We got Canadians in here calling dudes soft.![]()
another L to add to your list
We got Canadians in here calling dudes soft.![]()
Care to show me this list of Ls![]()
dont have the time to go into again. just wanted to make my rounds, ruffle some feathers and KIM


omgggg what fight is this
Lara/Anguloomgggg what fight is this

Real Talk, it kinda is.
I mean even Floyd's biggest stans say the same shyt (That Floyd would KO Manny although ignoring the fact that JMM got 4 tries at it.)![]()

I also notice that Floyd stans LOVE using triangle theories, but only in Floyd's favor.
i.e JMM KOing Manny Pacquiao, but Floyd beating JMM = Floyd can beat Manny.
But, for example, someone says Khan just destroyed Alexander, who made easy work of Maidana, who Floyd struggled with = Khan's style can give Floyd trouble, the Floydcomes out
![]()

I also notice that Floyd stans LOVE using triangle theories, but only in Floyd's favor.
i.e JMM KOing Manny Pacquiao, but Floyd beating JMM = Floyd can beat Manny.
But, for example, someone can say "Well, Khan just destroyed Alexander, who made easy work of Maidana, who Floyd struggled with = Khan's style can give Floyd trouble"....and then the Floydcomes out
![]()
nikka you just use a triangle theory saying Kahn beat Judah easier so he would cause Floyd problems lol

judah didn't even give Floyd any problems, the best shot he landed was the low blow

nobody uses triangle theories when it comes to Floyd, Floyd adjusts to every style he faces regardless so it's no need for any triangle theory

and you acting as if Devon looked spectacular against maidana, shyt was a terrible fight across the broad, he got cut , and didn't look special at all
