GIL SCOTT-CRACK: “I’M NOT SURE HOW MJ WOULD HAVE MORE OFFENSIVE IMPACT IN THIS ERA THAN STEPH.”

[Truefan31]

if you ignore all the context and think basketball is a game of 1on1, then sure.

you mean the unanimous mvp, up 3-1 in the series, couldn’t finish the job?

 

[Consumed]

you mean the unanimous mvp, up 3-1 in the series, couldn’t finish the job?

did Curry win unanimous mvp before or after he sprained his mcl and missed two weeks in the middle of the postseason.

you're also ignoring - the Draymond suspension in a home game 5 that swung the momentum of the series, the bogut injury that made the Warriors rely on worse reserves (both Festus and Andy V were horrible in G7), Iguodala's back injury.

The Warriors lost a 3-1 lead in large part because of a series of events that went against their favor, and the Cavaliers to their credit capitalizing on every single one of them.

 

[Truefan31]

did Curry win unanimous mvp before or after he sprained his mcl and missed two weeks in the middle of the postseason.

you're also ignoring - the Draymond suspension in a home game 5 that swung the momentum of the series, the bogut injury that made the Warriors rely on worse reserves (both Festus and Andy V were horrible in G7), Iguodala's back injury.

The Warriors lost a 3-1 lead in large part because of a series of events that went against their favor, and the Cavaliers to their credit capitalizing on every single one of them.

Breh he claimed he was back, talkin that shyt when he came back. No excuses.



He came up small, it’s that simple. Win 73 games means nothing if you don’t close the deal. And as their supposed offensive anchor he didn’t get it done.

it’s why they begged kd to join them. If it was just a bunch of coincidences they prolly don’t beg kd to come there.

32 times in nba finals a team was up 3-1 and they closed the deal. Up until those warriors. So it’s the BIGGEST CHOKEJOB IN NBA FINALS HISTORY.

 

[ISO]

FoRcE hIm LeFt

 

[Consumed]

Breh he claimed he was back, talkin that shyt when he came back. No excuses.

He came up small, it’s that simple. Win 73 games means nothing if you don’t close the deal. And as their supposed offensive anchor he didn’t get it done.

it’s why they begged kd to join them. If it was just a bunch of coincidences they prolly don’t beg kd to come there.

32 times in nba finals a team was up 3-1 and they closed the deal. Up until those warriors. So it’s the BIGGEST CHOKEJOB IN NBA FINALS HISTORY.

He was back...from injury. That doesn't mean he was his pre injury self. Kerr admitted that he had to alter the Warriors offense because of Curry's limitations. You should've observed Curry shoot terribly up until the OT period of that game, and that he was cold to start the following game. His consistency was shot.

It's Kevin Durant dude. What do you even mean. It was an unprecedented situation with the salary cap blowing up for every team in the league and KD just so happening to be on the market at the time. They'd be stupid to not go after him.

Of those 32 times, when were these conditions met after going up 3-1: a player of Draymond's caliber (best player in the series for GSW at the time) being suspended for the following game, one of their best defenders/absolutely best traditionally center knocked out of the series, best wing defender is limited due to injury to close the series, best offensive player is coming off a knee sprain mid postseason. Teams that go up 3-1 usually don't suffer from misfortune soon afterwards.

This says nothing to how good the Cavaliers were, and how great LeBron can be in do or die scenarios.

 

[Jalether]

THIS IS LITERALLY THE PLAY HE IS MOST KNOWN FOR

KEEP JUELZIN N CONVINCING YASELF U SPITTIN KNOWLEDGE THO

I C U

Actually it depends who you ask, curry haters such as yourself will point to that play and the one against kyrie as his defining moment to disparage him
while real basketball fans that enjoy and appreciate the game will point to these two plays as his most memorable ones

 

[Truefan31]

He was back...from injury. That doesn't mean he was his pre injury self. Kerr admitted that he had to alter the Warriors offense because of Curry's limitations. You should've observed Curry shoot terribly up until the OT period of that game, and that he was cold to start the following game. His consistency was shot.

It's Kevin Durant dude. What do you even mean. It was an unprecedented situation with the salary cap blowing up for every team in the league and KD just so happening to be on the market at the time. They'd be stupid to not go after him.

