For Black people only: why did so many of you believe O.J. was innocent? His DNA/blood was ALL over the crime scene. The defense played y'all bad.

CodeKansas

Superstar
Joined
Dec 5, 2017
Messages
7,885
Reputation
2,058
Daps
30,177
I'm bout to head bed. I'll check in tomorrow to see if this thread turns into a Neg Train on OP. :lolbron:
 

O.T.I.S.

Veteran
Joined
Sep 15, 2013
Messages
82,629
Reputation
18,024
Daps
319,105
Reppin
The Truth
OJ didn't do it

  1. Nicole Brown & Ron Goldman were both high-level drug dealers
  2. Ron Goldman & Nicole Brown's friend Brett Cantor (& connect) was killed the EXACT SAME WAY a year earlier.
  3. Ron Goldman's friend Michael Nigg was murdered a year later
  4. The blood evidence was admittedly mishandled & had EDTA tainted from the crime lab, which had missing vials of blood
  5. Mark Fuhrman plead the 5th when asked if he planted blood
  6. He had planted a knife on a Black man & cost the city $100,000 a few years earlier
  7. Johnny Cochran proved OJ's "bloody sock" didn't have OJ's foot in it at the time the blood was placed on the sock
  8. blood that was on O.J.s gate was proven planted because media pictures showed that it wasn't there the day after the murders, but somehow showed up a few days later
  9. A witness saw 4 Latino/Italian men running away from the scene, there was cap with "Mediterranean" DNA found at the scene
  10. The coroner said 4 men committed the crime
  11. The LAPD was caught setting up a bunch of Black & Hispanic Men for crimes at the same time this was happening. "Training Day" was based on that.
  12. Ron Goldman was a 6ft body builder & martial artist who fought with his killer & hit them hard, meaning his attacker would have wounds/bruises on him from the fight
  13. OJ was 47, had arthritis, bad knees, & a bad back
  14. OJ had ZERO defense marks on him, just a small cut on his ring finger
  15. Neither Ron or Nicole had OJ's DNA under their fingernails.
Exactly

All this plus the WAY they were murdered.. the bolded specifically.


OJ as an older man supposedly in a “rage of passion” is not slitting throats and pulling their tongues through them.
 

CodeBlaMeVi

I love not to know so I can know more...
Supporter
Joined
Oct 3, 2013
Messages
39,106
Reputation
3,641
Daps
107,212
I don’t speak on it because Idc to buy and read the transcripts.
 

seemorecizzy

Superstar
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
16,671
Reputation
2,562
Daps
54,235
Reppin
NULL
we talk about the case to this today because there is reasonable doubt regarding whether he did it or not. This thread is proof of that doubt as well. Hundreds of documentaries have been made about this because no body knows for certain what happened.

you can make an argument for both sides. Not guilty was the right call
 

Richard Glidewell

Yall done tore all the bottom of ya shoes w/me!!!
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
9,021
Reputation
2,493
Daps
25,792
While yall bullshytting trying to still slander an innocent man who is no longer with us and STILL suffered unjust imprisonment......... the real killers is still out there.......stay woke
 

Dave24

Superstar
Joined
Dec 11, 2015
Messages
17,533
Reputation
2,819
Daps
23,384
OJ's dead man. Why do you care about this in 2025?
Alexander the Great is dead. Julius Caesar is dead. Martin Luther King Jr. is dead. Abraham Lincoln is dead. Michael Jackson is dead. Elvis Presley is dead. We discuss significant figures in history. If you are someone who is signifcant you will be discussed and analyzed even if you have been dead for many years. People are still discussing Kobe Bryant on the coli. Does it bother you people still discuss him and compare him to Michael Jordan?

The OJ Simpson trial was fascinating and controversial. I feel a case can be made that he was innocent as well as guilty. That is why we still care. Why does OJ being dead take away from that?
 
Top