Just Instagram and snapchat. Pull more hoes on snapchat.
Get off and stay off Facebook (Fedbook)
If you care about privacy so much then you should know this site is unencrypted and loads hella 3rd party scripts. 
EDIT: i just looked and looks like I was wrong about the 3rd party scripts. That network log used to look like
Glad it's fixed 
EDIT: i just looked and looks like I was wrong about the 3rd party scripts. That network log used to look like
Glad it's fixed
Last edited:
WaveCapsByOscorp™
2021 Grammy Award Winner
People always forget that
Facebook, lol.
I only know of one person who's never had any social media. She bad as hell, too.
Konnan
Undisputed Jack in the Box Parking Lot Champion
No doubtIf you care about privacy so much then you should know this site is unencrypted and loads hella 3rd party scripts.
Might as well delete your account here too OP because on top of it being unencrypted the feds been done watching this site
lmfao. I didn't even check the receipts.If you care about privacy so much then you should know this site is unencrypted and loads hella 3rd party scripts.
Message boards are a primitive form of social media anyways. Complaining about FB on here is like running to the cops about the feds lol
The Devil's Advocate
Call me Dad
Here’s an easier way to live life.... not care
You already admitted you halfway care. So you already dragging yourself to pretend to care about shyt. How about you just say fukk that, if you love me, you’ll call... and live your life carefree without nonsense.
If you really care to stay plugged into the fam. Try actually seeing them and talking. If that’s too hard, then once again, you really don’t care. So why play the game
...brehs
nah they don't for sure but they can that's the point. we always assume these things are too far fetched but that's because it seems so out of bounds.
What Snowden exposed is that they were pressing these companies to hand over information and give them back door access to our everyday lives. Usually if the government has reason to surveil there should be paperwork for it. This wasn't the case. Don't be paranoid just be aware. Don't put your life all the way out here like nobody can touch you.
For heavens sake if you ever have to do some dirt do not have your phone on you or turned on. Not that i'm advising anyone on how to get away with crime just saying... be careful out here. Simple minded people get booked out here all the time just from googling shyt related to their crimes. "how to rob a bank" "where to hide a body"
clowns be all up in court with their searches logged too dumb to realize the digital trail they leave behind now they in court tryna beat a murder while caught with a body and their last search is asking where to hide the body 
. Any picture you take has a gps location on it wether you know it or not. you can even go on google and track your movements in a given time period via gps and see a trail mapped out for where you went on foot or drove for a day week month etc. all this information is logged so when they arrest a breh and go for your devices know why...
No social media here but the coli. No pics online and my birth name is also too common. So it ain't easy for the average person to pull my name up and see my whole life. I'm not gonna make it any easier for them either.
I know for sure one cheeto looking bytch in government is using Facebook to spy on the people
666 ReVeNGe 666
TROLL IS LIFE
This.
Offthegrid
All Star
Let me son your fake militant, agent, right wing troll ass quickly
He looks shook in the video because he had no idea RT aka Putin mouthpiece was gonna be there. That's him meeting the guy Putin uses to funnel money into western companies
How many times do I need to son your dumb ass before you learn not to go against me ?
An article that goes on to say that the 2016 U.S. election was influenced by Russia and yet no evidence has come forth of this. None of what you posted says "Russia runs or owns Facebook" How do you even expect someone to take your source serious with shyt. Notice the articles are written a year after the elections and MSM tried so hard to tie Russia to U.S. elections and continued to fail.
Now my sources go back way back to exploit shyt ....
Gainspan Corporation manufactures low power Wi-Fi semiconductors that form the heart of modern remote sensing, monitoring and control technologies.
Recorded Future Inc. is a Massachusetts web startup that monitors the web in real time and claims its media analytics search engine can be used to predict the future.
Keyhole Corp. created the 3D earth visualization technology that became the core of Google Earth.
The common denominator? All of these companies, and hundreds more cutting edge technology and software startups, have received seed money and investment funding from In-Q-Tel, the CIA’s own venture capital firm.
Welcome, this is James Corbett of The Corbett Report with your Eyeopener Report for BoilingFrogsPost.com
For decades, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or DARPA, has been the American governmental body tasked with conducting high-risk, high-payoff research into cutting edge science and technology. Responsible most famously for developing the world’s first operational packet switching network that eventually became the core of the Internet, DARPA tends togarner headlines these days for some of its more outlandish research proposals and is generally looked upon a a blue-sky research agency whose endeavours only occasionally bear fruit.
In the post-9/11 consolidation of the American intelligence community, IARPA, or the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Agency, was created to serve as the spymaster’s equivalent of DARPA’s defense research.
In contrast to this, In-Q-Tel was formed by the CIA in 1999 as a private, not-for-profit venture capital firm with the specific task of delivering technology to America’s intelligence community.
Publicly, In-Q-Tel markets itself as an innovative way to leverage the power of the private sector by identifying key emerging technologies and providing companies with the funding to bring those technologies to market.
In reality, however, what In-Q-Tel represents is a dangerous blurring of the lines between the public and private sectors in a way that makes it difficult to tell where the American intelligence community ends and the IT sector begins.
In-Q-Tel has generated a number of stories since its inception based on what can only be described as the “creepiness” factor of its investments in overtly Orwellian technologies.
In 2004, KMWorld published an interview with Greg Pepus, then In-Q-Tel’s senior director of federal and intelligence community strategy, about some of their investments. Pepus was especially proud of the CIA’s investment in Inxight, a company that offered software for data mining unstructured data sources like blogs and websites with analytical processing.
