Fast food workers strike, demanding $15 an hour

Kalik

Rasta in Babylon
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
7,751
Reputation
1,215
Daps
13,831
Reppin
Florida / Bahamas
nikka on a 3rd grade, you fatty arguement....
Thats what lack of p*ssy does when you in over in Afghan sand making big money but them chicks you leave behind getting bussed down by regular joes like me, then you come home and trick...

While you online tryna make your life feel important.. analyzing other men
 

TLR Is Mental Poison

The Coli Is Not For You
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
46,172
Reputation
7,500
Daps
105,733
Reppin
The Opposite Of Elliott Wilson's Mohawk
Well your "wager" was totally incorrect :dead:

How are McDonalds workers today any more skilled or valuable than they were 20, 30, 50 years ago?

Do you fellate the rich and powerful in real life or is this just an online persona that you try your best to keep up? Trying to connect the McDonalds worker to the overall increase in productivity and its relationship to wage stagnation is a nice trick friend, but it will not fly as a factual representation of the labour market. If the relationship between investment and productivity was so linear, then why was the last oil refinery in America built in the 1970's, despite Oil being one of the most heavily invested in industries?

We are not talking abotu the labor market at large though, we are talking about McDonalds. What the fukk do oil refineries have to do with McDonalds workers demanding a doubling in pay for nothing? You are all over the place

Before you take a condescending tone with others, I suggest you thoroughly understand the relationships between labour, prices and investment, and see that it is anything but linear. Maybe if your vocabulary included words such as "Labour Intensive" or "Capital Intensive" you would get a grasp as to why different industries have different outcomes with regards to productivity levels historically and wages. Maybe.

You live on paper and in economic theory. I dont have to be Milton Friedman to understand that certain labor is more valuable than others, and jobs that require no skills will always be at the bottom of the totem pole. I dont have to be John Kenyes to understand that labor is like any commodity, and is best priced w/o any distortions or perversions. Nobody is putting a gun to these people's heads and making them work minimum wage jobs, or making them make poor decisions that prevent them from investing in themselves. Is shyt perfect? No, but just like you can't solve the income gap through taxation, you can't solve the income gap through labor price fixing. @BarNone loves to bring up that one example in Las Vegas as though it applies to any and every labor market... shyt is ridiculous.

Here is what I think needs to happen to help these people. fukk incentivizing working at a low end job, these jobs have never been long term high level good paying employment. If I could wave a magic wand, I would

- cap tuitions + make public colleges/universities free (we are subsidizing it heavily as is and will subsidize it more w/Obama's student loan plans)
- create public works programs to help rebuild the country's infrastructure
- require some level of financial education in high school
- incentivize STEM and work to generate more American born candidates
- strike some kind of real estate compromise to help retain and stop the displacement of the middle class in inner city NYC

Etc

Working at McDonalds SHOULD be shytty, its literally the bottom of the barrel. McDonalds workers and the country at large should be looking at how to help McDonalds workers get to the next step.... not incentivizing staying at the low level they are at. People need to stop looking at the paychecks and start looking at the bigger problems.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Kalik

Rasta in Babylon
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
7,751
Reputation
1,215
Daps
13,831
Reppin
Florida / Bahamas
Same shyt I said a couple pages ago. Lower class got govt assistance and mandatory wage increases. Rich got tax breaks. Middle class stay getting bent over. And these are the people doing the right thing. Going to work, paying taxes, and NOT living off the system.

Truth, but no one sees that
 

Sonic Boom of the South

Louisiana, Army 2 War Vet, Jackson State Univ Alum
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
84,251
Reputation
25,250
Daps
305,554
Reppin
Rosenbreg's, Rosenberg's...1825, Tulane
nikka on a 3rd grade, you fatty arguement....
Thats what lack of p*ssy does when you in over in Afghan sand making big money but them chicks you leave behind getting bussed down by regular joes like me, then you come home and trick...

