AnonymityX1000
Veteran
They actually aren't.You're American aren't you?
Facebook turned on feature that confirmed many pro-Trump pages are run from outside the US
- Thread starter tru_m.a.c
- Start date
Berniewood Hogan
IT'S BERNIE SANDERS WITH A STEEL CHAIR!
i don't know, let's do a cursory google search for "alex jones black people" and see what comes upIf A. Jones talks about organic food over GMO is that right-wing?
If he talks about not wanting Don Cheeto to attack Syria is that rightwing racist?
If he talks about not wanting BHO and HillRod to attack Libya is that rightwing racist?
If he talks about chemicals in water is that racist?
If he talks about the Social Credit Score System in China, called Sesame Credit, being an example of what is being prepped in the U.S. is that right wing racist?
If talks about protecting the Bill of Rights is that racist?
https://www.mediamatters.org/video/...ist-black-people-who-hate-black-people/220027
https://knowledgefight.com/racism/
https://www.thewrap.com/alex-jones-go-to-africa/
http://www.newsweek.com/alex-jones-...ople-infowars-whites-travel-advisories-653468
LeVraiPapi
Redemption is Coming
If A. Jones talks about organic food over GMO is that right-wing?
If he talks about not wanting Don Cheeto to attack Syria is that rightwing racist?
If he talks about not wanting BHO and HillRod to attack Libya is that rightwing racist?
If he talks about chemicals in water is that racist?
If he talks about the Social Credit Score System in China, called Sesame Credit, being an example of what is being prepped in the U.S. is that right wing racist?
If talks about protecting the Bill of Rights is that racist?
you want me to show you where he's outright disrespecting Black leaders? With that thinking, if slave owners talked about their love for female slaves, are they bad? You are way smarter than this.
AndroidHero
Superstar
newworldafro
DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
I'm pretty sure he has popped shiit at leaders of all races, and praised leaders of all races.
moot point
newworldafro
DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Why the fukk are you listening to Alex Jones and Infowars?
I pretty much just mentioned a list of things he discusses, that's your answer. Scroll up.
Now if you can direct me to an individual...man, woman, black, white, Asian, Latino, mixed, Conservative, liberal, independent, Christian, Muslim, Jewish, Hindu, Buddhist, Atheist, etc.....that talks about those topics in one show, please direct me to their website, YouTube channel, social media, because I want to hear their perspective and guests' perspective on those topics and more.
AndroidHero
Superstar
Since you listen to Alex Jones and Infowars and you clearly take them seriously as a legitimate source of news, what do you think about this story?
"America’s most prominent law enforcement agency is apparently relying upon a conspiracy theory website to cull evidence used in the prosecution of an alleged ‘Black Identity Extremist.’
A Friday report in The Guardian noted that the Federal Bureau of Investigation recently tried and failed to prosecute Rakem Balogun on charges of illegally possessing a firearm and threatening law enforcement. Balogun sat in prison for five months and said he had his life destroyed by the federal government partly on the basis of a video segment that originally aired on Alex Jones‘ Infowars website.
According to Special Agent Aaron Keighley, investigators began surveillance on Balogun after Infowarsposted a video of his participation in a March 2015 rally against police brutality and racism in Austin, Texas. This admission from Keighley was made in open court.
Balogun noted the distressing nature of the FBI’s newest reliable source. The 34-year-old father of three said:
"They’re using a conspiracy theorist video as a reason to justify their tyranny? That is a big insult."
The special agent was unable, however, to mention any of Balogun’s own actions at that rally which might have prompted the government’s surveillance. Instead, it was Balogun’s mere presence there–all those years ago–which led to a government campaign of monitoring, harassment and detention"
http://www.thecoli.com/threads/the-...ormation-to-prosecute-black-activists.631370/
Because of a video posted by infowars a black man was in prison for 5 months and he lost his house, job and his life was ruined.
There was 2 threads made about this in TLR and I made a thread about this in HL, yet you said nothing about this story, but you love coming into other threads and defend infowars at every chance.
newworldafro
DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Since you listen to Alex Jones and Infowars and you clearly take them seriously as a legitimate source of news, what do you think about this story?
"America’s most prominent law enforcement agency is apparently relying upon a conspiracy theory website to cull evidence used in the prosecution of an alleged ‘Black Identity Extremist.’
