Gaming PC for November 2014 - $401.91

[nyknick]

400 posts about temperatures, VRAM, frame rates, pixels, SLI and it is all understandable.


What I can't understand and my mind cannot comprehend is why anyone would want to play Assassin's Creed Going through all that trouble just so you can climb a tower and jump into hay

 

[Ciggavelli]

400 posts about temperatures, VRAM, frame rates, pixels, SLI and it is all understandable.


What I can't understand and my mind cannot comprehend is why anyone would want to play Assassin's Creed Going through all that trouble just so you can climb a tower and jump into hay

shyt's fun breh. AC:BF was my first one, so ACU is still new to me. shyt is still broken though, even with patch 3. Maybe patch 4 will fix things... Maybe (I'm not keeping my hopes up).

 

[Fatboi1]

It's even flabber than I thought, look at my new score with programs closed down

And this is with outdated cards

Just did it again. This time I overclocked the GPu a lil bit and raised the power limit in MSI afterburner as well as using gamebooster to stop temporary services for a little boost. Seems much better .

I also updated my drivers to the latest beta.

 

[Ciggavelli]

Just did it again. This time I overclocked the GPu a lil bit and raised the power limit in MSI afterburner as well as using gamebooster to stop temporary services for a little boost. Seems much better .

I also updated my drivers to the latest beta.

I'm just more than tripling your shyt, no big deal


But on the real, if you didn't see any artifacts during a burn in test, I'm sure your shyt is fine. As you can see, furmark raises temps quick as shyt. AMD even recommends not using it I was reading. They think it's too taxing on the card. So be careful with stress testing.

shyt, even the program warns you. shyt's crazy.

 

[daze23]

Go back in the thread and look at what you said about my card and why it touched 83 and jumped down to 82. I said it was it was cuz of fans. You said because of throttling. You then tried to explain to me the difference between clock speeds and gpu usage for some strange reason, as if I didn't know the difference.

It's okay to admit when you are wrong. You were just trying to start shyt, like I said earlier in this thread. You were just trying to jump on 2gunsup bandwagon. He at least backed down. You kept pushing. Turns out you were wrong.

I already congratulated liquid multiple times on his new build. People can admit when they're wrong. It's not that hard

http://www.anandtech.com/show/7492/the-geforce-gtx-780-ti-review/15

As we mentioned in our look at the GTX 780 Ti hardware, NVIDIA has increased their default temperature throttle point from 80C on the GTX Titan/780 to 83C on the GTX 780 Ti. The end result is that in all of our temperature limited tests the GTX 780 Ti will peak at 83C-84C, whereas the older GK110 cards will peak at 80C-81C.

and you really want to keep the card even cooler than that so you can take advantage of the full 'boost' speed

 

[Ciggavelli]

http://www.anandtech.com/show/7492/the-geforce-gtx-780-ti-review/15



and you really want to keep the card even cooler than that so you can take advantage of the full 'boost' speed

Lol, I already showed you the graph that said this exact same thing. What are you trying to prove here? You've provided nothing new. You were wrong, my shyt wasn't throttling. I don't have a stock card. My shyt didn't even throttle at 86c. My default throttle point is actually higher than the reference cards. I dunno what that point is, but I don't wanna find out. I'm happy keeping my shyt at 82-83

I guess you just can't admit that you're wrong. It's hard for some. Some of us are bigger men than others

My temps are even better than that site you pulled up. I never got higher than 86 with furmark. With reference cards you get to 88 in sli

My cards are performing perfectly normal, with better temps than reference cards even. Sorry

Here's my proof too

 

[daze23]

Lol, I already showed you the graph that said this exact same thing. What are you trying to prove here? You've provided nothing new. You were wrong, my shyt wasn't throttling. I don't have a stock card. My shyt didn't even throttle at 86c. My default throttle point is actually higher than the reference cards. I dunno what that point is, but I don't wanna find out. I'm happy keeping my shyt at 82-83

I guess you just can't admit that you're wrong. It's hard for some. Some of us are bigger men than others

My temps are even better than that site you pulled up. I never got higher than 86 with furmark. With reference cards you get to 88 in sli

My cards are performing perfectly normal, with better temps than reference cards even. Sorry

Here's my proof too

in an SLI setup the temps are gonna be slightly hotter because there's an outside heat source. and look how lopsided your temps are. one gpu is at 70c, but gets no boost because it's synced with a gpu at the throttle point. dat non-reference SLI

and we know you're not "happy keeping my shyt at 82-83", because you've thrown PC gaming in the bushes while you wait on 8gb gpu's

 

[Ciggavelli]

in an SLI setup the temps are gonna be slightly hotter because there's an outside heat source. and look how lopsided your temps are. one gpu is at 70c, but gets no boost because it's synced with a gpu at the throttle point. dat non-reference SLI

and we know you're not "happy keeping my shyt at 82-83", because you've thrown PC gaming in the bushes while you wait on 8gb gpu's

You can't admit you're wrong. Pathetic.

