Exclusives are a GOOD thing and without it, gaming would be WORSE off.

Would you prefer a game not exist at all instead of it being exclusive?

  • Yes, I rather a game be exclusive and exist than to not exist at all.

  • No, I want games to be everywhere and to stifle creativity *hides Xbox logo on shirt*

  • :mjlol: Sony stans


Results are only viewable after voting.

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
71,870
Reputation
4,094
Daps
113,743
Reppin
Tha Land
Sony games are not everywhere on every device
They pretty much are through cloud stuff, and now xbox branding hardware that runs steam.

You can pretty much play your playstation games wherever you want.
I know on Xbox the line between it and PC is non existent
but Sony doesn't feel that way
They are slowly going that way. They are releasing more day 1 PC games than they are “timed exclusives” Only a matter of time before that turns into all games on PC day one.

"oh but not Nintendo"
Now you explain how Mario Kart being “exclusive” is beneficial to anyone but ninentdo?

Nintendo is the WOAT gaming company by far when it comes to consumer rights and benefits.

They get to profusely overcharge for their hardware and software. They get away with selling cheap unreliable hardware. They do fukk shyt like limited time releases.

And all that is cool cause you can only play mario on their little raggedy ass system.

And you dummy’s wanna argue that’s a GOOD thing. :stopitslime:
 

Fatboi1

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
61,546
Reputation
8,130
Daps
112,801
Exclusives are anti consumer when you just locking out a ecosystem, to make yours look more attractive.

What does this even mean?


Exclusives are not anti consumer when you create something you are publishing on your platform or with one platform in mind.


It's really not that hard
So how is this different from what every publisher of the main three have done so far?
 

Diondon

Thanks to the lawyers uh, I marbled the foyer
Joined
Mar 19, 2013
Messages
40,700
Reputation
9,292
Daps
180,777
Reppin
Somewhere tropic...
They pretty much are through cloud stuff, and now xbox branding hardware that runs steam.

You can pretty much play your playstation games wherever you want.

They are slowly going that way. They are releasing more day 1 PC games than they are “timed exclusives” Only a matter of time before that turns into all games on PC day one.


Now you explain how Mario Kart being “exclusive” is beneficial to anyone but ninentdo?

Nintendo is the WOAT gaming company by far when it comes to consumer rights and benefits.

They get to profusely overcharge for their hardware and software. They get away with selling cheap unreliable hardware. They do fukk shyt like limited time releases.

And all that is cool cause you can only play mario on their little raggedy ass system.

And you dummy’s wanna argue that’s a GOOD thing. :stopitslime:
Sounds like you gon have to buy a Switch if you want their games
Gee, what a radical idea
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
71,870
Reputation
4,094
Daps
113,743
Reppin
Tha Land
Sounds like you gon have to buy a Switch if you want their games
Gee, what a radical idea
This thread is arguing that as a “good thing” for consumers.

Just cause nintendo CAN bend people over for $600 Mario Kart doesn’t mean we should be applauding it.

@Fatboi1 made the OP and he ain’t even run out to buy that shyt.

If “exclusives” were so amazing all of you would have a switch 2 cause it’s the only console that will have them :usure:
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
71,870
Reputation
4,094
Daps
113,743
Reppin
Tha Land
BLOODBORNE
Stuck in a dusty ass situation on dusty ass hardware.

Now imagine if From wasn’t stuck waiting for sony to care about this game.

We’d have a better version on some other hardware.
Spider-Man
Has always had good games without needing to be exclusive.
I feel like people who are against exclusives are just liars who say that when it's not their favorite platform with the exclusives e.g. Xbox fans.
The cognitive dissonance in comments like this when this is the reality





Sony fukkin stans :smh:
 

Fatboi1

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
61,546
Reputation
8,130
Daps
112,801
Stuck in a dusty ass situation on dusty ass hardware.
But Bloodborne wouldn't have even been made in the first place.

Time is inevitable. Plenty of third party games that are stuck on dusty ass hardware as well e.g. Final Fantasy XII, Afro Samurai, Dante's Inferno.



Now imagine if From wasn’t stuck waiting for sony to care about this game.

We’d have a better version on some other hardware.

This isn't exclusive to FROM. Plenty of other games are stuck on Xbox. Why can't Microsoft do something with Jet Set Radio Future? Or wait imagine if From wasn't stuck waiting on Microsoft to care about this game:
250px-Otogi.png


Or waiting on Nintendo for this game:
Lost_Kingdoms_II_cover.jpg


Now those games are stuck on dusty ass hardware :smh:

Has always had good games without needing to be exclusive.
but Spider-Man 1, Miles and 2 are among the best games from that IP. Those older games were mostly ass.

The cognitive dissonance in comments like this when this is the reality





Sony fukkin stans :smh:
Cac articles.

