matters of the state.

The only punishment described in the Quran for denouncing Islam is that which rests with God Almighty: “Those who believe, then disbelieve, then again believe, then disbelieve and then increase in disbelief, Allah will never forgive them nor will He guide them to the right way. (4:138)”. Nothing else is needed."

Is it true that if a Muslim leaves or denounces his faith in Islam he will be killed? | Islam Ahmadiyya

Like I said earlier in here, no human is allowed to judge another one... that shyt is up to God.

I know plenty of ex Muslims and I don't see anyone bothering them. They mind their own business and live their life how they see fit.

That's because the religion says it doesn't matter if someone leaves. Just stay about your own business. But let the Islamophobes tell you otherwise
 

GetInTheTruck

Member
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
15,661
Reputation
-751
Daps
27,706
Reppin
Queens
:kufifrancis: Non-Muslims out here as usual telling people what Islam preaches... And don't come back at me with some extremist shyt like from Saudi.

"Unfortunately, the punishment of apostasy has now become death, even though this menacing concept does not claim a single Quranic verse as evidence. In fact, although the subject of apostasy has been brought up several times in the Quran, no mention has ever been made of its punishment. In verse 3 chapter 145 God states “He who turns back on his heels shall not harm Allah a whit” – a clear indication that apostasy has no need for punishment. Similarly, Chapter 2 verse 109 states: “Whoever takes disbelief in exchange for belief has undoubtedly gone astray from the right path” – again no mention of a punishment. Nor is there evidence of such punishments in the life and practice of the Prophet Muhammad, the one to whom the Quran was revealed and who portrayed a perfect example of Islamic teachings. The Prophet never ordered anyone to be killed for apostasy; the few capital punishments that occurred during his time were a result of treason and colluding with the enemy in matters of the state.

The only punishment described in the Quran for denouncing Islam is that which rests with God Almighty: “Those who believe, then disbelieve, then again believe, then disbelieve and then increase in disbelief, Allah will never forgive them nor will He guide them to the right way. (4:138)”. Nothing else is needed."

Is it true that if a Muslim leaves or denounces his faith in Islam he will be killed? | Islam Ahmadiyya

Like I said earlier in here, no human is allowed to judge another one... that shyt is up to God.

:laff: @ the irony of you posting something from an Ahmadiyya site.....you do know the Ahmadiyyas are considered kaffirs by Sunni Muslims right?

Qur'an 8:22-26

So remind them (O Muhammad ), you are only a one who reminds. You are not a dictator over them. Save the one who turns away and disbelieves. Then Allah will punish him with the greatest punishment. Verily, to Us will be their return; Then verily, for Us will be their reckoning.

:francis: Wow, look at that mercy!, look at that tolerance!

:stopitslime:
 

Brosef

I respect O.G. knowledge
Supporter
Joined
Jun 10, 2012
Messages
7,375
Reputation
2,710
Daps
36,589
Reppin
T-Dot
:laff: @ the irony of you posting something from an Ahmadiyya site.....you do know the Ahmadiyyas are considered kaffirs by Sunni Muslims right?

Qur'an 8:22-26

So remind them (O Muhammad ), you are only a one who reminds. You are not a dictator over them. Save the one who turns away and disbelieves. Then Allah will punish him with the greatest punishment. Verily, to Us will be their return; Then verily, for Us will be their reckoning.

:francis: Wow, look at that mercy!, look at that tolerance!

:stopitslime:

They have a peaceful interpretation so why hate on em?
 

God Almighty

Your Lord
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
2,185
Reputation
-245
Daps
9,611
I know plenty of ex Muslims and I don't see anyone bothering them.
IHEU deplores backlash and "hunt" against atheists in Malaysia

On Tuesday another Minister, Datuk Seri Shahidan Kassim, threatened a manhunt. “The (Federal Constitution) does not mention atheists. It goes against the Constitution and human rights… I suggest that we hunt them down vehemently and we ask for help to identify these groups,” he in a press conference at Parliament on the 8 August 2017.
 
Top