Gavin Newsome: signed a bill that will allow victims of gun violence to sue the makers of these deadly weapons & hold them accountable

[Goat poster]

One of the few democrat playing modern politics

Republicans often do bills like this that wouldn't/shouldn't hold, at least this one is actually fighting for something good rather than culture war points

Yup

At the very least he has shown he “bout that action”

Unlike most bytch ass Democrats

 

[bourgeoisie tall freak]

Legally that would never hold

the makers of remington paid dozens of millions to sandy hook relatives. there's already laws out here that hold gun companies accountable

 

[saturn7]

you realize a person can intend to use a gun lawfully by shooting at someone presenting an immediate threat, miss and shoot a bystander instead right?

And they can be sued civilly by the victim and can possibly face criminal charges as well. How does that make the gun manufacturer at fault?

 

[RamsayBolton]

and exactly what good is this fighting for?

Riling up voters and sending a message

 

[Goat poster]

America is sick and has a problem it continues to ignore.

Almost Anything to tamper the madness is good imo

I respect Gavin

 

[Mowgli]

Can victims of knife attacks sue KitchenAid?

 

[Spectre]

They'll do everything but acknowledge the obvious

A lot of these white boys they raised are crazy as hell.

They're the real enemies of this country and America isn't ready to come to terms with that

 

[Paper Boi]

The need to blame everyone except the person who decided to use the gun unlawfully is retarded.

people who use the gun are blamed... they often go to jail if they don't suicide or suicide by cop

however good luck getting any form of compensation for the loss of your loved ones from some dead incel mass shooter

it's a good idea, even if courts will deem it illegal. Newsom's American Psycho looking ass definitely gearing up to run in 2024.

 

[bourgeoisie tall freak]

Can victims of knife attacks sue KitchenAid?

does kitchenaid put out ads like this?

 

[Doobie Doo]

you realize a person can intend to use a gun lawfully by shooting at someone presenting an immediate threat, miss and shoot a bystander instead right?

That's attempted murder or assualt with a deadly weapon.

 

[↓R↑LYB]

Remington and Bushmaster got sued by the families of the Sandy Hook victims.
Which to me is unfair. They make firearms. They didn't tell that dude to go on a murder spree. But I know the families needed someone else to blame since the killer committed suicide.

I'm confused. Are you saying that Adam Lanza, the shooter in the Sandy Hook incident, wasn't blamed for his unlawful actions?

 

[Reflected]

And they can be sued civilly by the victim and can possibly face criminal charges as well. How does that make the gun manufacturer at fault?

This has nothing to do with the person, we are beyond the reach of one branch, at a gridlock in another branch, and an impossibility for the next 10+ years in another branch. This approach is solely to put pressure on the most readily available avenue, in hopes that it will influence the money line towards distributors and D.C. lobbyists. From there one would expect a trickle down effect towards the approach of the consumers on gun laws, thus a legislative effect would follow.

But in actuality, beyond the merit of the bill, it's just another key moment for someone likely seeing the democratic nomination, which is also important.

 

[saturn7]

I'm confused. Are you saying that Adam Lanza, the shooter in the Sandy Hook incident, wasn't blamed for his unlawful actions?

He was blamed, but because he was dead the families needed to blame another party. I know they were hurt but the gun manufacturers didn't make him go on a murder spree.

 

[Goat poster]

does kitchenaid put out ads like this?

“Clear the room”

Sick nation

 

[Wildhundreds]

Can you name the instances where the person who decided to use the gun unlawfully wasn't blamed?

The Coli does it daily.