fukk Macy's and their little underground Prison too!!! :pacspit:

[Drones]

So because it's a retail store, they don't have the right to hold a perpetrator and try to get their value back? But if it's a homeowner or car jacking victim, then it's different?

Ah, ok. So you replied with willful ignorance because you're either a troll or a cac (probably both) trying to derail the conversation. Carry on.

 

[ORDER_66]

So because it's a retail store, they don't have the right to hold a perpetrator and try to get their value back? But if it's a homeowner or car jacking victim, then it's different?



Again. Now what about the future shoplifter thief?
If Macy's has a history of discrimination and profiling, then let the punishment fit the crime

Removing their ability to deal with real shoplifters to punish them for discrimination and profiling of non-shoplifters is ridiculous and is emotional based

A store cannot detain anyone in these conditions against their will... Even the judge ruled on this!!! you give the cops the description of the perp and let them do the fukking job... The thing they should do is take them to an office review the tapes if they stole then call the cops if they didnt and they have the receipts let them go... They basically EXTORTED this woman!!!

 

[Isaiah Bradley]

Ah, ok. So you replied with willful ignorance because you're either a troll or a cac (probably both) trying to derail the conversation. Carry on.

and you replied with labels and dismissive tactics to simple questions. Carry on.

A store cannot detain anyone in these conditions against their will... Even the judge ruled on this!!! you give the cops the description of the perp and let them do the fukking job... The thing they should do is take them to an office review the tapes if they stole then call the cops if they didnt and they have the receipts let them go... They basically EXTORTED this woman!!!

What's the difference between detaining and to "take a person to an office"? Both allow you to review the tapes

Which goes back to the point...

They need to pay a penalty for that
Now what about the future shoplifter thief?

Hmm...call the cops. have employees hold the perpetrator, encourage timely physical altercations between innocent employees and a perpetrator, who may or may not have anything to lose, while waiting for the police?

I mean are you fukking serious???

Macy's needs to pay for their wrong, but not for the ability to detain and to get their money back

 

[Sonny Bonds]

They have them in Publix?! Is it really that serious?

Their carrot cake loaf used to be hitting tho...

It wasn't even in the city. The store was in the suburbs of Atlanta.

 

[ORDER_66]

What's the difference between detaining and to "take a person to an office"? Both allow you to review the tapes

You know the difference between a jail cell in a fukking basement and a store office you dumb muthafukka...

 

[Cave Savage]

I hope the next guard who tries this gets his fukked up

 

[Isaiah Bradley]

You know the difference between a jail cell in a fukking basement and a store office you dumb muthafukka...

name calling, instead of just answering the question? smh

Yet another person content with symbolic victories instead of practical solutions

EDIT: I guess all innocent and guilty alike will voluntarily walk to the office to review video

 

[wickedsm]

ordinarilly lp would get fired for that [successful lawsuit] but its herald square so nothing will come of it.
theres numerous steps that lp has to observe to make a stop
which include
selecting the merchandise
concealing the merchandise
passing the last point of payment
obviously they didnt see those things with that lady
and then they mocked her for being Muslim?
fukk macys

 

[LezJepzin]

You were trying to pull some sort of scam. This much is obvious.

No I wasn't. It's obvious that you're a cac and oblivious to what really happened. You weren't there so

 

[ORDER_66]

name calling, instead of just answering the question? smh

Yet another person content with symbolic victories instead of practical solutions

EDIT: I guess all innocent and guilty alike will voluntarily walk to the office to review video

You already know the answer to the question. lets not be so blatantly obtuse...

The store cannot detain people in such a manner in a makeshift jailcell... if the person willingly goes with the security people to a back office where they got him on video stealing the cops will be called... and if he leaves the store the store security gives the information to the cops and let them handle it... that's what the cops is for....

Your more worried about the store instead of what the store did. what the fukk is wrong with you!?! Macy's have done this type of thing before I say again... they are in the wrong... just because a person is guilty does not subject them to the same treatment.

 

[Isaiah Bradley]

You already know the answer to the question. lets not be so blatantly obtuse...

The store cannot detain people in such a manner in a makeshift jailcell... if the person willingly goes with the security people to a back office where they got him on video stealing the cops will be called... and if he leaves the store the store security gives the information to the cops and let them handle it... that's what the cops is for....

Your more worried about the store instead of what the store did. what the fukk is wrong with you!?! Macy's have done this type of thing before I say again... they are in the wrong... just because a person is guilty does not subject them to the same treatment.

The answer to the simple question of, what's the difference between to detain and "taking a person to the back office"...is...there's no difference

Instead of being emotional with labeling me and purposely misrepresenting my point as being "worried about the store," how about you read the replies in your thread that frequently mentions the possible outcome if the accused was a "real nikka"and stop with the simplified narrative of "person willingly goes with the security people to a back office," while ignoring the many different outcomes that may happen

Prior to creating a detainment area, jailcell, back office, basement, gym etc. to hold accused shoplifters while "reviewing the tape,"

-how often was checking the tape done in a day?,
-how many employees is involved with holding the accused and checking the tape?,
-how often did physical altercations occurred, while employees are involved with holding the accused and checking the tape?,
-how often has the police closed a shoplifting case by both catching the perpetrator and getting the goods back?
-how much does it cost a business if the police doesn't close such a case?,
-how much resources will the police "use" in searching for shoplifters?

These are the basic questions that I think about after I justified if there's a deserved penalty for discrimination and profiling by Macy's. I want a practical solution, not a symbolic victory

Removing the ability for a business to detain a perpetrator to "review the tapes" and the chance to retrieve stolen goods/value, only benefits the shoplifters. The more lost that a business takes, only the customers and the employees will feel the repercussions

 

[ORDER_66]

The answer to the simple question of, what's the difference between to detain and "taking a person to the back office"...is...there's no difference

Instead of being emotional with labeling me and purposely misrepresenting my point as being "worried about the store," how about you read the replies in your thread that frequently mentions the possible outcome if the accused was a "real nikka"and stop with the simplified narrative of "person willingly goes with the security people to a back office," while ignoring the many different outcomes that may happen

Prior to creating a detainment area, jailcell, back office, basement, gym etc. to hold accused shoplifters while "reviewing the tape,"

-how often was checking the tape done in a day?,
-how many employees is involved with holding the accused and checking the tape?,
-how often did physical altercations occurred, while employees are involved with holding the accused and checking the tape?,
-how often has the police closed a shoplifting case by both catching the perpetrator and getting the goods back?
-how much does it cost a business if the police doesn't close such a case?,
-how much resources will the police "use" in searching for shoplifters?

These are the basic questions that I think about after I justified if there's a deserved penalty for discrimination and profiling by Macy's. I want a practical solution, not a symbolic victory

Removing the ability for a business to detain a perpetrator to "review the tapes" and the chance to retrieve stolen goods/value, only benefits the shoplifters. The more lost that a business takes, only the customers and the employees will feel the repercussions

 

[blackzeus]

Grab me by the arm for no legitimate reason and we're throwing hands

Touch me on some "let's go to the basement" sh*t and you gon' be rockin' nubs

 

[Isaiah Bradley]

lol. they always expose themselves with a little pressure

 

[stepbackj34spud]

We profiled soon as we step in there. I go to the sneaker section don't no one wants to help me. dont none of them say shyt either. I be waiting for them to come and ask me do I need help and follow me around.

Bro I was in a duane reade in manhattan the other day and some c00n ass dread head decided to follow me around in the store. Mad cacs in the store shopping with no problem but this dude decided to come into the aisle i was in to "fix" things. shyt pissed me off, I wanted to slap him.. I hate that racial profiling shyt.