Explain to me why MJ is better then Wilt Chamberlin

Brown Ant

Hunter-Gatherer
Joined
Jul 31, 2012
Messages
2,229
Reputation
-215
Daps
1,586
Reppin
a colony near you
Wilt played in a weak era, MJ played in the prime era. The teams around now a days are trash, it's why I can't respect anyone saying LeBron is better than MJ.
 

KEEPITTRILLA

soon as i catch the vibe tell em 2 fetch th hearse
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
8,798
Reputation
507
Daps
12,468
Reppin
TX
Because Wilt was worse :aicmon:
 

Optimus Prime

#AGGIEPRIDE
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
20,717
Reputation
5,530
Daps
102,693
Reppin
NC A&T SU, Hornets, Panthers, North Carolina
MJ maximized his talent/skills and was ruthless and IMHO, Wilt didn't. Wilt was a freak of nature and his overall numbers are great but no way he should have just 2 championships. Wilt was 7'1'' averaging 50/25 and still let 6'10'' Bill Russell get the better of him most of the time. I believe if Wilt had MJ's drive/determination, Wilt would have won 10 championships at-least. I don't believe Wilt was ever considered the "leader" of those 2 championship teams he was on. West was the leader on that '71 Laker team and Billy Cunningham/Hal Greer were the leaders of that '67 Sixer team and we all know MJ was the undisputed leader of the Bulls...
 

CantStop

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
48,126
Reputation
9,490
Daps
216,220
Lol at complaining about the 60's when the 90's was a flabby n sick era. No surprise a certain someone could only win his rings in that decade.
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
352
Reputation
50
Daps
367
I forgot which writer was saying that the regular average person cant relate to the big guys the way they can relate to 6'6 guys who are the average size in the NBA so they discount the accomplishments of guys like Wilt and Kareem.

Its unfair, you cant take thier size advantage away from them and say Jordan is pound for pound the greatest or some bull like that
 
Top