Of those 32 times, when were these conditions met after going up 3-1: a player of Draymond's caliber (best player in the series for GSW at the time) being suspended for the following game, one of their best defenders/absolutely best traditionally center knocked out of the series, best wing defender is limited due to injury to close the series, best offensive player is coming off a knee sprain mid postseason. Teams that go up 3-1 usually don't suffer from misfortune soon afterwards.

This says nothing to how good the Cavaliers were, and how great LeBron can be in do or die scenarios.

breh they were on the phone in the parking lot begging kd.

In nba finals history a team up 3-1 has won 32/33 times. The 2016 warriors are the only team to lose. So it’s THE BIGGEST CHOKEJOB IN NBA FINALS HISTORY.

 

[seemorecizzy]

did Curry win unanimous mvp before or after he sprained his mcl and missed two weeks in the middle of the postseason.

you're also ignoring - the Draymond suspension in a home game 5 that swung the momentum of the series, the bogut injury that made the Warriors rely on worse reserves (both Festus and Andy V were horrible in G7), Iguodala's back injury.

The Warriors lost a 3-1 lead in large part because of a series of events that went against their favor, and the Cavaliers to their credit capitalizing on every single one of them.

i dont agree with any of this shyt
but if you are a consistent human being, you will acknowledge that golden state wouldnt of won the previous year considering the fact that kyrie and love were out for da whole series.

since you are hanging on to andre bogut being hurt and draymond one game..lol
so regardless, its still 1 ring to 1 ring

 

[Consumed]

breh they were on the phone in the parking lot begging kd.

In nba finals history a team up 3-1 has won 32/33 times. The 2016 warriors are the only team to lose. So it’s THE BIGGEST CHOKEJOB IN NBA FINALS HISTORY.

by they you mean draymond. and I'm still not seeing what's wrong with recruiting a top five player, top 30 all time to join your team when the cap space was there to make it happen.

Which of those 32 teams dealt with circumstances like the Warriors. You are trivializing the series result by calling it a chokejob. Injuries are not choking. Suspensions are not choking.

 

[Consumed]

i dont agree with any of this shyt
but if you are a consistent human being, you will acknowledge that golden state wouldnt of won the previous year considering the fact that kyrie and love were out for da whole series.

since you are hanging on to andre bogut being hurt and draymond one game..lol

I will acknowledge that the Warriors benefited from fortunate circumstances in 2015. Then the Cavs did in 2016. I'm consistent with that. You need a lot of shyt to break your way to win a title.

 

[Sccit]

Lol. Secret Kobe slurping.

Name the handful of players that were on MJ’s level that we don’t give credit due to marketing.

KOBE KAREEM MAGIC OFF TOP

 

[Sccit]

How is this possible when the only thing he arguably did better was shoot the 3? And Kobe gets all kinds of credit for what he did, it's just that nobody calls him better than Jordan, and 99% of basketball fans never will. It's not some marketing ploy, people actually got to watch him play, same with Kobe. Kobe absolutely gets the credit he deserves, and If that's not getting enough credit then I guess he never will.

KOBE WAS A BETTER SHOOTER IN GENERAL.. HE ALSO HAD BETTER HANDLE, FOOTWORK, MORE COUNTERS, ABILITY TO HIT DIFFICULT SHOTS. THIS BEEN KNOWN.

 

[Sccit]

Bron stans are in love with the most obscure stats.
Kobe stans are oblivious to the most obvious ones.

Kobe averaged less than 20 ppg 5 times in his career. Even at 40 Jordan never did that.

Jordan's scoring increased during the playoffs and finals. Kobe's stayed the same.

10 scoring titles > 2

50 point games
Jordan 31 (14+ years in the league)
Kobe 25 (20 years in the league)

PEAK FOR PEAK, KOBE WAS BETTER... U AINT SLICK BRINGIN UP KOBE’S LOWS IN THIS.

 

[Osmosis]

Force Lebron left



He's as good at finishing with his left as he is his right

 

[YoungMoneyCashMoneyBoy]

PEAK FOR PEAK, KOBE WAS BETTER... U AINT SLICK BRINGIN UP KOBE’S LOWS IN THIS.

You're free to post both of their peak stats for comparison.

There is nothing slick about facts.

40 year old, flabby Mike never put up numbers as bad as kobe did 5 times in his career.

Played 20 years and got 2 scoring titles