High capacity magazines are needed when criminals attack in mobs.
Than hand gun may not cut it
we live in da United States of America 
aint no mobs gonna terrorizes communities
u nikkaz watch too much movies

High capacity magazines are needed when criminals attack in mobs.
Than hand gun may not cut it
we live in da United States of America 

And Nigerian can't sue me because that name is already a registered trademark by someone![]()
is it time to make a thread
If 'need' determined legality... you would be living out of a straw hut and growing ur own food... I'm sure the king of NY owns thing without a need to own those things.
what ur point?what ur point?
do cilivians have the ability to purchase fighter jets, tanks, rocker launchers etc...etc...
There are civilians who own all those things. Most of the FJ are disarmed however... but if someone is wealthy they can customize and equip the jet.its illegal to own them -u know this mannnnnn
Anyway, i don't know how that's relevant. What relevant is that you can't use your judgment of a person's need to determine if it should be legal or not. That's not how the law works. You can't smoke in restaurants because clear evidence shows that you could be killing some random kid. There's no study to show that me owning my weapon for home defense will contribute to the mass killing or brutal murders that plague this nation.relevant
my judgement is whats the purposes of high capacity clips/mags -who are u at war with
listen... if in a ideal world, i wouldnt give two shyts on people purchasing these mags/clips but we live in a free open society & crazy/evil people dont need easy access for them
Now if we keep attacking citizens rights about guns, and not advocate for a pure mental health check bill... then I may be crazy due to childhood abuses - slip through the background cracks, murk 20 people and have everyone blame the rifle on my actions.
nobody attacking ur right to have a gun
why do yall spin the convo -nobody taking ur gun(s)
we just need to regulate things
your right,,,
except for the fact that it's not illegal to own those things if you say they don't work. You can collect them if you have enuf cash.
gun supporters sound like fukking morons. the crux of your argument comes down to, "you know what will stop gun violence?....more guns!"
you guys aren't helping your cause.

What would you do if a terrorist like the Boston bomber was running loose and looking for a place to hide. Wouldn't you feel more secure if you had an AR-15 or a powerful weapon at home to protect your family assuming he shows up there?
Why would anyone be against responsible citizens owning guns?![]()
gun supporters sound like fukking morons. the crux of your argument comes down to, "you know what will stop gun violence?....more guns!"
you guys aren't helping your cause.
What would you do if a terrorist like the Boston bomber was running loose and looking for a place to hide. Wouldn't you feel more secure if you had an AR-15 or a powerful weapon at home to protect your family assuming he shows up there?
Why would anyone be against responsible citizens owning guns?![]()
i'd rather he not have similar or better weaponry than police officers in the first place. it would probably make catching him/her a lot simpler. i'd rather he not have similar or better weaponry than police officers in the first place. it would probably make catching him/her a lot simpler.
besides, i have a feeling that 2 trained terrorists would probably subdue me pretty quickly, if they come in with bombs attached to their fukkin chest.
you have a weak mindset. Criminals don't follow the law. Only way is to arm responsible citizens.
You can ban AR-15's all you want...a criminal will always find ways to get one.
Only way to stop a bad guy with an AR-15 is a good gut with an AR-15