While you online tryna make your life feel important.. analyzing other men

:heh: im not married big pun

i dont own no broad

i dont give a fukk what a hoe do

and u the one trying to judge people when you have "much" to be judged by:heh:


and u got kids too?:heh:

u might want to wait till they are grown and you know for a fact are successful before you talk shyt about someone's career:heh:


fat ass
hot pocket molesting ass nikka:umad:
 

Kalik

Rasta in Babylon
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
7,751
Reputation
1,215
Daps
13,831
Reppin
Florida / Bahamas
8oUCb.gif
 

Kalik

Rasta in Babylon
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
7,751
Reputation
1,215
Daps
13,831
Reppin
Florida / Bahamas
8oUCb.gif

Nah thats how Im feeling comfortable and content with my life.... Got my career, family, good life.

meanwhile you over there skyping chicks so you can jack off .... get the fukk outta here, reminiscing on fukkin dubai hookers

http://www.the-coli.com/2301670-post77.html



yess indeed

i havent had puss since the end of July/ begin of Aug when I was in Dubai on leave

when im not on missions i do have alot of Skype sex with ole gurl :merchant:
 

Sonic Boom of the South

Louisiana, Army 2 War Vet, Jackson State Univ Alum
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
84,251
Reputation
25,250
Daps
305,554
Reppin
Rosenbreg's, Rosenberg's...1825, Tulane
Nah thats how Im feeling comfortable and content with my life.... Got my career, family, good life.

meanwhile you over there skyping chicks so you can jack off .... get the fukk outta here, reminiscing on fukkin dubai hookers

http://www.the-coli.com/2301670-post77.html

i just had some skype sex bout 1hr ago too:ohlawd:

i will be back in America in less than 2months for good tho :boss:

perhaps i will come to Fla and toss a few schillings your way fatty
 

Broke Wave

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
18,704
Reputation
4,580
Daps
44,606
Reppin
Open Society Foundation
@She Agree That I'm Looney

How are McDonalds workers today any more skilled or valuable than they were 20, 30, 50 years ago?
They're not... but how can a business do the same thing for 50 years straight without any kind of innovation, and continualy expand? It's because it''s being subsidized by low wages.


We are not talking abotu the labor market at large though, we are talking about McDonalds. What the fukk do oil refineries have to do with McDonalds workers demanding a doubling in pay for nothing? You are all over the place

Oversimplification, I was trying to explain the relationship between the profitability of an investment from a capital stand point and innovation, which you tried to link to productivity. Really YOU were all over the place.

Nobody is putting a gun to these people's heads and making them work minimum wage jobs, or making them make poor decisions that prevent them from investing in themselves. Is shyt perfect?

Now you're doing the trick where you try to argue for capitalism instead of your indefensible position. Never did I say anyone is forced to work but that doesn't mean anything. Nobody was forced to work in Industrial Revolution England. Nobody is forced to go to school, is your conclusion that only things that involve compulsion should be subject to amicable conditions?


Here is what I think needs to happen to help these people. fukk incentivizing working at a low end job, these jobs have never been long term high level good paying employment. If I could wave a magic wand, I would

- cap tuitions + make public colleges/universities free (we are subsidizing it heavily as is and will subsidize it more w/Obama's student loan plans)
- create public works programs to help rebuild the country's infrastructure
- require some level of financial education in high school
- incentivize STEM and work to generate more American born candidates
- strike some kind of real estate compromise to help retain and stop the displacement of the middle class in inner city NYC
Whatever @ these... I'm not disagreeing with any of these points but it's totally off topic. I have my own ideas but this is not antithetical to what I'm saying, we're looking at the labour market not poverty alleviation.


Working at McDonalds SHOULD be shytty, its literally the bottom of the barrel. McDonalds workers and the country at large should be looking at how to help McDonalds workers get to the next step.... not incentivizing staying at the low level they are at. People need to stop looking at the paychecks and start looking at the bigger problems.
First of all, no job should be "shytty". That statement is absolutely typical of your condescending mind-state. All jobs are operated by human beings and as such should be afforded some kind of dignity, safety, and general consideration provided by the employers. You're living in a dream world where there is a "next step"... some people need to work to feed their families NOW. They need to work TODAY, so we need to start thinking about their paycheques right now. The fact is that the minimum wage adjusted for inflation has actually gone DOWN in America, and clearly that hasn't helped anything. These companies are allowed to expand and suck profit out of otherwise unprofitable ventures by paying extremely low wages that distort the labour market, with the employees having to STILL take government assistance. A society should not be subsidizing such extremely low wages if it wants to see economic growth. 15 dollars an hour is hyperbole but you need two forces... one pushing for 15 and the other pushing for 0.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Bolzmark

