Google in shambles over OpenAI and ChatGPT. The AI wars have now begun.

humminbird

Veteran
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
45,024
Reputation
9,266
Daps
185,654
Told my cousin about it to assist him with writing essays for college. Told this fool not to tell nobody about and utilize it before it gets mad mainstream. Fool went ahead and told his classmates who will eventually tell someone else and so forth.:beli:

Not only will they charge soon but they'll prolly patch it so much it don't even have the same effectiveness. Apparently the first version could give how tos on hacking top notch security systems and govt databases and shyt. Mofos better enjoy it while it lasts.:francis:
there's a $20 a month one coming soon
 

MoshpitMazi

Moshpit Gxng/ Anti Fash
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
9,421
Reputation
791
Daps
21,962
Reppin
Stone Mountain GA
You’re communicating with evil. Like a digital ouij board. Stop it and repent and place your trust in Christ(Yahusha aka Jesus) and the Father(Yahuah aka God). Believe in the finished work of his sacrifice on the cross.
fukk that bullshi u peddling


Don't quote back unless you want me to be on some hood nikka behavior
 

IIVI

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
13,708
Reputation
3,529
Daps
48,916
Reppin
Los Angeles
That's not a good thing. Last thing I want is rampant A.I. making massive decisions with global economic ramifications with NO human beings with the nuance to legislate it.

Just because we CAN doesn't me we always SHOULD.
The problem is we've had the option to stop going forward with this.

We've had the opportunity time after time to stop supporting leaders going down this route.

It's time to stop blaming scientists, CEO's, politicians, etc. and start owning up that we're enabling these things.

When somebody looks like a total P.O.S, we elect them. When that P.O.S politician gives the CEO of a company the green light for A.I to replace a section of workers, well, people voted for that rather than the person that'll fight against it.
 
Last edited:

Black Magisterialness

Moderna Boi
Supporter
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
19,601
Reputation
4,125
Daps
47,126
The problem is we've had the option to stop going forward with this.

We've had the opportunity time after time to stop supporting leaders going down this route.

It's time to stop blaming scientists, CEO's, politicians, etc. and start owning up that we're enabling these things.

When somebody looks like a total P.O.S, we elect them. When that P.O.S politician gives the CEO of a company the green light for A.I to replace a section of workers, well, people voted for that rather than the person that'll fight against it.

The government doesn't mandate that AI be created. The driving force of innovation hasn't been the government for years. This is all on the Tech Industry (and the de-regulation of it, so on that you're correct.)
But big Tech could have EASILY not gone the AI route. But in the pursuit of profit over everything, they are looking to cut corners and automate as much as possible. At this point almost no content moderation on social media is done by humans. That's a problem. Buzzfeed is making AI articles that's a problem. AI is going to start developing games etc. The government didn't come from on high and tell devs to make Chat GPT or Open AI.

And the problem is, the growth of it is exponential. The more people use it, the more sophisticated it gets, the more it knows about us and our desires. You think the algorithm is bad now...just wait until it doesn't need to wait on humans to create the content.
 

Wink Beaufield

Superstar
Joined
Oct 9, 2015
Messages
4,662
Reputation
1,161
Daps
23,604
Reppin
Southeast DC
That's not a good thing. Last thing I want is rampant A.I. making massive decisions with global economic ramifications with NO human beings with the nuance to legislate it.

Just because we CAN doesn't me we always SHOULD.
This was actually brought up in some fed agencies that make decisions on things like benefits (VA, SSA, DoL) and they want to keep humans there for the obvious accountability reasons.

Same goes for the Patent Office.
 

IIVI

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
13,708
Reputation
3,529
Daps
48,916
Reppin
Los Angeles
The government doesn't mandate that AI be created. The driving force of innovation hasn't been the government for years. This is all on the Tech Industry (and the de-regulation of it, so on that you're correct.)
But big Tech could have EASILY not gone the AI route. But in the pursuit of profit over everything, they are looking to cut corners and automate as much as possible. At this point almost no content moderation on social media is done by humans. That's a problem. Buzzfeed is making AI articles that's a problem. AI is going to start developing games etc. The government didn't come from on high and tell devs to make Chat GPT or Open AI.

