murksiderock
Superstar
This is an arbitrary criteria. It's like saying, "well this QB is Checkdown Charlie, so he ain't Top 5".Sherman not top 5. He never had the responsibility to cover the #1 WR every week.
It would be one thing if Sherman sucked covering #1's, or if he had the inability to shut down #1's. That ain't the case, though. I can do the work for you, but yall can easily YouTube his work covering #1 guys.
Was he the most dominant on #1s, no, but he had the ability to cover them and did it well more often than not. He was a dominant player in that Cover 3 they ran, and here's the thing too nikkas not saying.
Every scheme and playstyle in the NFL, from offense to defense, is generally built around the personnel. The LOB had the most dominant and talented secondary in NFL history, when you have those kinda weapons, you utilize them accordingly. I don't need to run straight up man if I got fukking Thomas and Bam Bam Kam as my safeties. It's a strategic deployment of the weapons you have, that's football, that's SCHEME.
Judging by the results the LOB put on the board, they were deployed correctly, including Sherman, who again when asked to cover the 1, generally held up, and when asked to just hold his side of the field regardless of WR, was dominant.
This hate on Sherman the player is weird, would I call him a generational corner, no, that would be Woodson, Champ, Revis. But he was fukking elite, and an All-Timer at his position, in his era.


