The songs were bangers when they came out…a lot of factors besides just the beat make a song a hit/hot record. I just think the beats sound super simple and basic…that doesn’t necessarily have to mean ass…it just means simple and basic.
This is the point right here.
In '98, when I first heard "Money, Cash, Hoes", I thought it was dope and different. But then as the weeks went on, and every Swizz joint I heard had that exact same approach and the overly used cymbals, pad stabs, and the same kick and snare, etc. I thought it was some bullsh*t, lol. And a lot of legendary producers at the time did too. Because it was some basic level sh*t that no other producer off the street wouldn't have been able to get off, if they weren't connected. So as X's popularity climbed, so did Swizz's. That's not a coincidence. People wanted to get whatever was hot or popular at the time, and that sound was winning for like 18 months.
All 4 tracks that were posted by OP are classic, but that doesn't mean that those beats aren't bullsh*t too, lol. Premier was making sh*t like "Above The Clouds" around this time. Pete Rock had "The Game" with Ghost and Rae. Hi-Tek had "Respiration" with Common and Black Star. Young Lord had "You Ain't a Killer" with Big Pun. "Nas is Like" was made around this time. The standard was high AF!! There's a difference in quality that's mad obvious. So yeah, certain sh*t can be mad popular and still be bullsh*t. I liked Swizz's work early on, but after awhile, like someone else said in here, those joints sounded dated within a few years. It was hype. And in the moment, I dug it, but after years I was like "WTF was that?"
Listen to "Memphis Bleek Is". That's when I knew something was wrong. In '99, I was a kid, and definitely caught up in the moment. But nah, listening now, this is definitely a joke of a track. Most of his sh*t back then was. I can't listen to this today with a straight face.