Superstar
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
8,884
Reputation
1,525
Daps
29,312
Reppin
Brooklyn
Step one in analyzing a situation: do not use anecdotal evidence to try to prove your point when there are wide-ranging statistics that prove otherwise. The fact that you all are harping on this minimum wage argument is foolish for multiple reasons:

(1) On average, your wage is not determined by what you can convince your employer to pay you, to assume that is to assume that the worker has some semblance of bargaining power, they do not. That was the entire basis behind the labor relations act and minimum wage laws, just because it's possible in some isolated circumstances does not mean it is widespread overall. In fact, people who make 6 figures salaries are often stuck within a lockstep salary structure themselves. But even more so, the idea that "unskilled" people are the only ones working at Starbucks, waitressing, etc. is a joke. I thought I dispelled that yesterday, I have no idea why we're still talking about.

Whats your point here? Yes there are peple with all kinds of work backgrounds working at these fast food places. Their wages are determined by WHAT THE EMPLOYER WANTS TO PAY THEM, in line with federal and state labor laws. My point was that thesecorporation are goingt pay the least amount they can in regards to the law. As long as their are indivisuals willing to take those wages, they will not raise them.

(2) the minimum wage has not risen according to inflation, so basically you are all tacitly supporting a status quo that takes advantages of the law to depress individuals.

No the minimum wage has not risen according to inflation. Now as far as the supportingthe status quo part, I dont kno what you mean. If you read my post, you will not see a mesay I support the way it is, I'm simply saying THIS IS THE WAY IT IS.

(3) You take the elitist tone that someone working at Wal-Mart is lesser than you and thus they should not have the opportunity to support a family whatsoever because they are working a job that many others are capable of working, meanwhile you ignore that the entire middle class was built up in the manufacturing sector with people doing jobs we could all be trained to do.

I dont know bout elitist, but someone working at Walmart probably has lesser "earning potential" than a lawyer, doctor, CEO, or many other jobs in our society, wouldnt you agree? Yes everyone hs the same opportunities, but when you make the decision to work at Walmart, yu have consciously placed yourself in a position where your ability to support a family is limited. Walmart did not force you to come work for them. Their job is not to support your family. Their job is to make as much money as legally possible. Im sure in the job ad it doesnt say we will pay you enough to support your family. You're right, the middle class was built up in the manufacturing sector. In 2013 though, you will NOT bea bale to jin the middle class by being cashier or stock boy at Walmart. That may have bee the case decades ago, BUT THOSE DAYS ARE OVER. If Walmart could pay even less they would! Again, I'm not saying I support tis, BUT IT IS WHAT IT IS.

(4) You have this magical belief in the market somehow distributing fairness and paying people what they're worth. Well let's look at China's market or anywhere else we export work too. The baseline for what one can be paid in this country rose due to the minimum wage laws and labor unions. Left to their own devices, employers will pay players nothing.

Yeah you're right.

(5) The idea that someone working at a fast food place does not deserve to be paid a higher wage and that it will cripple the industry is ridiculous. In Las Vegas, as of 2004, hotel housekeepers generally earned $11.95 an hour. That is equivalent to making 46,010 a year in New York City or over 22 dollars per hour. It is because the workers were unionized, and the business was doing so well they decided to be magnamimous. A company like McDonalds could easily afford to do the same thing and adjust wages according to where the person is located. So inactuality, 15 dollars per hour isn't asking for much in comparative terms, and obviously McDonalds would not have to pay that amount to workers in the South and other places. The idea that McDonald's prices would HAVE to go up, by a significant amount is not necessarily true. (I don't have the time to go look up what percentage of their expenses come from employee salaries).

If you did in fact carfully read my post, you will see I said the industry CAN afford to pay their workers more. Yes Mickey D's can likely afford to pay their workers $15/hr. They got CRAZY DOUGH. I called their corporate office and suggested this. They replied with a "FUKK YOU! You see, snce pying their workers more money would mean less money in the pockets of the CEO's and mebers on the Board of Directors, they are not interested.

