Fla Republicans ban Black people from using the word Black
- Thread starter NYC Rebel
- Start date
No the Dems abandoned us for non citizens because of their quest for globalization.
Is your argument that the Dems abandoned us to the Republicans?
The Republicans want to erase us and wipe us from memory
Rakim Allah
Superstar
Post like this is why. I barely post on here anymore.
This site fell the fukk off with all you whiny shills of white supremacist political parties.
The Honorable Malcolm el-Hajj Malik el-Shabazz X is rolling over in his grave, friends.
NYC Rebel
...on the otherside of the pond
This has zero to do with Dems. You brought them up for no reason
The point is, that rhetoric is all good until people in power remind where actual values lie.
Outlaw
New Hope For the HaveNotz
Biden dikk rode black identity more than any president ever and he was rewarded with Trump as a successor
Tether black here, should I be concerned?
I Really Mean It
Veteran
smart dumb militant drivel.One party abandoned us and became globalist the other wants to erase us
Fukk boffum
black people, while not perfect, were doing more than decent under the status quo, but you slow witted, easily led, uneducated flunkies of tariq and other youtube charlatans had to fukk up a good thing.
This is the nationwide plan. A lot of things rolled out in Florida would have more motion if DeSantis didn't prove to be a terrible Presidential candidate. If he was buzzing, other statehouses would be putting pressure on institutions.
Also disappointed in the babble in this thread
Also disappointed in the babble in this thread
Dr Claude told us 30 years ago
"The sharper operational response came from Cecil Howard, Associate Provost and Interim Dean of the College of Law, who emailed students and reporters to clarify the situation. Howard said that after News 6 Orlando reported that certain words had been flagged, he met directly with the students involved “to provide clarification and to state unequivocally: the word ‘Black’ is not prohibited. No such restriction exists, and none has been directed by university leadership.”
Howard explained the issue was “a staff-level error—an overly cautious interpretation that went beyond what the law requires,” and that the university immediately engaged a Florida higher-education law expert who confirmed that neither state law nor Board of Governors rules ban use of the word “Black” or the phrase “Black History Month.” He added, “I fully concur with this expert legal opinion.”
To prevent a repeat, the College of Law has implemented several steps: an enhanced review process for student promotional materials, a standardized escalation protocol, a secondary review mechanism, and alignment of the law college’s communications review with main-campus practices. Pending full rollout, Howard says he will assume final review and approval authority for event communications. He also reminded students that the university’s grievance process is available if they believe policies are misapplied.
The original concern — voiced by student organizers who said reviewers flagged phrases such as “Black,” “women,” and “affirmative action” — sparked alarm on an HBCU campus and prompted broader debate about how public universities interpret rules around state funding and DEI. FAMU’s latest statements say that interpretation, not law, triggered the confusion and that steps are now in place to clarify policy and protect student expression.
We have updated our earlier coverage to reflect these statements. BET will continue to follow how campus leaders implement the promised changes and whether students feel those fixes restore confidence in the approval process."
www.bet.com
Howard explained the issue was “a staff-level error—an overly cautious interpretation that went beyond what the law requires,” and that the university immediately engaged a Florida higher-education law expert who confirmed that neither state law nor Board of Governors rules ban use of the word “Black” or the phrase “Black History Month.” He added, “I fully concur with this expert legal opinion.”
To prevent a repeat, the College of Law has implemented several steps: an enhanced review process for student promotional materials, a standardized escalation protocol, a secondary review mechanism, and alignment of the law college’s communications review with main-campus practices. Pending full rollout, Howard says he will assume final review and approval authority for event communications. He also reminded students that the university’s grievance process is available if they believe policies are misapplied.
The original concern — voiced by student organizers who said reviewers flagged phrases such as “Black,” “women,” and “affirmative action” — sparked alarm on an HBCU campus and prompted broader debate about how public universities interpret rules around state funding and DEI. FAMU’s latest statements say that interpretation, not law, triggered the confusion and that steps are now in place to clarify policy and protect student expression.
We have updated our earlier coverage to reflect these statements. BET will continue to follow how campus leaders implement the promised changes and whether students feel those fixes restore confidence in the approval process."
Banned By Bureaucracy? FAMU Students Say They Can’t Say ‘Black’ On Campus
As state funding rules collide with campus celebrations, students said the school’s guidance during Black History Month at an HBCU is frustrating.
RickyDiBiase
aka Hash Brown Hands
Yeah any world power worth a shyt practices globalization for a reason.
Look at Rwanda from ‘94 to today and tell me how bad “globalization” is.
No matter what, the students shouldn't have to clear this kinda stuff. It's not as dire as say heartbeat bills making doctors have to guess when they can intercede on behalf of a mother, but these malicious ass white supremacist laws will make institutions hesitate to run afoul of it."The sharper operational response came from Cecil Howard, Associate Provost and Interim Dean of the College of Law, who emailed students and reporters to clarify the situation. Howard said that after News 6 Orlando reported that certain words had been flagged, he met directly with the students involved “to provide clarification and to state unequivocally: the word ‘Black’ is not prohibited. No such restriction exists, and none has been directed by university leadership.”
Howard explained the issue was “a staff-level error—an overly cautious interpretation that went beyond what the law requires,” and that the university immediately engaged a Florida higher-education law expert who confirmed that neither state law nor Board of Governors rules ban use of the word “Black” or the phrase “Black History Month.” He added, “I fully concur with this expert legal opinion.”
To prevent a repeat, the College of Law has implemented several steps: an enhanced review process for student promotional materials, a standardized escalation protocol, a secondary review mechanism, and alignment of the law college’s communications review with main-campus practices. Pending full rollout, Howard says he will assume final review and approval authority for event communications. He also reminded students that the university’s grievance process is available if they believe policies are misapplied.
The original concern — voiced by student organizers who said reviewers flagged phrases such as “Black,” “women,” and “affirmative action” — sparked alarm on an HBCU campus and prompted broader debate about how public universities interpret rules around state funding and DEI. FAMU’s latest statements say that interpretation, not law, triggered the confusion and that steps are now in place to clarify policy and protect student expression.
We have updated our earlier coverage to reflect these statements. BET will continue to follow how campus leaders implement the promised changes and whether students feel those fixes restore confidence in the approval process."
Banned By Bureaucracy? FAMU Students Say They Can’t Say ‘Black’ On Campus
As state funding rules collide with campus celebrations, students said the school’s guidance during Black History Month at an HBCU is frustrating.
Even if it's a dud, any litigation from the government costs the university too much.
HarlemHottie
Uptown Thoroughbred
If it had been framed that way, we'd largely agree. The problem here is, African and pan Africanists are not operating in good faith. I could actually make the argument that they're operating as agents for the Trump admin.
Why else are they working so hard to get us in the streets? Everyday, there's an alarmist post with an inflammatory headline intended to get us mad. Why?