Mantis Toboggan M.D.

I’m here for the scraps
Joined
Mar 18, 2014
Messages
33,795
Reputation
10,069
Daps
111,668
Reppin
Brooklyn
There is a lot of stuff funnier than the stuff that you mentioned. Just off the top of my head I can reel these things off:

1. The people that are always claiming to be the most patriotic (the Republicans) are the very ones openly playing footsie with one of America's biggest enemy (Russia).

2. A guy that was just elected President of the USA is openly hostile towards the secret police (CIA) of his own Country and is refusing to take information from them. However, that same man has used hacked documents from the secret police of America's biggest enemy in order to win the election.

3. The USA literally destroyed the economy of Soviet Russia just 3 decades back, which basically reduced Russia to 3rd World status. The USA used spies and everything to bring Russia down. Now the President elect of the USA is openly flirting with Russia. In the past the President elect has even asked Russia to hack into the emails of a former Secretary of State of the USA. I can assume that he takes intelligence briefings from the Russians too, because he has asked him to get him info on the USA.

4. That Holy Rolling Pence is the Vice President of Donald Trump who is far less than Holy.

5. A man was just elected President due to his supposed business acumen actually filed bankruptcy for his business 6 times.
Donald Trump's six bankruptcies, detailed

There is a bunch of more crazy stuff out there if you stopped and thought about it.
His campaign was outright treasonous on multiple occasions. He didn't even try to hide it. The worst part is hearing people try to defend that and his bankruptcies through the most absurd mental gymnastics you'll ever see.
 

Celerii

Picture me rollin', sixes, money foldin'
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
1,019
Reputation
-360
Daps
3,759
Reppin
igboland
Hillary has never been the issue.

The worst thing ever has come to pass. Either you think it's cool and funny or you are someone I can relate to and you thing it's terrible.

Line in the sand type shyt.

I wouldn't care if Paul Reubens would have been on the Dem side. Defending Trump is unforgivable.

Clear enough?
i dont think they were defending trump. they just want to see evidence.
 

Pull Up the Roots

Talking? During horse head bookends?
Joined
Sep 15, 2015
Messages
26,432
Reputation
13,872
Daps
113,689
Reppin
Detroit
Is this the new CIA and Bush saying Iraq got "Weapons Mass of destruction "

or Obama administration (France & Hillary) War on Gaddafi


Or JFK the Cuban Missile Crisis....

same fake news media who claims Russia hacked our election. Crazy how the more things change the more they stay the same
Weird how Trump supporters keep repeating this. I think you mean the DIA - Defense Intelligence Agency. Not the CIA wrt Iraq. They actually pushed back against the DIA's report. And the news media isn't claiming that Russia hacked our election - whatever that means - just that they interfered. They were behind the DNC hacks. The DCC hacks. And it was just revealed that they hacked the Republicans too, but decided to hold onto the info. . But go ahead and close your ears to whatever is uncomfortable for you.
 

Celerii

Picture me rollin', sixes, money foldin'
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
1,019
Reputation
-360
Daps
3,759
Reppin
igboland
Weird how Trump supporters keep repeating this. I think you mean the DIA - Defense Intelligence Agency. Not the CIA wrt Iraq. They actually pushed back against the DIA's report. And the news media isn't claiming that Russia hacked our election - whatever that means - just that they interfered. They were behind the DNC hacks. The DCC hacks. And it was just revealed that they hacked the Republicans too, but decided to hold onto the info. . But go ahead and close your ears to whatever is uncomfortable for you.
1. wikieaks doesnt work for the russian govt
2. wikileaks LEAKS the information that hackers give to them. they make sure the documents are accurtae and then they publish them. if they didnt receive accurate info on trump, its probs why they didnt release any.
3. wikileaks has released more things about republicans than democrats (especially during bush's presidency).
 

The American

Defending America against cacs
Joined
Jan 21, 2016
Messages
3,623
Reputation
-748
Daps
6,497
so you think we should end our tradition of a peaceful transition of power just because your candidate didnt win? if hillary had won, would you agree with trump if he said the exact same thing? :jbhmm:
Babygirl, you need to drop your pics in my inbox so I'll know u ain't an altright CAC.

Stopping trump isn't ending our tradition of peaceful transition, he was elected thru illegal means, his win is illegitimate. He must not be inaugurated.

Russia hates HRC, so she wouldn't have won with their help. Trump wouldn't be able to say the same thing, Putin wants her dead.

Now send me them pics, you sure don't act like a Nigerian sometimes.
 

Celerii

Picture me rollin', sixes, money foldin'
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
1,019
Reputation
-360
Daps
3,759
Reppin
igboland
Babygirl, you need to drop your pics in my inbox so I'll know u ain't an altright CAC.

Stopping trump isn't ending our tradition of peaceful transition, he was elected thru illegal means, his win is illegitimate. He must not be inaugurated.

Russia hates HRC, so she wouldn't have won with their help. Trump wouldn't be able to say the same thing, Putin wants her dead.

Now send me them pics, you sure don't act like a Nigerian sometimes.
1. i dont agree with the electoral college either, but its a part of our govt and its legal.
2. do you have any proof that putin wants her dead?
3. from day 1 when democrats started spewing this russian nonsense, i knew it was because they had no argument against what wikileaks had released.

they couldnt defend the millions of dollars she has taken for speeches. they couldnt defend that she openly supported trade deals like NAFTA and TPP.
4. i hate trump and hillary. ctiticizing either one of them does not mean you support the other. both democrats and repubs are despicable imo.