In 2006 it was revealed that AT&T had provided NSA eavesdroppers full access to its customer’s internet traffic, and that the American intelligence community was illegally scooping up reams of internet data wholesale. The data mining equipment installed in the NSA back door, a Narus STA 6400, was developed by a company whose partners were funded by In-Q-Tel.
Also in 2006, News21 reported on an In-Q-Tel investment in CallMiner, a company developing technology for turning recorded telephone conversations into searchable databases. In late 2005it was revealed that the NSA had been engaged in an illegal warrantless wiretapping program since at least the time of the 9/11 attacks, monitoring the private domestic phone calls of American citizens in breach of their fourth amendment rights.
In 2009, the Telegraph reported on In-Q-Tel’s investment in Visible Technologies, a companyspecializing in software that monitors what people are saying on social media websites like YouTube, Twitter, Flickr and Amazon. The software is capable of real-time communications tracking, trend monitoring, and even sentiment analysis that categorizes blog posts and comments as positive, negative or neutral. Just last month, the Federal Reserve tendered aRequest For Proposal for just this type of software so the privately owned central bank could monitor what people are saying about it online.
Two of the names that come up most often in connection with In-Q-Tel, however, need no introduction: Google and Facebook.
The publicly available record on the Facebook/In-Q-Tel connection is tenuous. Facebookreceived $12.7 million in venture capital from Accel, whose manager, James Breyer, now sits on their board. He was formerly the chairman of the National Venture Capital Association, whose board included Gilman Louie, then the CEO of In-Q-Tel. The connection is indirect, but the suggestion of CIA involvement with Facebook, however tangential, is disturbing in the light of Facebook’s history of violating the privacy of its users.
Google’s connection to In-Q-Tel is more straightforward, if officially denied. In 2006, ex-CIA officer Robert David Steele told Homeland Security Today that Google “has been taking money and direction for elements of the US Intelligence Community, including the Office of Research and Development at the Central Intelligence Agency, In-Q-Tel, and in all probability, both the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Army’s Intelligence and Security Command.” Later that year, a blogger claimed that an official Google spokesman had denied the claims, but no official press statement was released.
Steele’s accusation is not the only suggestion of American intelligence involvement with Google, however.
In 2005, In-Q-Tel sold over 5,000 shares of Google stock. The shares are widely presumed to have come from In-Q-Tel’s investment in Keyhole Inc., which was subsequently bought out by Google, but this is uncertain.
In 2010, it was announced that Google was working directly with the National Security Agency to secure its electronic assets.
Also in 2010, Wired reported that In-Q-Tel and Google had jointly provided venture capital funding to Recorded Future Inc., a temporal analytics search engine company that analyzes tens of thousands of web sources to predict trends and events.
But as potentially alarming as In-Q-Tel’s connections to internet giants like Facebook and Google are, and as disturbing as its interest in data mining technologies may be, the CIA’s venture capital arm is interested in more than just web traffic monitoring.
The In-Q-Tel website currently lists two “practice areas,” “Information and Communication Technologies” and “Physical and Biological Technologies.” The latter field consists of “capabilities of interest” such as “The on-site determination of individual human traits for IC purposes” and “Tracking and/or authentication of both individuals and objects.” In-Q-Tel also lists two areas that are “on its radar” when it comes to biotech: Nano-bio Convergence andPhysiological Intelligence. Detailed breakdowns of each area explain that the intelligence community is interested in, amongst other things, self-assembling batteries, single molecule detectors, targeted drug delivery platforms, and sensors that can tell where a person has been and what substances he has been handling from “biomarkers” like trace compounds in the breath or samples of skin.
In the years since its formation, many have been led to speculate about In-Q-Tel and its investments, but what requires no speculation is an understanding that a privately owned venture capital firm, created by and for the CIA, in which well-connected board members drawn from the private sector can then profit from the investments made with CIA funds that itself come from the taxpayer represent an erosion of the barrier between the public and private spheres that should give even the most credulous pause for thought.
What does it mean that emerging technology companies are becoming wedded to the CIA as soon as their technology shows promise?
What can be the public benefit in fostering and encouraging technologies which can be deployed for spying on all internet users, including American citizens, in direct contravention of the CIA’s own prohibitions against operating domestically?
If new software and technology is being brought to market by companies with In-Q-Tel advisors on their boards, what faith can anyone purchasing American technologies have that their software and hardware is not designed with CIA backdoors to help the American intelligence community achieve its vision of “Total Information Awareness”?
Rather than scrutinizing each individual investment that In-Q-Tel makes, perhaps an institutional approach is required.
At this point, the American people have to ask themselves whether they want the CIA, an agency that has participated in the overthrow of foreign, democratically-elected governments, an agency that has implanted fake stories in the news media to justify American war interests, an agency that at this very moment is engaged in offensive drone strikes, killing suspected “insurgents” and civilians alike in numerous theaters around the world, should be entrusted with developing such close relationships with the IT sector, or whether In-Q-Tel should be scrapped for good.
Another article...
Facebook - the CIA conspiracy
Another one...
http://wallstreetonparade.com/2014/07/facebook’s-experiment-and-its-cia-roots/
If they did it with google what makes you think they wouldn't for facebook?
https://www.wired.com/2010/07/exclusive-google-cia/