That's not a scientist or a "scientific analysis", that's a report from a "forensic examiner". In other words, some random computer geek with a bachelor's in programming who got a cert because he knows how to clean up images.
You been trying to accuse me of not listening to scientists when you've based your whole thing on a "forensic examiner" who's taken less bio than I have!
The biology in there is mostly bullshyt, and you can tell right away that he's likely never taken an anatomy or evolutionary course in his life. He makes elementary errors like claiming a set of photos "illustrates the evolutionary changes from the gibbon to the human" when humans never evolved from a gibbon, they evolved from a common ancestor to both gibbons and humans. The "science" he uses is almost certainly a mix of things he copied out of books or things other Bigfoot experts fed him.
And ridiculous claims, like he can see the quadriceps muscle flexing or he can see the kneecap moving, at that distance with the film quality and under all that fukking hair?
Like we sit on a planet. That planet sits in the Milky Way. Our galaxy sits in the universe. But what's outside of the universe? The universe can't just be chilling in nothingness. It has to be inside of something. And there has to be an out somewhere that leads to somewhere else. Our galaxy is like a single speck of dust in a 50,000 sq ft warehouse (the entire universe). But there has to be a way out the warehouse though? 
