Fight to the death

[LokoJdot]

This is something me and some friends always debated when we would be blazed out of our minds.... Armed with only a pocket knife... Would you rather take on a full grown tiger... Or a tiger shark (not no fuxking great white monster) . If you pick the shark, it's in basically a swimming pool , so you can see it, but it's deep enough so you can't stand or touch bottom.

 

[b@squ1@t]

riding lawnmower vs. retarded orange orangutan

who wins?

 

[Nefrodamus]

Jack Bauer vs. Liam Neeson

 

[Action Jackson]

A Full Grown Tiger? No thanks.

 

[Ohms Law]

Am i fighting this tiger shark on land?

 

[LokoJdot]

We always said it would be like a swimming pool, but deep enough where you couldn't stand.

 

[observe]

Def the tiger shark..it might not attack..I've swum in great white infested waters and they didnt attack me..I'm sure the tiger shark might not immediately attack me..sharks only attack surfers in wet suits cuz they look like seals..they don't normally attack people in swimming trunks..I'm sure I could kill it if it was swimming around my legs being curious

 

[ℒℴѵℯJay ELECTUA]

riding lawnmower vs. retarded orange orangutan

who wins?

@Jahmal

 

[LokoJdot]

@observe - I should have been more specific in the OP... This is a fight to the death , it's coming at you like crazy. Only you or the creature walk away. Me and my friends used to go crazy fighting bout this question.

 

[Mr. Pink]

The tiger.

Don't get me wrong, you have a snowball's chance in hell against both, but the tiger makes better sense because:

- the tiger will kill you faster. => less suffering,
- against the tiger you'll only die from trauma. Against the shark there's a chance you'll die from a combination of trauma and drowning. => less suffering
- the tiger will make sure you're dead before it starts eating you. The shark may start taking chunks of you while you're still alive. Not being eaten alive => less suffering

 

[LokoJdot]

Ok, some valid points of argument.

 

[LokoJdot]

Lol guess my first attempt at a thread was a fail..

 

[kp404]

The tiger.

Don't get me wrong, you have a snowball's chance in hell against both, but the tiger makes better sense because:

- the tiger will kill you faster. => less suffering,
- against the tiger you'll only die from trauma. Against the shark there's a chance you'll die from a combination of trauma and drowning. => less suffering
- the tiger will make sure you're dead before it starts eating you. The shark may start taking chunks of you while you're still alive. Not being eaten alive => less suffering

This is all pretty accurate

 

[All Knowledge]

Shark. Tiger is too agile and powerful. Don't think a shark can kill me in one bite, so I'd have more of a chance to gouge the eyes and fukk the gills up.

I'd probably die from blood loss either way, there's no way you'd make it out unscathed equipped with only a pocket knife. Especially if its was guaranteed that they'd attack and 'fight'.

 

[Poppa_Dock]

Definitely the shark. The tiger can just pin you down with it's 2 big ass arms and then start eating your neck. A shark can only attack with its face.