![]()
'I’m Black — You’re Not!': CNN Panel Explodes After Ana Navarro Tries to Compare Immigration to Slavery. Abby Phillip Frantically Cuts to Commerical Break
Another night, another knock-down, drag-out debate on CNN's “NewsNight.” The show, hosted by mild-mannered Abby Phillip, has become ground zero for fierceatlantablackstar.com
*Waits patiently for one of you clowns to deflect and defend this shyt*![]()
It’s not real. It’s something Spicy cacs made up in the 2020’s to tether off of Jim Crow and make it seem like they faced the same amount of oppression as FBAs.Juan Crow - Wikipedia
edit:
Research Portal
iro.uiowa.edu
The New Juan Crow: Modern-Day Consequences of Historic Racial Discrimination against Latino/a Americans
Gracie Mahoney
University of Iowa
Bachelor of Arts (BA), University of Iowa
Winter 2020
The New Juan Crow: Modern-Day Consequences of Historic Racial Dis177.02 kB
Abstract
The United States still has a problem with institutional discrimination against racial and ethnic groups outside of non-Hispanic whites. Similar to how political scientists and historians have enlightened readers about how historic Jim Crow laws still contribute to systemic racism against Black Americans today, this study outlines how “Juan Crow” laws against have contributed to a history of discrimination against Latino/a Americans in many aspects of public life. First, this paper examines the history of how Latinos/as are classified and how such classifications have aided both government-permitted and government-sponsored legal discrimination, prejudice, and even violence against Latinos prior to the 1960s. Next, there is a description of how the old Juan Crow has evolved into the inequality that contemporary Latinos/as face in the areas of housing and wealth, education, and criminal justice outcomes. Finally, two proposals, one for promoting positive educational narratives and Hispanic-Serving Institutions and one for promoting better representation in all levels of government, are offered as having the potential to begin helping dismantle the current system of institutional discrimination against Latino/a Americans.
And that statement doesn't even make sense. We weren't brought here illegally. The US allowed Americans to import slaves.
People just want to respond, not listen. The twitter captions don't help
YOU TOO?
SHE SAID PPL OTHER THAN BLACKS
WERE BROUGHT HERE ILLEGALLY.
I HEARD THE shyt CLEAR AS DAY
ON THE 1ST LISTEN
I heard what she said. That statement doesn't make since given the discussion. They were talking about illegal immigration. Slavery or importing slaves, involuntary immigration, was not illegal until the early to mid 1800s. This country supported the institution of slavery. The two have nothing to do with each other.
YOU TOO?
SHE SAID PPL OTHER THAN BLACKS
WERE BROUGHT HERE ILLEGALLY.
I HEARD THE shyt CLEAR AS DAY
ON THE 1ST LISTEN
I heard what she said. That statement doesn't make since given the discussion. They were talking about illegal immigration. Slavery or importing slaves, involuntary immigration, was not illegal until the early to mid 1800s. This country supported the institution of slavery. The two have nothing to do with each other.
So why bring up Black slaves? Maybe she was going finish her thought with a legitimate point but she was off to baffling start.
nikka SHE BASICALLY SAID
DESCENDANTS OF SLAVES
ARE THE ONLY PPL WHO
DIDN'T COME HERE AS IMMIGRANTS
AND A LOT OF THOSE PPL
CAME ILLEGALLY