I'm happy with my temps, I'm not happy with my vram and broken games. Haven't you read this fukking thread?

Oh course my temps are lopsided. That happens in sli. It happened with my 690 too. There's a fukking hot ass gpu right above the other one. What do you think they're gonna be the same temp?
I don't have liquid cooled gpus (although I wish I did )

and my core is higher than reference boost. Higher than the boost! THe fukk are you talking about? (http://www.nvidia.com/gtx-700-graphics-cards/gtx-780ti/)

Man, this shyt is hilarious.

 

[LeVraiPapi]

Nvidia for life or nothing at all brehs


I wanna upgrade my pc but I still can't see the point because I still get 1080p 60 fps. AT that note, I m more than good. That's without OC

 

[Fatboi1]

I think I'm gonna switch back to my g3258. I honestly can't see a big difference in games and that money could be spent elsewhere. The only game that played better was watchdogs and that wasn't by much and everything else is pretty much gpu heavy. It felt like i spent $145 for bragging rights.

 

[Ciggavelli]

I think I'm gonna switch back to my g3258. I honestly can't see a big difference in games and that money could be spent elsewhere. The only game that played better was watchdogs and that wasn't by much and everything else is pretty much gpu heavy. It felt like i spent $145 for bragging rights.

Crysis 3 should play better. Skyrim too. Plus new games like those cores

 

[Fatboi1]

Crysis 3 should play better. Skyrim too. Plus new games like those cores

I don't play Crysis 3 anymore as I beat it on a FX4100 and GTX 550 Ti years ago.

Skyrim with all the enabled mods runs at 1080p/60fps for me even with the G3258. It's no point in me having more expensive CPU just to play a future game. I think I'll recop it when Batman comes out. For now there's nothing on the horizon that I'm buying on PC and what I already have plays perfectly fine. BF4 again another game that plays perfectly fine at on my pentium.

 

[daze23]

You can't admit you're wrong. Pathetic.

I'm happy with my temps, I'm not happy with my vram and broken games. Haven't you read this fukking thread?

Oh course my temps are lopsided. That happens in sli. It happened with my 690 too. There's a fukking hot ass gpu right above the other one. What do you think they're gonna be the same temp?
I don't have liquid cooled gpus (although I wish I did )

and my core is higher than reference boost. Higher than the boost! THe fukk are you talking about? (http://www.nvidia.com/gtx-700-graphics-cards/gtx-780ti/)

Man, this shyt is hilarious.

your temps are even more lopsided because you have one gpu actively blowing hot air on the other. they're not just passively affecting each other's temp

I have a gtx 780. the reference base clock is 863MHz with a 900Mhz boost clock. my herpderpa "superclocked" card has a 967 MHZ base clock and 1020 MHz boost clock. but here's the boost I see (with no additional overclocking):

and I definitely never see my clock dip to three digits under full load. that's not because me or my card is special, but just because I use a custom fan curve

 

[Ciggavelli]

you're temps are even more lopsided because you have one gpu actively blowing hot air on the other. they're not just passively affecting each other's temp

I have a gtx 780. the reference base clock is 863MHz with a 900Mhz boost clock. my herpderpa "superclocked" card has a 967 MHZ base clock and 1020 MHz boost clock. but here's the boost I see (with no additional overclocking):

and I definitely never see my clock dip to three digits under full load. that's not because me or my card is special, but just because I use a custom fan curve

You should just give up, you're not going to win this debate Of course we have different clock speeds, we have different cards You don't even have sli.

I showed you all the numbers, I showed you what I should be getting at full load, that's what I'm getting. I'm getting better than stock 780tis at boost, on a full load, in sli, without throttling. You said I was throttling, I'm not. You're mad, you were wrong. so mad you can't even admit it.

You're just being pathetic now

 

[daze23]

keep pushing your gpu's temp to the throttle point and getting less then. it's a fixable problem (fan curve), but you're just being stubborn about it