Multi platform fukkin stans :smh:
 
Last edited:

Morose Polymath

GODHOOD
Poster of the Year
Joined
Aug 1, 2013
Messages
18,005
Reputation
14,810
Daps
73,845
Reppin
Above The Clouds
I sound goofy because there's usually some games that are the reason I buy a platform?

So nobody bought an Xbox because of Halo? No one bought a PS because of God of War? No one buys a Nintendo console to play Nintendo IPs?

Hey, the world is filled with an abundance of goofies. What can I say :yeshrug:
 

Waldo Geraldo Faldo

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
4,245
Reputation
1,080
Daps
14,911
Reppin
The Cloud
Exclusives are anti consumer when you just locking out a ecosystem, to make yours look more attractive.

Exclusives are not anti consumer when you create something you are publishing on your platform or with one platform in mind.


It's really not that hard
This sound like bullshyt, straight from the bull mouth
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
71,870
Reputation
4,094
Daps
113,743
Reppin
Tha Land
But Bloodborne wouldn't have even been made in the first place.
This is lies. From made that game. Just like they have made other souls spinoffs. Sony just paid to lock that shyt down to their console and leave it for dead :smh:
Time is inevitable. Plenty of third party games that are stuck on dusty ass hardware as well e.g. Final Fantasy XII, Afro Samurai, Dante's Inferno.
Not on xbox :blessed:
This isn't exclusive to FROM. Plenty of other games are stuck on Xbox. Why can't Microsoft do something with Jet Set Radio Future? Or
That’s a music licensing issue. Sega would have to find a way to fix that or remove the music which nobody would want.

but Spider-Man 1, Miles and 2 are among the best games from that IP. Those older games were mostly ass.
Naw some of them were great. And they didn’t need to be exclusive to do so.

Look at the Arkham games. GOAT super hero games. Not exclusive.


Cac articles.
The denial :wow:
 

Fatboi1

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
61,546
Reputation
8,130
Daps
112,801
This is lies. From made that game. Just like they have made other souls spinoffs. Sony just paid to lock that shyt down to their console and leave it for dead :smh:
The entire series started from Demon's Souls, which was a collaboration between FROM and Sony's Japan Studio.
They were pivotal in this series even existing. Had that not happened, we would've never got the games that are acclaimed today.


Not on xbox :blessed:

That’s a music licensing issue. Sega would have to find a way to fix that or remove the music which nobody would want.
:stopitslime: Otogi and Lost Kingdoms are because of music licensing too?

Naw some of them were great. And they didn’t need to be exclusive to do so.
and the exclusive ones are absolutely better. They're the best super hero games out among all the others. That Insomniac touch was fire. They almost were exclusive to Xbox at first.


Look at the Arkham games. GOAT super hero games. Not exclusive.
Look at Sunset Overdrive, exclusive and a great game right?
91GNVYYwTQL._AC_UF1000,1000_QL80_.jpg

The denial :wow:
:wow:
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
71,870
Reputation
4,094
Daps
113,743
Reppin
Tha Land
The entire series started from Demon's Souls, which was a collaboration between FROM and Sony's Japan Studio.
They were pivotal in this series even existing. Had that not happened, we would've never got the games that are acclaimed today.
No. Sony was bout to scrap that shyt. They didn’t believe in it at all. Miyazaki stepped in and fixed it. It was viewed as a spiritual successor to forms own game Kings field.
:stopitslime: Otogi and Lost Kingdoms are because of music licensing too?
You can play those on xbox right now :ahh:
and the exclusive ones are absolutely better. They're the best super hero games out among all the others. That Insomniac touch was fire. They almost were exclusive to Xbox at first.
Naw and Naw
Look at Sunset Overdrive, exclusive and a great game right?
91GNVYYwTQL._AC_UF1000,1000_QL80_.jpg


:wow:
Currently can be played on a plethora of hardware.

Microsoft allowed insomniac to keep the IP.

Only reason the franchise is dead is because sony effectively killed it by turning insomniac into their Marvel game studio.

In this instance, “exclusives” and the need for sony to use them to sell hardware has stifled one of the industries most creative studios.

But that’s a good thing right??? :usure:
 

daze23

Siempre Fresco
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
32,358
Reputation
2,725
Daps
44,841
I sound goofy because there's usually some games that are the reason I buy a platform?

So nobody bought an Xbox because of Halo? No one bought a PS because of God of War? No one buys a Nintendo console to play Nintendo IPs?
someone here copped Stadia to play BG3, and an Xbox to play Starfield. is that good for consumers?
 

Fatboi1

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
61,546
Reputation
8,130
Daps
112,801
someone here copped Stadia to play BG3, and an Xbox to play Starfield. is that good for consumers?
BG3 is on PS5, PC and Series X. How is this relevant?

Starfield was something exclusive to Xbox, they wanted it they bought it.

I know someone that copped an Xbox to play Halo Infinite. Is that good for consumers?

I know someone that spent $1000 to buy a PC to play COD Warzone, is that good for consumers?
 
Top