Isn't it funny you referenced, used Central Africa, for its poorly done research - the same Central Africa that's the most exploited region in Africa due to its vast resources, from the Portuguese, to the Spanish, to the Brits, to the French, to the Germans, to the Dutch, and Belgians. A region where exploitation has been going on for over 400 years; a region where the Portuguese and Dutch armies were station for decades in the 1600s and 1700s, in their brutal wars with Kongo Kingdom. How shocking that there are 'Yellow People' there! Absolutely shocking, isn't it?
Also, excerpts from the same article (paragraphs 5, 7 & 8):
Err, so how come the cac who wrote the article believes that these 'Yellow men' are more 'dignified'/'handsomer' than 'blacks', and go on to say that they're 'technologically superior' (which means smarter) since he said they weren't from a separate group and are just an anomaly within different African tribes? And how can they be 'superior' if they share the same genotype with the other groups and the anomaly is in the phenotype? Anyone with a brain would see the racist agenda here, despite the idiotic effort to mask with it pseudo-intellectualism and half-baked research.
The writer also went on to say this in the last paragraph:
After paragraphs full of poor research, pure conjectures, and racist statements that contradict the writer's beliefs - the writer further contradicted himself on the last paragraph, by alluding to the successive migration into Africa, from the Nile valley region (which is true). A region where admixture between whites and blacks have been going for over 4,000 years and the region which birther the Arabs, who're mostly an admixture of white and black people. There are just too many holes in the junk article you posted as a rebuttal and I doubt you read it, before posting it.
So, if I may ask: what's your level of education because I don't believe anyone who has done dissertation, which is mostly about critical analysis would post a rubbish article like this one that contradicts itself, from paragraph to paragraph?