From Russia with Trump

[Celerii]

its not about 'doing wrong', since they write the rules. its the fact that they were blatantly in the tank for hillary, and it was disgusting to watch. they had pre-decided that she was the one back in 08, never mind that she was being investigated by the fbi

ive said it before, even made a thread on it. didnt get any responses of merit

- how the fukk can the democrats cry about trump winning the electoral college when their own nomination process uses "super delegates"

 

[Isaiah Bradley]

1. The DNC didn't break any rules.

2. Read the source document : Bears in the Midst: Intrusion into the Democratic National Committee »

3. Russians leaked emails to influence the election. Its literally psychological warfare meant to undermine trust in the system.

Here is why thats a huge problem:

but how much trust in the system is established when Bernie supporters were accusing the DNC of undermining him, prior to the wikileaks emails and the primary results, just for weeks later to have their suspicions confirmed
The DNC nor Hillary's campaign challenged the contents of the email, so the Russian hack group committed at provable worst, a Snowden exposal of the psychological warfare being executed by both the DNC and Hillary

Joy Reid, MSNBC, CNN and FOX are what's wrong with the relationship between the political system and the media, that's suppose to help citizens keep our politicans in check. Their relationship undermines the trust in the system, more than any hacking group releasing emails

 

[b_low_brown]

What did the DNC do wrong?

lets get into it...cause its clear y'all don't read past headlines

Inciting violence at trump rallies for starters

Oh wait.. that wasn't even a fukking headline because the clinton owned media didn't let it become one




You're a fukkin agent fam. It's blatantly obvious at this point g.

My nikka really sat here and said "what the DNC even do??"

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

but how much trust in the system is established when Bernie supporters were accusing the DNC of undermining him, prior to the wikileaks emails and the primary results, just for weeks later to have their suspicions confirmed
The DNC nor Hillary's campaign challenged the contents of the email, so the Russian hack group committed at provable worst, a Snowden exposal of the psychological warfare being executed by both the DNC and Hillary

Joy Reid, MSNBC, CNN and FOX are what's wrong with the relationship between the political system and the media, that's suppose to help citizens keep our politicans in check. Their relationship undermines the trust in the system, more than any hacking group releasing emails

1. Bernie was a democrat for like 15 minutes. Hillary raised more money for the DNC than damn near anyone. The DNC aint' fukking with johnny-come-lately's.

2. What did the DNC do wrong? You haven't answered this

3. So now you're mad at the news itself?

Fine.

The CIA rarely makes public statements. Remember that.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

its not about 'doing wrong', since they write the rules. its the fact that they were blatantly in the tank for hillary, and it was disgusting to watch. they had pre-decided that she was the one back in 08, never mind that she was being investigated by the fbi

ive said it before, even made a thread on it. didnt get any responses of merit

- how the fukk can the democrats cry about trump winning the electoral college when their own nomination process uses "super delegates"

the DNC is not a federal organization

 

[b_low_brown]

Look at this agent posting irrelevant tweets instead of the evidence showing Russia hacked ANYTHING.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

no, it isnt cool. but i have a bigger issue with the DNC's conduct

the russians did the average american voter a favor. hillary clinton and her cronies, not so much

there was nothing wrong with the DNC's conduct.

Thats the point.

They talked about doing shyt...and never did.

Because those were Internal random ass emails.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Look at this agent posting irrelevant tweets instead of the evidence showing Russia hacked ANYTHING.

I already posted several source documents showing Russia did it.

You just wanna be hard-headed...and its obvious you know nothing about hacking anyways, so whats the point?

Heres another company: THreatConnect: showing Russia as behind the attacks: You are being redirected...

These are LEADING cyber security firms.

 

[Celerii]

1. Bernie was a democrat for like 15 minutes. Hillary raised more money for the DNC than damn near anyone. The DNC aint' fukking with johnny-come-lately's.

2. What did the DNC do wrong? You haven't answered this

3. So now you're mad at the news itself?

Fine.

The CIA rarely makes public statements. Remember that.

1. how do you think hillary raised that money? because as far as i know, she wasnt getting donations of $27 from avg americans, she was getting donations of $270,000 from large corporations. the fact that u are praising her for the amount of money she raised just shows that u support our corrupt political system

2. it doesnt fukking matter if bernie was a democrat for 15 minutes. it is wriiten in dnc rulebook that they are NOT SUPPOSED TO SUPPORT ONE CANDIDATE OVER THE OTHERS! they scheduled debates rarely and when they did, it was at times when they would get thelowest ratings, they did everythng in their power to undermine bernie. cant you see that?

 

[b_low_brown]

I already posted several source documents showing Russia did it.

You just wanna be hard-headed...and its obvious you know nothing about hacking anyways, so whats the point?

Heres another company: THreatConnect: showing Russia as behind the attacks: You are being redirected...

These are LEADING cyber security firms.

Oh.. okay. The page YOU sent clearly says

Although the proof is not conclusive, we assess Guccifer 2.0 most likely is a Russian denial and deception (D&D) effort that has been cast to so

What's that you said about not reading past headlines?


Bro just admit there isn't evidence.

 

[SmokyQuartz]

We told our own government with our inaction, and tech purchases it was cool to spy on us. Now privacy is a concern?

Just admit you're salty DNC got exposed for the shytfest it really was

This Russian shyt is a desperate ploy to get us to ignore the fact the democrats (who blacks so desperately depend on) is a shyt show in all actuality

Thanks to Hillary multiple countries know our sensitive information. Where was the outrage when that went down?

Yall closet Trump supporters need to stop with the deflections. I'm the farthest thing from a Democrat, and i roasted Hillary and the DNC when the leaks came out. Now that the Democrats are finished we can turn our attention to Trump, yea nikka i feel that heartbeat in ya ass. So your fine with RUSSIA hacking into American databases as long as its against the other team? But once information is exposing Trump you wanna play dumb and you even asked were the evidence was, @ThreeLetterAgency showed you some evidence and you still wanna play dumb and bring up Hillary

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

1. how do you think hillary raised that money? because as far as i know, she wasnt getting donations of $27 from avg americans, she was getting donations of $270,000 from large corporations. the fact that u are praising her for the amount of money she raised just shows that u support our corrupt political system

2. it doesnt fukking matter if bernie was a democrat for 15 minutes. it is wriiten in dnc rulebook that they are NOT SUPPOSED TO SUPPORT ONE CANDIDATE OVER THE OTHERS! they scheduled debates rarely and when they did, it was at times when they would get thelowest ratings, they did everythng in their power to undermine bernie. cant you see that?

1. She's a former First Lady and senator, and secretary of state...of course she's gonna make money you fukking idiot.

2. Except, they didn't do anything to Bernie. Bernie lost most states by landslides.

 

[SirReginald]

I didn't say you were but the dude you tweeted sounds like a definite Trump supporter. @ThreeLetterAgency is already exposing receipts and people who defend Trump on this thread are pretending to ignore it......... that's not intellectual

So, people who criticize Hillary must be a Trump supporter That makes zero sense. I criticize Hillary all the time and I don't support Trump.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Oh.. okay. The page YOU sent clearly says




What's that you said about not reading past headlines?


Bro just admit there isn't evidence.

its not conclusive because of the nature of cyber attribution is not like solving a murder mystery.