I don’t have a problem using new terms or identities if they properly define a person.
I am proud of all of our histories here in this country. I think we need to study more of our history here instead of needing to go all the way back to Africa looking for Kings and Queens. That is escapism to me and also an insecurity. People want to be associated with greatness, but instead of discovering the magnificent things that slaves have done on our soil, we forgo a knowledge of that for “Kemet”.
I am proud to be a descendant of slaves. But not all of my black ancestors in the US were enslaved. The term ADOS ignores them and their story which is why I can’t fully embrace the term. I mentioned before, I would prefer a term like “American Descendants of Colonial Africans” or “Descendants of Colonial Africans” which is broad enough to include all classes of African persons (enslaved, free, indentured) while also making a distinction about their colonial heritage.
Outside of that, I’m a person that loves power. I do. It has an aroma that arouses me. Black people have more power if we coalesce and formate up. And the best chance of that is through pan-Africanism which is why I won’t be able to fully give that up even though sometimes it may appear to some of us to be a one-sided relationship. The future to me consist of the ability to move ideas, resources, and capital with ease between Atlanta, Jacmel, Bahia, Luanda, Jo-burg, Mombasa, South London, back to Compton. And my hope is that Sub-Saharan African countries will stand up and step into their roles as being leaders of the African race while defending their sons and daughters scattered across the globe. It’s a tall ask considering their internal plights but I have to hold out for that hope.