Secure Da Bag
Veteran
Why "home of Palestine" in quotes? That was their home. Legitimately their home. Y'all hadn't been there officially for 2000 years. That's enough time for someone to claim territory as their own.
I'm aware the situation predates WW2. Jewish migration started well before the Balfour Declaration. The First Alliyah happened in the late 1800's with mostly Russian and Yemen migrants. The Second Alliyah occurred pre-WW1/Balfour. Non of these migrants were received well by the Arabs in their "home of Palestine".


You can always seize more Palestinian land, you'll be all right![]()
Seize *back* Jewish homeland ** fixed
Of course, we all know Palestinians don't even exist![]()
The Jordanian descendants of Ottoman invaders surely exist.
Btw, what are you doing in someone else's homeland?Did the native americans invite you over?
![]()

"Superior" in one or more aspects, yes.
That sentence sounded good. But extreme poverty will create opposite extremes more times than not. And if those who are well to do are the ones emigrating, then they are not necessarily representative of the country as a whole.
Really? So where are these extremes in the Islamic world? Aside from Israel the Middle East is a despotic hellhole. Yet despite it's poverty, you will have to concede that India is a free society and is making rapid progress. It also seems to be able to produce many exceptional individuals who contribute to society at large. Meanwhile it's two Islamic "counterparts," carved out specifically to appease Muslims - Pakistan and Bangladesh - are pretty much failed states. All of these people are South Asians, there are no racial differences. What's the elephant in the room?
Jordan, Egypt, and Iran (contrary to popular belief) are not despotic hellholes.
. India is quickly becoming a society on par with China, yes. As far as exception individuals, statistics would be on your side, seeing as there are over 1 billion of you in one country, not including those outside the country. Similar to Africa being the world's breadbasket (and man, am i understating and saying that in the POLITEST AND NICEST ways), India is still the world's helpdesk. And you've been able to leverage that to your advantage.
and that local populations should be more open, because no one knows when the tables will turn.
Again, these devils did it to themselves. Why should I cape for them if they believe they are the savior to humanity? They can fix these problems themselves, instead of crying to others for help. The West is responsible for it's own demise. They should suck it up.I agree it's terrible what the West does to many of these countries. That being said, it doesn't follow that they have to put up with mass migration because of their destabilization. The West puts up with mass migration because enough of the leadership wants to. They absolutely can stop the vast majority of mass migration and should. Just like they could stop destabilizing many of these countries and should.![]()
Is this a threat? What if the majority of the native population doesn't want to be more open? Do they have that right? Apparently you think they don't, so aren't you being intolerant?
Why are you against Jews reclaiming lands they once lived in, but support Muslims taking over Europe because of colonialism?


A threat? Damn you're so sensitive
I was responding to that other breh, not talking about your "superior culture"![]()
? I didn't say you were threatening me personally. You said local populations should be more welcoming otherwise the "tables may turn." But nations that negotiate and construct policy from a position of fear and weakness are doomed to eventually fall. Agree or disagree?
HL is a safe heaven for these
types.