Who was the 1st option with Shaq n Kobe they 3 peat seasons? What was they shot attempts?
Gilbert Arenas' Basketball Opinions Thread
- Thread starter Alexander The Great
- Start date
JUST LIKE WADE N LEBRON, IT WAS 1A AND 1B...THATS MY POINT.
LEBRON DOESNT HAVE A YEAR WHERE HE WAS THE CLEAR CUT ALPHA DOG ALA KOBE IN '09 AND '10.....AND HE MOST LIKELY NEVER WILL.
LOL@the first 4 responses just being on some OTHER $hit
Did you watch the Lakers during that run? It was always about pounding the ball to Shaq so they could get easy victories..that's where everyone shytted on Kobe because he was taking wild selfish shots instead of going through Shaq like it was designed to go. He was getting TORN ASUNDER on commentary on TNT and ESPN.
Broke Wave
The GOAT
The Finals is one series though... How does that really define his career breh. Kobes stats in the 10 and 04 finals dont define his career or characterize him.
Taking the most shots on your team makes you the first option on offense... But that doesnt mean youre not a first option, u feel me?
Was Shaq not the finals mvp all those years and Bron his years? Seems clear cut to me
WuDatWuDat
All Star
He's not wrong
IT'S NOT JUST ONE SERIES, THIS IS A TREND WITH LEBRON...HE NEEDS ANOTHER ALPHA DOG ON HIS TEAM TO SUCCEED AND THATS THE BOTTOM LINE.
nikkas took more shots than Magic, but he was the man on that team
Was Shaq not the finals mvp all those years and Bron his years? Seems clear cut to me
YEA SHAQ HAD SENIORITY ON THOSE TEAMS...KOBE WAS 20-22.
IN ESSENCE, KOBE WAS 1B IN THE THREEPEAT ERA, WHILE WADE WAS 1B IN MIAMI'S BACK TO BACK...BUT IT'S STILL 1A AND 1B. U THINK PIPPEN WAS A 1B OR A CLEAR-CUT 2? THATS THE POINT. GILBERT SAYIN LEBRON CANT WIN WIT A CLEAR-CUT 2.
sportscribe
Superstar
The reasoning behind the article is confused and inconsistent. So I guess it stands to reason that it makes sense to you.
He says LeBron would be greater if he was "more selfish", but in the same breath states that his legacy is based on "winning". Should LeBron trade in his chamionship trophies so he can become the top scorer in the league?
He wants LeBron to have a season similar to 2005-06 Kobe (where the Lakers got knocked out in the first round of the playoffs). Do you see where both you and the author of the article are confused? We are talking about someone with 2 rings and and 4 MVPs. Should he have deferred to lesser players so he can average 35 points a game? Firstly how do you even defer to lesser players and average more points per game? Both you and the article are dumb.
Sooo Wade n Bron came in tbe league together, Wade older but they just gave Bron the seniority is what your saying?
The reasoning behind the article is confused and inconsistent. So I guess it stands to reason that it makes sense to you.
He says LeBron would be greater if he was "more selfish", but in the same breath states that his legacy is based on "winning". Should LeBron trade in his chamionship trophies so he can become the top scorer in the league?
He wants LeBron to have a season similar to 2005-06 Kobe (where the Lakers got knocked out in the first round of the playoffs). Do you see where both you and the author of the article are confused? We are talking about someone with 2 rings and and 4 MVPs. Should he have deferred to lesser players so he can average 35 points a game? Firstly how do you even defer to lesser players and average more points per game? Both you and the article are dumb.
WHEN HE SAYS THAT IF HE WAS MORE SELFISH, HE'D BE "GREATER" AND THAT IT'S "SAD THAT WE'LL NEVER SEE WHAT HE COULDA BEEN", WHAT DOES THAT MEAN TO U?
YES BECAUSE LEBRON WAS IN HIS PRIME, WHILE WADE WAS FALLIN OUT OF HIS...SIMPLE SCIENCE
OG_StankBrefs
Da Spice...
And none of dat is gonna change da fact you're a garbage ass poster and a shytty wannabe "rapper" from da burbs.
