The buyer does not always determine the value. That is more hypocritical nonsense and ignorant of how the world operates today.
Basically. There's theory and then their's actuality. In theory we should allow the supply demand curve to plop wages at around what 3 bucks? two full time parents with let's say 1 kid are then left with ($3x40 hr/s per week x 52weeks x 2earners) $12,480.00 a year to live off of. Hell let's even allow both parents another part time job with 20 additional hours that'd bring the family income up to $18,720.00 a year.
The traditional model then says as the cost of production goes down so too then would the price of the product...can you think of anything you've seen in the news lately regarding a drop in cost that should garner a significant drop in products? (hint it's gas). Bread still cost the same around here, as does everything else. Guess who's eating all that saved cost, it sure as fuk isn't the consumer. But let's continue down the "lower minimum wages" road. Eventually shyt stops selling because people can't afford it, EVENTUALLY. Eventually prices SHOULD fall, again eventually.
The problem is that during that "eventually" time frame the economy goes to shyt, and the upheaval on our economic system would likely be devastating.
We have a consumer based economy, the more we cut the legs out from under the "consumer" the worse off we are.