Game designers say the PS5 has the best architecture than any console in history.

[Koba St]

PlayStation 5 event confirmed: What to expect from the June 4 showcase

What we know about the PS5 so far is what’s inside the system and a few other details. Like Xbox Series X, PS5 features AMD hardware. This includes a Zen 2 CPU and a Navi GPU. The console also has a super-fast PCIe 4.0 SSD and a data-transfer architecture to match. But the acronyms and initialisms don’t really matter. What you need to know is that PS5 has significant more GPU power and a massive leap in CPU and data throughput compared to the current generation.

On top of all that, developers and publishers continue to praise the design of the PS5. Some have told GamesBeat that it is has a better architecture than any console in history. So studios may find it a joy to work with.

Can’t wait to get my hands on this console

 

[Bryan Danielson]

They lying

 

[MeachTheMonster]

Who said that?

 

[ALonelyDad]

Who said that?

game designers

 

[MeachTheMonster]

game designers

Which ones?

 

[old pig]

Who said that?

game designers

 

[ALonelyDad]

Which ones?

These are the 15 I know so far who have admitted it

 

[MeachTheMonster]

These are the 15 I know so far who have admitted it

 

[Fanservice]

Nikkas treat console wars like politics


Casuals just need to know 3 things:

1. Unlike current gen, next gen consoles will have cpu’s that aren’t trash

2. The “gap” between ps5 and Xbox series x is smaller than PS4 pro vs. Xbone X

3. The PS5 is using faster and more future-proof ssd technology that will shine in PS5 exclusives and a select few third-party games

 

[iceberg_is_on_fire]

Who said that?

Sycophants.

The only thing that I can think of is that Sony allows more of a coding to the metal than Microsoft does. However, one company is a hardware rooted company that sells some software and one is a software rooted company that sells some hardware. Not to mention, this isn't just any software company, it's the world's preeminent software company. I have no doubt that Sony has put together some good stuff but unless you are Apple, Amazon or Google, companies with real money to create a comparable competitor in development tools. It's all subjective. It's good PR.

 

[MeachTheMonster]

Sycophants.

The only thing that I can think of is that Sony allows more of a coding to the metal than Microsoft does. However, one company is a hardware rooted company that sells some software and one is a software rooted company that sells some hardware. Not to mention, this isn't just any software company, it's the world's preeminent software company. I have no doubt that Sony has put together some good stuff but unless you are Apple, Amazon or Google, companies with real money to create a comparable competitor in development tools. It's all subjective. It's good PR.

My thing is fanboys like @J.V Koba keep talking about what “devs” have said. But when you actually ask for which devs actually said it. You get bullshyt like what @ALonelyDad posted.


I’m all for tech talk from actual devs. Just waiting for some of that to actually happen

 

[The Mad Titan]

Who said that?

"They"

 

[gtj1982]

 

[ALonelyDad]

My thing is fanboys like @J.V Koba keep talking about what “devs” have said. But when you actually ask for which devs actually said it. You get bullshyt like what @ALonelyDad posted.


I’m all for tech talk from actual devs. Just waiting for some of that to actually happen

How are we supposed to give you names when the article does not have names? The devs want to speak anonymously, if you have any issues you can take this with a writer and call him out on his credibility

 

[MeachTheMonster]

How are we supposed to give you names when the article does not have names? The devs want to speak anonymously, if you have any issues you can take this with a writer and call him out on his credibility

If we agree the writer had no credibility, why we talking about this “story” here?