A Friday report in The Guardian noted that the Federal Bureau of Investigation recently tried and failed to prosecute Rakem Balogun on charges of illegally possessing a firearm and threatening law enforcement. Balogun sat in prison for five months and said he had his life destroyed by the federal government partly on the basis of a video segment that originally aired on Alex Jones‘ Infowars website.
According to Special Agent Aaron Keighley, investigators began surveillance on Balogun after Infowarsposted a video of his participation in a March 2015 rally against police brutality and racism in Austin, Texas. This admission from Keighley was made in open court.
Balogun noted the distressing nature of the FBI’s newest reliable source. The 34-year-old father of three said:
"They’re using a conspiracy theorist video as a reason to justify their tyranny? That is a big insult."
The special agent was unable, however, to mention any of Balogun’s own actions at that rally which might have prompted the government’s surveillance. Instead, it was Balogun’s mere presence there–all those years ago–which led to a government campaign of monitoring, harassment and detention"
The FBI is Now Apparently Relying on InfoWars For Information to Prosecute Black Activists
Because of a video posted by infowars a black man was in prison for 5 months and he lost his house, job and his life was ruined.
There was 2 threads made about this in TLR and I made a thread about this in HL, yet you said nothing about this story, but you love coming into other threads and defend infowars at every chance.
I have disagreed with A. Jones in plenty of issues. Why would I defend a black man being locked up over made up BIE bullshiit. I do think that this an area that Don Cheeto's people took and ran off the deep end based off of something A. Jones discussed.
I don't agree he should have been locked up. It's a bullshiit charge. That simple.
I remember that show as well when their group were marching in Austin, and he talked about how he believed they were inflaming emotions to attack police officers because they were saying "oink oink, bang bang" when they were marching down the street.
The rhetoric is strong, but there is no reason that particular guy should have been locked up.
Go to @4:00 ..."oink oink, bang bang".
That was the part he talked about as being language he disagreed with and reckless.
A. Jones never said lock anybody up over this. He stated his opinion about the rhetoric. He has talked multiple times about black gun ownership.....he supports the 2nd Amendment for
everybody.... I listen to the show and he says it all the time.
Michael Cargill is an African American in Austin gun rights supporter and instructor that he suports.
Last edited:
AndroidHero
Superstar
Here is Infowars attacking Rakem Balogun you know the black man that was arrested and his life ruined because of infowars video, calling him all sort of names including 'far-left militant' comparing his group to ISIS and praising 'honest' FBI agents for once not going after Trump but going after and arresting this black man and other black 'militants' who are according to infowars a dangerous threat.
Yeah but keep defending infowars and claim they support black gun ownership
Edit: And just so you know infowars editor at large Paul Joseph Watson is a white supremacist who said in the past that African and Middle Eastern people are more aggressive because they have lower IQs, and yet we have someone who claims to be black in a black forum still defending infowars.
Last edited:
newworldafro
DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Here is Infowars attacking Rakem Balogun you know the black man that was arrested and his life ruined because of infowars video, calling him all sort of names including 'far-left militant' comparing his group to ISIS and praising 'honest' FBI agents for once not going after Trump but going after and arresting this black man and other black 'militants' who are according to infowars a dangerous threat.
Yeah but keep defending infowars and claim they support black gun ownership
Edit: And just so you know infowars editor at large Paul Joseph Watson is a white supremacist who said in the past that African and Middle Eastern people are more aggressive because they have lower IQs, and yet we have someone who claims to be black in a black forum still defending infowars.
Is that A. Jones or is that one of dozens of people that go on his shows to offer their opinions?
Do I need to show videos of A. Jones talking with Larry Pinckney, original member of the original Black Panthers, and they're in total agreement.
Interviews with Pinckney go back 10 years.
I feel like this thread is going off topic. So I'll just say.......AS I ALWAYS SAY, I don't agree with anyone 100% of the time, so like a buffet a la carte, I'll take the good stuff I can agree with and leave the bullshiit. That's how I look at politicians, pundits, websites, and news media.
Yes. And, yes, far...far too many do.
AnonymityX1000
Veteran
Based on what tho? I mean it sounds nice but is there any evidence to back up your claim?
The last time I go into it with you your entire premise centered on denying that political philosophies have coherent definitions because those definitions didn't fit your narrative.
You can easily look up the average time spent by Americans on social media platforms and compare that against the average time spent reading, and draw your own conclusions. Or you can look at the amount of money and energy spent on social media electioneering, and decide for yourself why they might be doing that.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=2016+social+media+campaign+funding
Or, you can deny all of that because it doesn't fit your 2016 election narrative.