My whole point is if you are one of these workers you need to re-evaluate your life. Yu need to get the schooling or training to be abl to acquire other jobs. McDonalds, KFC, and Taco Bell do not give sh!t about you taking care of your family or helping you enter the middle class. You can either accept their wages or move the fukk on. The fact of the matter is even some mentally challenged people can do these jobs. So while you are striking, asking for more money, the big big wigs at these corporations are looking at you like :childplease:
 

TLR Is Mental Poison

The Coli Is Not For You
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
46,172
Reputation
7,500
Daps
105,733
Reppin
The Opposite Of Elliott Wilson's Mohawk
@She Agree That I'm Looney


They're not... but how can a business do the same thing for 50 years straight without any kind of innovation, and continualy expand? It's because it''s being subsidized by low wages.
The fact that a McDonald's kitchen & register is completely different from one not even 20 years ago suggests otherwise. Where do you think the money for the re-investment into equipment and logistics should come from? McDonalds would not be what it is if it took the money it invested into paying the least experienced + unskilled labor pool the same wages as experienced and skilled laborers completely arbitrarily




Oversimplification, I was trying to explain the relationship between the profitability of an investment from a capital stand point and innovation, which you tried to link to productivity. Really YOU were all over the place.
Whatever


Now you're doing the trick where you try to argue for capitalism instead of your indefensible position. Never did I say anyone is forced to work but that doesn't mean anything. Nobody was forced to work in Industrial Revolution England. Nobody is forced to go to school, is your conclusion that only things that involve compulsion should be subject to amicable conditions?
You did this in previous posts and in this very post. I will address this contradiction below.


Whatever @ these... I'm not disagreeing with any of these points but it's totally off topic. I have my own ideas but this is not antithetical to what I'm saying, we're looking at the labour market not poverty alleviation.
In the case of the McDonalds employee the two go hand in hand. They are the working poor and are demanding a living wage. Academic compartmentalization doesn't work in the real world, where numerous issues combine to create an overarching problem. You can't talk about McDonald's workers wages in NYC without talking about the forces and factors that make their already unlivable wage that much more so in NYC, or the objective value of their labor, etc. Trying to discuss wages solely through the lens of corporate greed and hiding behind technical economic jargon is a cheap trick I'm not going to entertain beyond calling out.


First of all, no job should be "shytty". That statement is absolutely typical of your condescending mind-state. All jobs are operated by human beings and as such should be afforded some kind of dignity, safety, and general consideration provided by the employers.
What dignity, safety and general consideration is provided to a mid level worker or even an executive by the employer that isn't afforded to a McDonalds franchise employee? Its a shytty job in that the value of the labor it requires is the lowest in the job pool, which means anyone who can't do anything but work there has no leverage. It always has been and always will be a job with high turnover, low pay and a need to leave to actually live.

You're living in a dream world where there is a "next step"... some people need to work to feed their families NOW.
Why is McDonalds responsible to mitigate the consequences of these peoples' bad life decisions? Are you seriously suggesting McDonalds is obligated to provide a good life for people who didn't make the decisions or effort to do so themselves???

They need to work TODAY, so we need to start thinking about their paycheques right now. The fact is that the minimum wage adjusted for inflation has actually gone DOWN in America, and clearly that hasn't helped anything. These companies are allowed to expand and suck profit out of otherwise unprofitable ventures by paying extremely low wages that distort the labour market, with the employees having to STILL take government assistance. A society should not be subsidizing such extremely low wages if it wants to see economic growth. 15 dollars an hour is hyperbole but you need two forces... one pushing for 15 and the other pushing for 0.

The labor market is not distorted. You are seeking to distort it by applying your subjective moral code as an objective legal obligation these companies owe society. The only things McDonalds is required to do is comply with the law, generate a profit for its shareholders, and provide a safe work environment for its employees while paying them at wages they agree to. This comes back to the point I was making about this compulsory aspect- nobody is forced to work at McDonalds. If these people are unhappy with their pay, they can get skills elsewhere. The big hole in your theory is that for these 400 or so people demanding more, there are thousands of people willing to take their place at the wages McDonalds mandates. These people took these jobs knowing what they would pay, knowing what the prospects for income and career growth were, and knowing what kind of leverage they had against the company. And they took them anyway. Why all of a sudden is McDonalds obligated to do more than what was originally agreed upon?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Ninjaz In Paris

ehyeh ašer ehyeh
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
15,213
Reputation
3,480
Daps
33,077
Reppin
Arcturus
Too many smart dumb nikka comments to quote... :skip:

Leverage for a job that requires no schooling, no skill, no trade... :skip:
 
Top