 
Last edited:

AV Dicey

All Star
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
1,600
Reputation
20
Daps
3,254
Reppin
Juan Roberto's bald spot
:yawn: they been pushing this Russia shyt since they noticed Hillary might lose.

Where is the evidence?

You can't say "aww where were the RNC emails :mjcry:"
Because you have no clue who hacked the emails and where they are from.

And if you have a clue, I ask again, where is the evidence?
the intelligence agencies say they hacked both parties. The Russians never thought Hillary would lose, their game plan was releasing even more damaging emails after she wins to cripple her presidency.
Republicans in their short sightedness will soon realize that when if they flex on Mother Russia will also get their shyt leaked creating all sorts of crisis in the governing party, which is clearly a much better use of stolen documents than putting them out there in the midst of an election. You get more bang for your buck when you release emails of the secretary of state shytting on his president during tense international negotiations.
In other words, they got the Americans by the short and curlies but dont let me tell you that :hubie:its #maga outchea!

The deep dive will reiterate what the Russians and Chinese have been saying about western democracies and what Americans in their obstinacy refuse to concede. Your freedoms and values allow for certain vulnerabilities. Case in point, you hack Putin's emails trying to undermine him, it never takes hold in Russia since he controls the media :ehh: Good thing you now have a strongman leader and those 'values' can simply be curtailed in the effort to #maga :blessed:


strange times indeed
 

Pull Up the Roots

Talking? During horse head bookends?
Joined
Sep 15, 2015
Messages
26,432
Reputation
13,872
Daps
113,689
Reppin
Detroit
1. wikieaks doesnt work for the russian govt
2. wikileaks LEAKS the information that hackers give to them. they make sure the documents are accurtae and then they publish them. if they didnt receive accurate info on trump, its probs why they didnt release any.
3. wikileaks has released more things about republicans than democrats (especially during bush's presidency).
Did you mean to quote someone else? Or did you just not understand that the "they" is referring to Russia?

And I don't need a history lesson on WikiLeaks. I know full well what they represent now. And how they changed after Domscheit-Berg left. For whatever reason, they started spreading Russian propaganda about MH17. They downplayed the Panama Papers and also called them anti-Russia propaganda. They even omit mentions of Russia from their leaks and so on.
 

keepemup

Banned
Joined
Jun 9, 2012
Messages
4,740
Reputation
-1,008
Daps
5,345
:yawn: they been pushing this Russia shyt since they noticed Hillary might lose.

Where is the evidence?

You can't say "aww where were the RNC emails :mjcry:"
Because you have no clue who hacked the emails and where they are from.

And if you have a clue, I ask again, where is the evidence?
Breh, they admit in this very same article, they have no evidence.

The CIA presentation to senators about Russia’s intentions fell short of a formal U.S. assessment produced by all 17 intelligence agencies. A senior U.S. official said there were minor disagreements among intelligence officials about the agency’s assessment, in part because some questions remain unanswered.

For example, intelligence agencies do not have specific intelligence showing officials in the Kremlin “directing” the identified individuals to pass the Democratic emails to WikiLeaks, a second senior U.S. official said. Those actors, according to the official, were “one step” removed from the Russian government, rather than government employees. Moscow has in the past used middlemen to participate in sensitive intelligence operations so it has plausible deniability.
 

SmokyQuartz

Young Skull
Joined
Nov 17, 2016
Messages
5,278
Reputation
3,664
Daps
47,553
Reppin
Chicago, IL
The ramifications are insane for either side. If Trump gets caught working with Russia, that's pretty much WW3 on deck and Trump supporters will be cast as traitors to the country. If the CIA does not come with the receipts, Trump will/should sue the fukk out them and may even establish his own intelligence agency. The fukkery thickens i can taste it :ohlawd:
 

b_low_brown

Daddyface
Joined
Dec 5, 2012
Messages
12,297
Reputation
-4,154
Daps
35,392
They have zero proof the Russians are behind the leaks. They spread the rumor earlier, and now come out with this non specific, misleading, fake news and simple minded people connect the two subconsciously. “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.” - Joseph Goebbels
 

Celerii

Picture me rollin', sixes, money foldin'
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
1,019
Reputation
-360
Daps
3,759
Reppin
igboland
Breh, they admit in this very same article, they have no evidence.

The CIA presentation to senators about Russia’s intentions fell short of a formal U.S. assessment produced by all 17 intelligence agencies. A senior U.S. official said there were minor disagreements among intelligence officials about the agency’s assessment, in part because some questions remain unanswered.

For example, intelligence agencies do not have specific intelligence showing officials in the Kremlin “directing” the identified individuals to pass the Democratic emails to WikiLeaks, a second senior U.S. official said. Those actors, according to the official, were “one step” removed from the Russian government, rather than government employees. Moscow has in the past used middlemen to participate in sensitive intelligence operations so it has plausible deniability.
they wont listen tho :coffee:. as they criticize trump supporters for falling for fake news, they force themselves to believe the narrative that the mainstream media pushes, even when they have no evidence.
 
Top