And the problem is, the growth of it is exponential. The more people use it, the more sophisticated it gets, the more it knows about us and our desires. You think the algorithm is bad now...just wait until it doesn't need to wait on humans to create the content.
Yeah, one thing I've learned that with non-stop enabling, people want to experiment with how far they can take it. That's almost in any field and we're seeing it in tech.

I think this is where lawmakers need to step in as well, but everyone we could have elected to do something about this and who has said they'll account for things like this are people nobody voted for.

Like i mentioned in my initial post: time after time we ignored the implications of A.I. People have been talking about A.I replacing humans for about a decade now and nobody listened. Now it's here and because we have no policies, we are officially behind. As you mentioned, tech increases are exponential so we really shot ourselves right in the foot.

It goes back to that concept of people not caring unless they're facing immediate danger. Many smokers don't care about cigarettes causing lung cancer if the next cigarette won't kill them.

Like someone else said, this is the new smartphone, but I think it'll be even more lucrative because we incrementally got to the smartphone.

A.I and what it can do basically dropped on us (although it was really incrementally engineered) and people are now going in every which way with it taking over and sweeping industries. As a software engineer myself I and many other people saw what folks were building at work and on their personal projects, but nobody really listened to our warnings.

I mean Boston Dynamics robots were nearly 10 years ago and people were saying "wait until self-automated A.I gets put into these things". Terminator, Skynet, etc. talk was seen as comedy more than anything. However, now it's a reality.

Now we got to see in which directions people are going to take it because there are no laws there to stop it nor stop the CEO's, tyc00ns and moguls from replacing people with it. This is equally on the engineers as it is on people supporting it or not doing anything about it.
 
Last edited:

Black Magisterialness

Moderna Boi
Supporter
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
19,601
Reputation
4,125
Daps
47,126
This is equally on the engineers as it is on people supporting it or not doing anything about it.

I disagree on this point.

People don't know what they don't know. And the average person doesn't know or care about ChatGPT. The tech savvy are in the know. The gamers and whatnot are in the know. But the average, everyday person? No they don't care. Not because they are willfully ignorant as you illustrate. But because our leaders and the industry itself has not even begun to talk about the pitfalls. People still give their data over WILLINGLY to China through Tik Tok. Expecting the populace to understand the dangers of unregulated AI is a exercise in futility. Like with EPA, FDA and other federal regulators, sometimes people actually DO need to be saved from themselves.

The tech industry ran RAMPANT for the better part of twenty years. And folks on the left have been screaming about Meta and Google being broken up for a while now. Apple too. But no one ran on those platforms, because its too sophisticated. The electorate is NOT that savvy. So this falls to the industry itself and those select few legislators, whistleblowers and watchdogs to call them out on this shyt. The people are not culpable for an industry that refuses to properly regulate itself.
 

Duke Wy Lin

It's been a good run. Wish y'all the best ✊🏿
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
3,826
Reputation
1,454
Daps
19,744
Microsoft just integrated chatGPT into Bing search. It might be game over brehs.

Google fumbling the AI bag rn

 

Duke Wy Lin

It's been a good run. Wish y'all the best ✊🏿
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
3,826
Reputation
1,454
Daps
19,744
Google Lost 100 billion in value in a few hours because they fumbled a presentation:damn:
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,856
Daps
204,019
Reppin
the ether
I thought google had the ai that was so “human like” that one of the workers got fired for leaking info on it :lupe:



Why are they scared?


One major issue is that it's a lose-lose situation for them. Right now they make gargantuan profits off of search. If they create a great AI, people stop using search...and their profit model is destroyed. Like someone else said, Microsoft has nothing to lose here while Google had everything to lose.
 
Top